Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2023 Aug 4;18(10):1092-1100. doi: 10.1123/ijspp.2023-0127. Print 2023 Oct 1.
The "2-point method," originally referred to as the "2-load method," was proposed in 2016 by Prof Slobodan Jaric to characterize the maximal mechanical capacities of the muscles to produce force, velocity, and power. Two years later, in 2018, Prof Jaric and I summarized in a review article the scientific evidence showing that the 2-point method, compared with the multiple-point method, is capable of providing the outcomes of the force-velocity (F-V) and load-velocity (L-V) relationships with similar reliability and high concurrent validity. However, a major gap of our review was that, until 2018, the feasibility of the 2-point method had only been explored through testing procedures based on multiple (more than 2) loads. This is problematic because (1) it has misled users into thinking that implementing the 2-point method inevitably requires testing more than 2 conditions and (2) obtaining the data from the same test could have artificially inflated the concurrent validity of the 2-point method. To overcome these limitations, subsequent studies have implemented in separate sessions the 2-point method under field conditions (only 2 different loads applied in the testing protocol) and the standard multiple-point method. These studies consistently demonstrate that while the outcomes of the 2-point method exhibit comparable reliability, they tend to have slightly higher magnitudes compared with the standard multiple-point method. This review article emphasizes the practical aspects that should be considered when applying the 2-point method under field conditions to obtain the main outcomes of the F-V and L-V relationships.
“两点法”最初被称为“两点负荷法”,是由 Slobodan Jaric 教授于 2016 年提出的,用于描述肌肉产生力量、速度和功率的最大机械能力。两年后的 2018 年,Jaric 教授和我在一篇综述文章中总结了科学证据,表明与多点法相比,两点法能够以类似的可靠性和高度的同时效度提供力-速度(F-V)和负荷-速度(L-V)关系的结果。然而,我们的综述有一个主要的不足之处,即直到 2018 年,两点法的可行性仅通过基于多个(超过 2 个)负荷的测试程序进行了探索。这是有问题的,因为:(1)它误导用户认为实施两点法必然需要测试超过 2 种条件;(2)从同一项测试中获得的数据可能人为地夸大了两点法的同时效度。为了克服这些限制,随后的研究在现场条件下(测试方案中仅施加 2 种不同的负荷)分别实施了两点法和标准多点法。这些研究一致表明,虽然两点法的结果具有可比性的可靠性,但与标准多点法相比,它们的数值往往略高。这篇综述文章强调了在现场条件下应用两点法获得 F-V 和 L-V 关系主要结果时应考虑的实际方面。