Suppr超能文献

规模化养猪系统中猪流行性腹泻病例的调查与分析及不同免疫策略的评估

Investigation and analysis of porcine epidemic diarrhea cases and evaluation of different immunization strategies in the large-scale swine farming system.

作者信息

Zhang Bingzhou, Qing Jie, Yan Zhong, Shi Yuntong, Wang Zewei, Chen Jing, Li Junxian, Li Shuangxi, Wu Weisheng, Hu Xiaofang, Li Yang, Zhang Xiaoyang, Wu Lili, Zhu Shouyue, Yan Zheng, Wang Yongquan, Guo Xiaoli, Yu Ligen, Li Xiaowen

机构信息

Shandong New Hope Liuhe Agriculture and Animal Husbandry Technology Co., Ltd. (NHLH Academy of Swine Research), Dezhou, 253034, China.

Xiajin New Hope Liuhe Agriculture and Animal Husbandry Co., Ltd, Dezhou, 253200, China.

出版信息

Porcine Health Manag. 2023 Aug 3;9(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s40813-023-00331-z.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Porcine epidemic diarrhea (PED) is a contagious intestinal disease caused by porcine epidemic diarrhea virus (PEDV) characterized by vomiting, diarrhea, anorexia, and dehydration, which has caused huge economic losses around the world. However, it is very hard to find completely valid approaches to control the transmission of PEDV. At present, vaccine immunity remains the most effective method. To better control the spread of PED and evaluate the validity of different immunization strategies, 240 PED outbreak cases from 577 swine breeding farms were collected and analyzed. The objective of the present study was to analyze the epidemic regularity of PEDV and evaluate two kinds of different immunization strategies for controlling PED.

RESULTS

The results showed that the main reasons which led to the outbreak of PED were the movement of pig herds between different pig farms (41.7%) and delaying piglets from the normal production flow (15.8%). The prevalence of PEDV in the hot season (May to October) was obviously higher than that in the cold season (January to April, November to December). Results of different vaccine immunity cases showed that immunization with the highly virulent live vaccine (NH-TA2020 strain) and the commercial inactivated vaccine could significantly decrease the frequency of swine breeding farms (5.9%), the duration of PED epidemic (1.70 weeks), and the week batches of dead piglets (0.48 weeks weaned piglets), compared with immunization with commercial attenuated vaccines and inactivated vaccine of PED. Meanwhile, immunization with the highly virulent live vaccine and the commercial inactivated vaccine could bring us more cash flows of Y̶275,274 per year than immunization with commercial live attenuated vaccine and inactivated vaccine in one 3000 sow pig farm within one year.

CONCLUSION

Therefore, immunization with highly virulent live vaccine and inactivated vaccine of PED is more effective and economical in the prevention and control of PED in the large-scale swine farming system.

摘要

背景

猪流行性腹泻(PED)是由猪流行性腹泻病毒(PEDV)引起的一种传染性肠道疾病,其特征为呕吐、腹泻、厌食和脱水,已在全球范围内造成巨大经济损失。然而,很难找到完全有效的方法来控制PEDV的传播。目前,疫苗免疫仍然是最有效的方法。为了更好地控制PED的传播并评估不同免疫策略的有效性,收集并分析了来自577个养猪场的240起PED疫情病例。本研究的目的是分析PEDV的流行规律,并评估两种不同的免疫策略对控制PED的效果。

结果

结果表明,导致PED爆发的主要原因是不同猪场之间猪群的流动(41.7%)以及仔猪偏离正常生产流程(15.8%)。PEDV在炎热季节(5月至10月)的流行率明显高于寒冷季节(1月至4月、11月至12月)。不同疫苗免疫病例的结果显示,与使用PED商业弱毒疫苗和灭活疫苗免疫相比,使用高致病性活疫苗(NH-TA2020株)和商业灭活疫苗免疫可显著降低养猪场的发病频率(5.9%)、PED疫情持续时间(1.70周)以及仔猪死亡的周批次(0.48周断奶仔猪)。同时,在一个存栏3000头母猪的猪场中,使用高致病性活疫苗和商业灭活疫苗免疫每年比使用商业弱毒活疫苗和灭活疫苗免疫可带来多275,274元的现金流。

结论

因此,在大规模养猪系统中,使用PED高致病性活疫苗和灭活疫苗进行免疫在PED的预防和控制方面更有效且更经济。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c52/10401829/ed1a2319a978/40813_2023_331_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验