• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

PRIMA 试验结果:在未经活检的人群中,比较 STHLM3 试验和前列腺特异性抗原在一般实践中的前列腺癌检测。

Results from the PRIMA Trial: Comparison of the STHLM3 Test and Prostate-specific Antigen in General Practice for Detection of Prostate Cancer in a Biopsy-naïve Population.

机构信息

Department of Molecular Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus N, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus N, Denmark.

Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus N, Denmark; Department of Radiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus N, Denmark.

出版信息

Eur Urol Oncol. 2023 Oct;6(5):484-492. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2023.07.006. Epub 2023 Aug 1.

DOI:10.1016/j.euo.2023.07.006
PMID:37537016
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Current management of prostate cancer (PC) lacks biomarker tests and diagnostic procedures that can accurately distinguish clinically significant and clinically insignificant PCs at an early stage of the disease.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the Stockholm 3 (STHLM3) test and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) as entry tests for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in a prospective study of PC diagnosis in general practice.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Participants were biopsy-naïve men aged 50-69 yr who had a PSA test in general practice. Participants with PSA 1-10 ng/ml also had an STHLM3 test and were referred for MRI if the STHLM3 test was positive (risk ≥11%) and/or PSA ≥3 ng/ml, and to targeted MRI-guided biopsy (MRGB) if their Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) score was ≥3.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

The primary outcome was the number of International Society of Urological Pathology grade group ≥2 (GG ≥2) cases detected with a positive STHLM3 test versus PSA ≥3 ng/ml. Post hoc analysis was performed using a higher STHLM3 test cutoff (risk ≥15%; positive STHLM3 test).

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

Between January 2018 and December 2021, we recruited 1905 men. The STHLM3 test was performed in 1134 participants. Of these, 437 underwent MRI and 117 underwent MRGB, which detected 38 (32.5%) GG ≥2 and 52 (44.4%) with GG 1 cases. In comparison to PSA ≥3 ng/ml, a positive STHLM3 test increased detection of GG ≥2 from 30 to 37 cases (23.3%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 5.6-52.2%) and detection of GG 1 from 37 to 50 cases (35.1%, 95%CI 11.6-66.7%). STHLM3 positivity did not differ from PSA ≥3 ng/ml regarding detection of GG ≥2 PC (30 vs 32; 6.6%, 95% CI -8.1% to 25.9%), GG 1 PC (37 vs 37; 0.0%, 95% CI -19.6% to 25.0%), or MRGB use (88 vs 83; -5.7%, 95% CI -17.9% to 7.4%), but reduced MRI scans from 320 to 236 (-26.2%, 95% CI -33.1% to -18.9%).

CONCLUSIONS

The STHLM3 test improved sensitivity but not specificity for detection of GG ≥2 PC in the clinical setting of nonsystematic PC testing in general practice. Further studies are needed to validate a possible benefit of using a higher cutoff for STHLM3 positivity as an entry test for MRI.

PATIENT SUMMARY

We used a test called STHLM3 for detection of prostate cancer in general practice and compared its performance to the conventional PSA (prostate-specific antigen) test. We found that STHLM3 test results of 11% or above were not better at selecting men for MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) scans than the PSA test with a cutoff of 3 ng/ml or above. Analysis suggested that a higher cutoff for a positive STHLM3 test may improve selection of men for MRI scans, but further validation is needed.

摘要

背景

目前,前列腺癌(PC)的治疗缺乏生物标志物检测和诊断程序,无法在疾病早期准确区分具有临床意义和无临床意义的 PC。

目的

在一项前列腺癌诊断的前瞻性研究中,比较斯德哥尔摩 3 项测试(STHLM3)和前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)作为磁共振成像(MRI)的初始检测。

设计、地点和参与者:参与者为年龄在 50-69 岁的初次活检的男性,在普通诊所进行 PSA 检测。PSA 为 1-10ng/ml 的患者还进行了 STHLM3 测试,如果 STHLM3 测试结果为阳性(风险≥11%)和/或 PSA≥3ng/ml,则将其转诊进行 MRI,如果其前列腺成像报告和数据系统(PI-RADS)评分≥3,则进行靶向 MRI 引导活检(MRGB)。

结局测量和统计学分析

主要结局是通过阳性 STHLM3 测试检测到国际泌尿病理学会分级组≥2(GG≥2)病例的数量,而不是 PSA≥3ng/ml。使用更高的 STHLM3 测试截止值(风险≥15%;阳性 STHLM3 测试)进行了事后分析。

结果和局限性

2018 年 1 月至 2021 年 12 月,我们招募了 1905 名男性。在 1134 名参与者中进行了 STHLM3 测试。其中,437 名患者进行了 MRI 检查,117 名患者进行了 MRGB 检查,检测到 38 例(32.5%)GG≥2 和 52 例(44.4%)GG 1 例。与 PSA≥3ng/ml 相比,阳性 STHLM3 测试将 GG≥2 的检出率从 30 例增加到 37 例(23.3%,95%CI 5.6-52.2%),将 GG 1 检出率从 37 例增加到 50 例(35.1%,95%CI 11.6-66.7%)。阳性 STHLM3 与 PSA≥3ng/ml 相比,在检测 GG≥2 PC(30 与 32;6.6%,95%CI-8.1%至 25.9%)、GG 1 PC(37 与 37;0.0%,95%CI-19.6%至 25.0%)或 MRGB 使用(88 与 83;-5.7%,95%CI-17.9%至 7.4%)方面无差异,但减少了 320 次 MRI 扫描至 236 次(-26.2%,95%CI-33.1%至-18.9%)。

