Suppr超能文献

≥75 岁患者中应用 Synergy 支架经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的疗效:Synergy 老年患者注册研究的 1 年临床结果。

Efficacy of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Synergy Stents in Patients Aged ≥75 Years: 1-Year Clinical Outcomes from the Synergy Elderly Registry.

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Severance Cardiovascular Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea; Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yeungnam University College of Medicine, Daegu, South Korea.

Division of Cardiology, Severance Cardiovascular Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 2023 Oct 1;204:43-52. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2023.07.094. Epub 2023 Aug 1.

Abstract

Data regarding the clinical outcomes of older patients after Synergy everolimus-eluting stent (S-EES) implantation are limited. This study investigated the 12-month clinical outcomes of older patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention with new-generation drug-eluting stents according to ischemic risks. This prospective multicenter study targeted patients aged ≥75 years who underwent S-EES implantation. The primary and secondary end points included 12-month device-oriented composite end point (DOCE) (cardiovascular death, target vessel myocardial infarction, or target lesion revascularization) and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs; all-cause death, myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization, stent thrombosis, or stroke), respectively. A stratified analysis was conducted according to high-ischemic risk (HIR), defined as complex coronary intervention (number of stents implanted ≥3, total stented length >60 mm, chronic total occlusion, left main, or bifurcation), diabetes, or chronic kidney disease. In total, 650 enrolled patients aged ≥75 years were categorized into HIR (n = 425) and non-HIR groups (n = 225). In the total population, the 1-year incidence of DOCEs was 2.5%. The rates of DOCEs were not significantly different between the HIR and the non-HIR groups, whereas the MACCE rate was higher in the HIR (9.4%) than the non-HIR group (4.9%, p = 0.035), and the DOCE and MACCE components did not differ significantly in the occurrence between the groups. The independent predictors for the DOCEs or MACCEs included age, anemia, or left ventricular ejection fraction <40%. In conclusion, in older patients, S-EES implantation demonstrated favorable device-related outcomes, regardless of procedural complexity or co-morbidities. However, it requires careful attention because older patients with HIR are associated with worse clinical outcomes.

摘要

关于使用 Synergy 依维莫司洗脱支架(S-EES)后老年患者的临床结果数据有限。本研究根据缺血风险调查了使用新一代药物洗脱支架行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的老年患者的 12 个月临床结果。这项前瞻性多中心研究的目标人群为年龄≥75 岁且接受 S-EES 植入术的患者。主要和次要终点分别为 12 个月器械导向的复合终点(DOCE)(心血管死亡、靶血管心肌梗死或靶病变血运重建)和主要不良心脏和脑血管事件(MACCE;全因死亡、心肌梗死、靶血管血运重建、支架血栓形成或卒中等)。根据高缺血风险(HIR)进行分层分析,HIR 定义为复杂的冠状动脉介入(植入支架数≥3 个、总支架长度>60mm、慢性完全闭塞、左主干或分叉病变)、糖尿病或慢性肾脏病。共纳入 650 名年龄≥75 岁的患者,分为 HIR 组(n=425)和非 HIR 组(n=225)。在总人群中,DOCEs 的 1 年发生率为 2.5%。HIR 组和非 HIR 组的 DOCEs 发生率无显著差异,而 HIR 组的 MACCE 发生率较高(9.4%比非 HIR 组的 4.9%,p=0.035),且两组间 DOCE 和 MACCE 组成部分的发生率无显著差异。DOCEs 或 MACCEs 的独立预测因素包括年龄、贫血或左心室射血分数<40%。总之,在老年患者中,S-EES 植入术表现出良好的器械相关结果,无论手术复杂性或合并症如何。然而,由于 HIR 老年患者的临床结局较差,需要谨慎关注。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验