Oliveira Simone Garcia, Ribeiro Jean Alex Matos, Silva Érika Shirley Moreira, Uliam Nicoly Ribeiro, Silveira Ana Flávia, Araújo Paloma Nepomuceno, Camargo Ana Isabela, Urruchia Vitoria Regina Rocha, Nogueira Samuel Lourenço, Russo Thiago Luiz
Department of Physical Therapy, Federal University of São Carlos, São Carlos, Brazil.
Department of Electrical Engineering, Federal University of São Carlos, São Carlos, Brazil.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2024 Feb;105(2):381-410. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2023.07.011. Epub 2023 Aug 3.
This systematic review aimed to determine which interventions increase physical activity (PA) and decrease sedentary behavior (SB) based on objective measures of movement behavior in individuals with stroke.
The PubMed (Medline), EMBASE, Scopus, CINAHL (EBSCO), and Web of Science databases were searched for articles published up to January 3, 2023.
The StArt 3.0.3 BETA software was used to screen titles, abstracts, and full texts for studies with randomized controlled trial designs; individuals with stroke (≥18 years of age); interventions aimed at increasing PA or decreasing SB; and objective measurement instruments.
Data extraction was standardized, considering participants and assessments of interest. The risk of bias and quality of evidence of the included studies were assessed.
Twenty-eight studies involving 1855 patients were included. Meta-analyses revealed that in the post-stroke acute/subacute phase, exercise interventions combined with behavior change techniques (BCTs) increased both daily steps (standardized mean difference [SMD]=0.65, P=.0002) and time spent on moderate-to-vigorous intensity physical activities (MVPAs) duration of PA (SMD=0.68, P=.0004) with moderate-quality evidence. In addition, interventions based only on BCTs increased PA levels with very low-quality evidence (SMD (low-intensity physical activity)=0.36, P=.02; SMD (MVPA)=0.56, P=.0004) and decreased SB with low-quality evidence (SMD=0.48, P=.03). In the post-stroke chronic phase, there is statistical significance in favor of exercise-only interventions in PA frequency (steps/day) with moderate-quality evidence (SMD=0.68, P=.002). In general, the risk of bias in the included studies was low.
In the acute/subacute phase after stroke, the use of BCTs combined with exercise can increase the number of daily steps and time spent on MVPA. In contrast, in the post-stroke chronic phase, exercise-only interventions resulted in a significant increase in daily steps.
本系统评价旨在根据中风患者运动行为的客观测量指标,确定哪些干预措施可增加身体活动(PA)并减少久坐行为(SB)。
检索了PubMed(Medline)、EMBASE、Scopus、CINAHL(EBSCO)和Web of Science数据库,以查找截至2023年1月3日发表的文章。
使用StArt 3.0.3 BETA软件筛选标题、摘要和全文,以查找具有随机对照试验设计的研究;中风患者(≥18岁);旨在增加PA或减少SB的干预措施;以及客观测量工具。
考虑到感兴趣的参与者和评估,数据提取进行了标准化。评估了纳入研究的偏倚风险和证据质量。
纳入了28项涉及1855名患者的研究。荟萃分析显示,在中风后的急性/亚急性期,运动干预与行为改变技术(BCTs)相结合可增加每日步数(标准化平均差[SMD]=0.65,P=0.0002)和中度至剧烈强度身体活动(MVPA)的时长(PA时长,SMD=0.68,P=0.0004),证据质量为中等。此外,仅基于BCTs的干预措施增加PA水平的证据质量极低(SMD(低强度身体活动)=0.36,P=0.02;SMD(MVPA)=0.56,P=0.0004),减少SB的证据质量低(SMD=0.48,P=0.03)。在中风后的慢性期,仅运动干预在PA频率(每日步数)方面具有统计学意义,证据质量中等(SMD=0.68,P=0.002)。总体而言,纳入研究的偏倚风险较低。
在中风后的急性/亚急性期,使用BCTs与运动相结合可增加每日步数和MVPA的时长。相比之下,在中风后的慢性期,仅运动干预可使每日步数显著增加。