Suppr超能文献

自我管理支持干预措施的特点及其对慢性病成人生活质量的影响:系统评价的伞状综述。

Characteristics of self-management support (SMS) interventions and their impact on Quality of Life (QoL) in adults with chronic diseases: An umbrella review of systematic reviews.

机构信息

Academic Centre of General Practice, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 7 -Box 7001, Leuven 3000 Belgium.

Health and Wellbeing, Plymouth Marjon University, Plymouth, UK.

出版信息

Health Policy. 2023 Sep;135:104880. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2023.104880. Epub 2023 Jul 25.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To provide an overview of types and characteristics of self-management support (SMS) interventions in adults with chronic disease and to assess the impact on the patient reported outcome Quality of Life (QoL).

METHODS

An umbrella review of systematic reviews was conducted. We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, CINAHL and the Cochrane Library from January 2016 to November 2020 for reviews on SMS interventions for chronic diseases, assessing the impact on the patient reported outcome QoL. Quality assessment was based on the JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist for Systematic reviews and Research Syntheses tool.

RESULTS

28 reviews were included. The extensive literature review revealed a variety of SMS interventions. The most frequently cited target group for the interventions were individuals with diabetes. Interventions primarily took place in the home setting. Interventional components that were often incorporated were education, eHealth and mHealth technologies, and coaching techniques. Telephone communication was regularly reported as a type of intervention follow-up. The impact on QoL was mixed and no firm conclusions can be drawn. However, our review revealed a beneficial effect of education.

CONCLUSIONS AND PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS

Interventions including educational components seem promising for supporting self-management and showed a beneficial effect on QoL. More research is needed to explore where, by whom and how interventions are ideally delivered.

摘要

目的

概述慢性病成人自我管理支持(SMS)干预措施的类型和特点,并评估其对患者报告的生活质量(QoL)结果的影响。

方法

对 2016 年 1 月至 2020 年 11 月期间发表的关于 SMS 干预慢性疾病的系统评价进行了伞式综述,检索了 PubMed、Embase、Web of Science、CINAHL 和 Cochrane Library,评估了 SMS 干预措施对患者报告的生活质量结果的影响。质量评估基于 JBI 系统评价和研究综合工具的批判性评价清单。

结果

共纳入 28 篇综述。广泛的文献回顾揭示了各种 SMS 干预措施。干预措施最常针对的目标人群是糖尿病患者。干预措施主要在家庭环境中进行。经常纳入的干预性组成部分包括教育、电子健康和移动健康技术以及辅导技术。电话沟通通常被报道为一种干预措施的随访方式。对 QoL 的影响是混合的,无法得出明确的结论。然而,我们的综述显示,教育干预措施具有有益的效果。

结论和实际意义

包括教育内容的干预措施似乎对支持自我管理有一定的帮助,并对 QoL 有有益的影响。需要进一步研究以探索干预措施理想的提供方式、对象和方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验