Wu Yeshun, Gao Zhenyan, Jin Qizhi, Zheng Jiasheng, Xu Hongqing, Tu Xiaoming
Department of Cardiology, the Quzhou Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Quzhou People's Hospital, Quzhou, China.
Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2024 Jan-Dec;30:10760296241309633. doi: 10.1177/10760296241309633.
After coronary drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation, dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT, usually aspirin in combination with a P2Y12 inhibitor) is necessary. However, older patients are prone to aspirin intolerance or resistance. Indobufen has been reported as an ideal alternative to aspirin. To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of indobufen-based DAPT in this population, a total of 251 older patients (aged ≥65 years) undergoing coronary DES implantation in a tertiary healthcare facility in Quzhou, China, were enrolled, of which 110 received indobufen-based DAPT and 141 received aspirin-based DAPT. Baseline data, adverse reactions, adverse events, angina attacks, and repeated revascularization during 1-year follow-up were collected. At 1-year follow-up, creatinine, and left ventricular ejection fraction levels in the indobufen group were higher than those in the aspirin group, whereas estimated glomerular filtration rate levels were lower than those in the aspirin group. No significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions or adverse events was found between the two groups. At 1-year follow-up, the incidence of angina in the indobufen group was significantly lower than that in the aspirin group, and the repeated revascularization rate was lower than that in the aspirin group. Indobufen-based DAPT was beneficial in avoiding repeated revascularizations (odds ratio 0.433, 95% CI 0.229-0.821, = 0.010). These findings highlight that, for older patients who underwent coronary DES implantation, indobufen-based DAPT may be a better choice, which can effectively improve patients' symptoms and prognosis. However, application to older patients with potential renal insufficiency requires caution.
冠状动脉药物洗脱支架(DES)植入术后,双联抗血小板治疗(DAPT,通常为阿司匹林联合P2Y12抑制剂)是必要的。然而,老年患者容易出现阿司匹林不耐受或抵抗。吲哚布芬已被报道为阿司匹林的理想替代品。为了评估以吲哚布芬为基础的DAPT在该人群中的临床疗效和安全性,在中国衢州一家三级医疗机构中,共纳入了251例接受冠状动脉DES植入术的老年患者(年龄≥65岁),其中110例接受以吲哚布芬为基础的DAPT,141例接受以阿司匹林为基础的DAPT。收集了基线数据、不良反应、不良事件、心绞痛发作以及1年随访期间的再次血管重建情况。在1年随访时,吲哚布芬组的肌酐和左心室射血分数水平高于阿司匹林组,而估算肾小球滤过率水平低于阿司匹林组。两组之间不良反应或不良事件的发生率没有显著差异。在1年随访时,吲哚布芬组的心绞痛发生率显著低于阿司匹林组,再次血管重建率也低于阿司匹林组。以吲哚布芬为基础的DAPT有助于避免再次血管重建(比值比0.433,95%可信区间0.229 - 0.821,P = 0.010)。这些发现表明,对于接受冠状动脉DES植入术的老年患者,以吲哚布芬为基础的DAPT可能是更好的选择,它可以有效改善患者症状和预后。然而,应用于有潜在肾功能不全的老年患者时需要谨慎。