Academic Centre of General Practice, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 7 -Box 7001, Leuven 3000 Belgium.
Health and Wellbeing, Plymouth Marjon University, Plymouth, UK.
Health Policy. 2023 Sep;135:104880. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2023.104880. Epub 2023 Jul 25.
To provide an overview of types and characteristics of self-management support (SMS) interventions in adults with chronic disease and to assess the impact on the patient reported outcome Quality of Life (QoL).
An umbrella review of systematic reviews was conducted. We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, CINAHL and the Cochrane Library from January 2016 to November 2020 for reviews on SMS interventions for chronic diseases, assessing the impact on the patient reported outcome QoL. Quality assessment was based on the JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist for Systematic reviews and Research Syntheses tool.
28 reviews were included. The extensive literature review revealed a variety of SMS interventions. The most frequently cited target group for the interventions were individuals with diabetes. Interventions primarily took place in the home setting. Interventional components that were often incorporated were education, eHealth and mHealth technologies, and coaching techniques. Telephone communication was regularly reported as a type of intervention follow-up. The impact on QoL was mixed and no firm conclusions can be drawn. However, our review revealed a beneficial effect of education.
Interventions including educational components seem promising for supporting self-management and showed a beneficial effect on QoL. More research is needed to explore where, by whom and how interventions are ideally delivered.
概述慢性病成人自我管理支持(SMS)干预措施的类型和特点,并评估其对患者报告的生活质量(QoL)结果的影响。
对 2016 年 1 月至 2020 年 11 月期间发表的关于 SMS 干预慢性疾病的系统评价进行了伞式综述,检索了 PubMed、Embase、Web of Science、CINAHL 和 Cochrane Library,评估了 SMS 干预措施对患者报告的生活质量结果的影响。质量评估基于 JBI 系统评价和研究综合工具的批判性评价清单。
共纳入 28 篇综述。广泛的文献回顾揭示了各种 SMS 干预措施。干预措施最常针对的目标人群是糖尿病患者。干预措施主要在家庭环境中进行。经常纳入的干预性组成部分包括教育、电子健康和移动健康技术以及辅导技术。电话沟通通常被报道为一种干预措施的随访方式。对 QoL 的影响是混合的,无法得出明确的结论。然而,我们的综述显示,教育干预措施具有有益的效果。
包括教育内容的干预措施似乎对支持自我管理有一定的帮助,并对 QoL 有有益的影响。需要进一步研究以探索干预措施理想的提供方式、对象和方法。