结论

在普通诊所非系统性 PC 检测的临床环境中,STHLM3 测试提高了 GG≥2 PC 的检测敏感性,但特异性未提高。需要进一步的研究来验证使用较高的 STHLM3 阳性作为 MRI 检测的初始检测的可能益处。

患者总结

我们在普通诊所使用一种名为 STHLM3 的测试来检测前列腺癌,并将其与常规的 PSA(前列腺特异性抗原)测试进行了比较。我们发现,STHLM3 测试结果为 11%或以上,在选择男性进行 MRI(磁共振成像)扫描方面,并不优于 PSA 测试,PSA 测试的截止值为 3ng/ml 或以上。分析表明,阳性 STHLM3 测试的较高截止值可能会改善男性接受 MRI 扫描的选择,但需要进一步验证。

相似文献

1
Results from the PRIMA Trial: Comparison of the STHLM3 Test and Prostate-specific Antigen in General Practice for Detection of Prostate Cancer in a Biopsy-naïve Population.PRIMA 试验结果:在未经活检的人群中,比较 STHLM3 试验和前列腺特异性抗原在一般实践中的前列腺癌检测。
Eur Urol Oncol. 2023 Oct;6(5):484-492. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2023.07.006. Epub 2023 Aug 1.
2
Prostate cancer screening using a combination of risk-prediction, MRI, and targeted prostate biopsies (STHLM3-MRI): a prospective, population-based, randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial.使用风险预测、MRI 和靶向前列腺活检的组合进行前列腺癌筛查(STHLM3-MRI):一项前瞻性、基于人群、随机、开放标签、非劣效性试验。
Lancet Oncol. 2021 Sep;22(9):1240-1249. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00348-X. Epub 2021 Aug 13.
3
Biomarker vs MRI-Enhanced Strategies for Prostate Cancer Screening: The STHLM3-MRI Randomized Clinical Trial.生物标志物与 MRI 增强策略在前列腺癌筛查中的比较:STHLM3-MRI 随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Apr 1;7(4):e247131. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.7131.
4
Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Prostate Cancer Screening at the Age of 45 Years: Results from the First Screening Round of the PROBASE Trial.45 岁时前列腺癌筛查的多参数磁共振成像:PROBASE 试验首轮筛查结果。
Eur Urol. 2024 Feb;85(2):105-111. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.09.027. Epub 2023 Oct 18.
5
Head-to-head Comparison of Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Prostate Biopsy Versus Multiparametric Prostate Resonance Imaging with Subsequent Magnetic Resonance-guided Biopsy in Biopsy-naïve Men with Elevated Prostate-specific Antigen: A Large Prospective Multicenter Clinical Study.经直肠超声引导前列腺活检与多参数前列腺磁共振成像引导活检在前列腺特异性抗原升高的初次活检男性中的头对头比较:一项大型前瞻性多中心临床研究。
Eur Urol. 2019 Apr;75(4):570-578. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.11.023. Epub 2018 Nov 23.
6
Repeated Prostate Cancer Screening Using Prostate-Specific Antigen Testing and Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Secondary Analysis of the STHLM3-MRI Randomized Clinical Trial.基于前列腺特异性抗原检测和磁共振成像的前列腺癌重复筛查:STHLM3-MRI 随机临床试验的二次分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Feb 5;7(2):e2354577. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.54577.
7
Prebiopsy Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis in Biopsy-naive Men with Suspected Prostate Cancer Based on Elevated Prostate-specific Antigen Values: Results from a Randomized Prospective Blinded Controlled Trial.基于前列腺特异性抗原值升高的前列腺癌初诊患者的前列腺癌诊断的活检前多参数磁共振成像:一项随机前瞻性盲法对照试验的结果。
Eur Urol. 2016 Mar;69(3):419-25. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.05.024. Epub 2015 May 29.
8
Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Targeted Versus Systematic Prostate Biopsies: 2-year Follow-up of a Prospective Randomized Trial (PRECISE).磁共振成像靶向与系统前列腺活检:一项前瞻性随机试验(PRECISE)的 2 年随访结果。
Eur Urol Oncol. 2024 Jun;7(3):456-461. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2023.09.013. Epub 2023 Oct 12.
9
Three-Tesla magnetic resonance-guided prostate biopsy in men with increased prostate-specific antigen and repeated, negative, random, systematic, transrectal ultrasound biopsies: detection of clinically significant prostate cancers.3.0T 磁共振引导下前列腺穿刺活检在前列腺特异抗原升高且经多次重复、阴性、随机、系统、经直肠超声引导前列腺穿刺活检后的男性中的应用:对临床显著前列腺癌的检出。
Eur Urol. 2012 Nov;62(5):902-9. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.01.047. Epub 2012 Feb 1.
10
Prostate cancer screening in men aged 50-69 years (STHLM3): a prospective population-based diagnostic study.50-69 岁男性前列腺癌筛查(STHLM3):一项前瞻性基于人群的诊断研究。
Lancet Oncol. 2015 Dec;16(16):1667-76. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00361-7. Epub 2015 Nov 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Personalised Prostate Cancer Diagnosis: Evaluating Biomarker-based Approaches to Reduce Unnecessary Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Biopsy Procedures.个性化前列腺癌诊断:评估基于生物标志物的方法以减少不必要的磁共振成像和活检程序。
Eur Urol Open Sci. 2025 Apr 15;75:106-119. doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2025.03.006. eCollection 2025 May.
2
Advancements in Biomarkers of Prostate Cancer: A Review.前列腺癌生物标志物的研究进展:综述。
Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2024 Jan-Dec;23:15330338241290029. doi: 10.1177/15330338241290029.