Greene L E
J Biol Chem. 1986 Jan 25;261(3):1279-85.
Binding studies of myosin subfragment one (S-1) to regulated actin in the presence and absence of Ca2+ indicate that, as S-1 binds to regulated actin, tropomyosin-actin units undergo a cooperative transition from a weak to a strong S-1-binding form. Trybus and Taylor (Trybus, K.M., and Taylor, E.W. (1980) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 77, 7209-7213) suggested that this transition could be measured by the change in fluorescence of troponin I modified with 4-(N-iodoacetoxyethyl-N-methyl)-7-nitrobenz-2-oxa-1,3-diazole (IANBD). In the present study, this was tested by determining whether the change in fluorescence was proportional to the fraction of tropomyosin-actin units in the strong S-1-binding form as predicted by our model on the cooperative binding of S-1 to regulated actin (Hill, T.L., Eisenberg, E., and Greene, L.E. (1980) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 77, 3186-3190). Experiments were performed both in the presence and absence of Ca2+ by using troponin I modified with either IANBD or 5'-iodoacetamidofluorescein. In the presence of Ca2+, it was found, in agreement with the suggestion of Trybus and Taylor, that the change in fluorescence induced by S-1 was proportional to the fraction of tropomyosin-actin units shifting into the strong S-1 binding form, rather than to the fraction of actin sites having bound S-1. In the absence of Ca2+, the change in fluorescence induced by S-1 also did not reflect the binding of S-1 to regulated actin. However, in contrast to the results in the presence of Ca2+, the change in fluorescence induced by S-1 binding in the absence of Ca2+ was not in agreement with the fraction of tropomyosin-actin units calculated to be in the strong S-1 binding form by the model of Hill et al. Although a more complex model than that of Hill et al. may account for the observed fluorescence changes, it seems equally likely that at least in the absence of Ca2+, the change in fluorescence may be reflecting a more complex behavior than only the transition of tropomyosin-actin units between the weak and strong S-1-binding forms.
肌球蛋白亚片段一(S-1)在有Ca2+和无Ca2+情况下与调节性肌动蛋白的结合研究表明,当S-1与调节性肌动蛋白结合时,原肌球蛋白-肌动蛋白单元会经历从弱S-1结合形式到强S-1结合形式的协同转变。Trybus和Taylor(Trybus, K.M., and Taylor, E.W. (1980) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 77, 7209 - 7213)提出,这种转变可以通过用4-(N-碘乙酰氧基乙基-N-甲基)-7-硝基苯并-2-恶唑-1,3-二氮杂环戊二烯(IANBD)修饰的肌钙蛋白I的荧光变化来测量。在本研究中,通过确定荧光变化是否与原肌球蛋白-肌动蛋白单元处于强S-1结合形式的比例成正比来对此进行测试,这是根据我们关于S-1与调节性肌动蛋白协同结合的模型(Hill, T.L., Eisenberg, E., and Greene, L.E. (1980) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 77, 3186 - 3190)所预测的。在有Ca2+和无Ca2+的情况下都进行了实验,使用了用IANBD或5'-碘乙酰氨基荧光素修饰的肌钙蛋白I。在有Ca2+的情况下,发现与Trybus和Taylor的建议一致,S-1诱导的荧光变化与转变为强S-1结合形式的原肌球蛋白-肌动蛋白单元的比例成正比,而不是与已结合S-1的肌动蛋白位点的比例成正比。在无Ca2+的情况下,S-1诱导的荧光变化也没有反映S-1与调节性肌动蛋白的结合。然而,与有Ca2+时的结果相反,在无Ca2+时S-1结合诱导的荧光变化与根据Hill等人的模型计算出的处于强S-1结合形式的原肌球蛋白-肌动蛋白单元比例不一致。尽管一个比Hill等人的模型更复杂的模型可能解释观察到的荧光变化,但似乎同样有可能的是,至少在无Ca2+的情况下,荧光变化可能反映的是一种比原肌球蛋白-肌动蛋白单元在弱S-1结合形式和强S-1结合形式之间的转变更为复杂的行为。