Clinical Oncologist, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Bogotá, Colombia. Clinical Professor, Department of Internal Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá, Colombia.
Thoracic Surgeon, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Bogotá, Colombia. Centro de Tratamiento e Investigación sobre Cáncer Luis Carlos Sarmiento Angulo (CTIC), Bogotá, Colombia.
Cancer Control. 2023 Jan-Dec;30:10732748231189785. doi: 10.1177/10732748231189785.
To describe the survival outcomes of metastatic non-small cell lung cancer patients with limited access to immunotherapy and targeted therapy in a cancer reference center in Colombia.
A retrospective analysis of metastatic non-small cell lung cancer patients treated between 2013 and 2018 was performed, majority diagnosed with adenocarcinoma. It was carried out in a public cancer reference center that provides care to patients of low and middle socioeconomic status. Overall survival and progression-free survival were evaluated by Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank test. A Cox regression model was performed for univariate and multivariate analysis.
209 patients were included with majority of adenocarcinoma (79.5%). First-line treatment was cytotoxic chemotherapy (50.2%), EGFR-targeted therapy (14.8%), chemoimmunotherapy (1.9%), and ALK-targeted therapy (1.4%). 31.6% received best supportive care. Median time of follow-up was 13 months, median overall survival was 11.2 months (95% CI, 7.9-14.4), 13 months for adenocarcinoma (95% CI, 8.1-17.9), and 2.5 months for squamous cell carcinoma (95% CI, 0.6-4.4) ( < .001). Median progression-free survival was 9.3 months (95% CI, 7.9-10.7) without differences according to the type of first-line therapy. Median time-to-treatment was 55 days and only 54% of patients with a tested actionable mutation in EGFR received an EGFR-targeted therapy as the first-line treatment. Multivariate analysis showed that squamous cell carcinoma histology and receiving best supportive care were independent factors for worse overall survival ((HR:1.8, 95% CI, 1.076-3.082, P=.026) and (HR:14.6, 95% CI, 8.921-24.049, < .001), respectively). Meanwhile, squamous cell carcinoma histology was an independent factor for worse progression-free survival (HR:3.4, 95% CI, 1.540-7.464, P=.002).
Despite advances in precision medicine, during the study period, cytotoxic chemotherapy was the most used treatment in our patients. Furthermore, about a third of them received best supportive care. The use of targeted therapies has been restricted by access to molecular diagnosis and remained low until 2018. Access to immunotherapy should be prioritized.
描述在哥伦比亚一家癌症参考中心,免疫治疗和靶向治疗机会有限的转移性非小细胞肺癌患者的生存结果。
对 2013 年至 2018 年间接受治疗的转移性非小细胞肺癌患者进行回顾性分析,大多数患者被诊断为腺癌。该研究在一家为中低收入社会经济地位的患者提供服务的公共癌症参考中心进行。通过 Kaplan-Meier 分析和对数秩检验评估总生存期和无进展生存期。进行单因素和多因素 Cox 回归模型分析。
共纳入 209 例患者,其中大多数为腺癌(79.5%)。一线治疗为细胞毒性化疗(50.2%)、EGFR 靶向治疗(14.8%)、化疗免疫治疗(1.9%)和 ALK 靶向治疗(1.4%)。31.6%的患者接受最佳支持治疗。中位随访时间为 13 个月,中位总生存期为 11.2 个月(95%CI,7.9-14.4),腺癌为 13 个月(95%CI,8.1-17.9),鳞状细胞癌为 2.5 个月(95%CI,0.6-4.4)(<0.001)。无进展生存期的中位时间为 9.3 个月(95%CI,7.9-10.7),与一线治疗类型无差异。中位治疗时间为 55 天,仅有 54%的 EGFR 可检测到靶向治疗的突变患者接受 EGFR 靶向治疗作为一线治疗。多因素分析显示,鳞状细胞癌组织学和接受最佳支持治疗是总生存期更差的独立因素(HR:1.8,95%CI,1.076-3.082,P=0.026)和(HR:14.6,95%CI,8.921-24.049,<0.001)。同时,鳞状细胞癌组织学是无进展生存期更差的独立因素(HR:3.4,95%CI,1.540-7.464,P=0.002)。
尽管精准医学取得了进展,但在研究期间,细胞毒性化疗仍是我们患者中最常用的治疗方法。此外,大约三分之一的患者接受了最佳支持治疗。靶向治疗的应用受到分子诊断的限制,直到 2018 年仍保持较低水平。应优先考虑免疫治疗的应用。