Rial-Vázquez Jessica, Camacho-Villa Alejandra, Rivera-Mejía Sonia Liliana, Nine Iván, Rúa-Alonso María, Fariñas Juan, Revuelta-Lera Borja, Iglesias-Soler Eliseo
Performance and Health Group, Department of Physical Education and Sport, Faculty of Sports Sciences and Physical Education, University of A Coruna, A Coruña, Spain.
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 30;20(6):e0327381. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0327381. eCollection 2025.
The main aims of this study were to compare the goodness of fit and derived parameters of linear and non-linear models for fitting the torque-velocity (TV) relationship in postmenopausal women, and to examine the influence of data processing on the results obtained.
Sixteen physically active postmenopausal women completed the experiment. Knee extensor (KE) and elbow flexor (EF) muscle strength was evaluated in the dominant limb using an isokinetic dynamometer. Isometric and isokinetic tests were conducted at 30, 60, 120, 180, 240, and 300°/s. Peak torque and the corresponding joint angles were recorded for each test. TV data were fitted using linear, quadratic polynomial (PM), and Hill's (HM) regression models. TV relationships were analyzed using both actual data (i.e., the velocity achieved and its associated torque; TVA) and target data (i.e., the velocity preset on the dynamometer and the torque reported; TVT). TV parameters derived from each model and their goodness of fit were calculated for both TVA and TVT relationships.
The goodness of fit and the estimated TV parameters derived from the regression models differed significantly between TVA and TVT for both KE and EF (P < 0.05). For TVA, the models with the best fit were HM for KE and PM for EF. However, HM yielded unrealistically high theoretical maximum velocity values (6764.69 ± 11619.09°/s) for KE. Parameter estimates for TVA differed significantly between models (P < 0.001).
Caution is advised when performing isokinetic assessments at high velocities in middle-aged women. The obtained data should be carefully examined, as TVA and TVT should not be used interchangeably. The choice of model can influence the estimated parameters. We recommend using quadratic polynomial models to fit TV data for both KE and EF in postmenopausal women.
本研究的主要目的是比较线性和非线性模型对绝经后女性扭矩 - 速度(TV)关系的拟合优度和导出参数,并研究数据处理对所得结果的影响。
16名身体活跃的绝经后女性完成了该实验。使用等速测力计评估优势肢体的膝伸肌(KE)和肘屈肌(EF)肌力。在30、60、120、180、240和300°/秒的速度下进行等长和等速测试。记录每次测试的峰值扭矩和相应的关节角度。使用线性、二次多项式(PM)和希尔(HM)回归模型拟合TV数据。使用实际数据(即达到的速度及其相关扭矩;TVA)和目标数据(即测力计上预设的速度和报告的扭矩;TVT)分析TV关系。计算TVA和TVT关系中每个模型导出的TV参数及其拟合优度。
KE和EF的TVA和TVT之间,回归模型的拟合优度和估计的TV参数存在显著差异(P < 0.05)。对于TVA,KE的最佳拟合模型是HM,EF的最佳拟合模型是PM。然而,HM得出KE的理论最大速度值过高(6764.69 ± 11619.09°/秒)。TVA的参数估计在模型之间存在显著差异(P < 0.001)。
建议在对中年女性进行高速等速评估时谨慎。应仔细检查获得的数据,因为TVA和TVT不应互换使用。模型的选择会影响估计参数。我们建议使用二次多项式模型拟合绝经后女性KE和EF的TV数据。