Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2023 Oct;24(10):e14070. doi: 10.1002/acm2.14070. Epub 2023 Aug 4.
To evaluate the dosimetric impact of titanium implants in spine SBRT using four dose calculation algorithms. Twenty patients with titanium implants in the spine treated with SBRT without density override (DO) were selected. The clinical plan for each patient was created in Pinnacle and subsequently imported into Eclipse (AAA and AcurosXB) and Raystation (CC) for dose evaluation with and without DO to the titanium implant. We renormalized all plans such that 90% of the tumor volume received the prescription dose and subsequently evaluated the following dose metrics: (1) the maximum dose to 0.03 cc (Dmax), dose to 99% (D99%) and 90% (D90%) of the tumor volume; (2) Dmax and volumetric metrics of the spinal cord. For the same algorithm, plans with and without DO had similar dose distributions. Differences in Dmax, D99% and D90% of the tumor were on average <2% with slightly larger variations up to 5.58% in Dmax using AcurosXB. Dmax of the spinal cord for plans calculated with DO increased but the differences were clinically insignificant for all algorithms (mean: 0.36% ± 0.7%). Comparing to the clinical plans, the relative differences for all algorithms had an average of 1.73% (-10.36%-13.21%) for the tumor metrics and -0.93% (-9.87%-10.95%) for Dmax of the spinal cord. A few cases with small tumor and spinal cord volumes, dose differences of >10% in both D99% and Dmax of the tumor, and Dmax of the spinal cord were observed. For all algorithms, the presence of titanium implants in the spine for most patients had minimal impact on dose distributions with and without DO. For the same plan calculated with different algorithms, larger differences in volumetric metrics of >10% could be observed, impacted by dose gradient at the plan normalization volume, tumor volumes, plan complexity, and partial voxel volume interpolation.
评估脊柱 SBRT 中钛植入物的剂量学影响,使用四种剂量计算算法。选择了 20 名脊柱内有钛植入物且未进行密度覆盖(DO)的 SBRT 治疗患者。为每位患者在 Pinnacle 中创建临床计划,然后将其导入 Eclipse(AAA 和 AcurosXB)和 Raystation(CC)中,以评估有和无钛植入物 DO 时的剂量。我们对所有计划进行重新归一化,使 90%的肿瘤体积接受处方剂量,然后评估以下剂量指标:(1)0.03cc 的最大剂量(Dmax)、肿瘤 99%(D99%)和 90%(D90%)的剂量;(2)脊髓的 Dmax 和体积学指标。对于相同的算法,有和无 DO 的计划具有相似的剂量分布。肿瘤的 Dmax、D99%和 D90%的差异平均<2%,在使用 AcurosXB 时最大可达 5.58%。使用 DO 计算的计划中脊髓的 Dmax 增加,但对于所有算法,差异在临床意义上不显著(平均值:0.36%±0.7%)。与临床计划相比,对于所有算法,肿瘤指标的相对差异平均为 1.73%(-10.36%至-13.21%),脊髓的 Dmax 为-0.93%(-9.87%至-10.95%)。对于少数肿瘤和脊髓体积较小的病例,肿瘤的 D99%和 Dmax 以及脊髓的 Dmax 剂量差异超过 10%。对于所有算法,脊柱内钛植入物的存在对有和无 DO 的剂量分布影响最小。对于用不同算法计算的相同计划,体积学指标的差异可能超过 10%,这受到计划归一化体积、肿瘤体积、计划复杂性和部分体素体积插值的剂量梯度的影响。