Suppr超能文献

方法很重要。一项将生物记录与相机陷阱作为描述野生动物栖息地选择数据源的比较研究。

The method matters. A comparative study of biologging and camera traps as data sources with which to describe wildlife habitat selection.

作者信息

Ferrer-Ferrando David, Fernández-López Javier, Triguero-Ocaña Roxana, Palencia Pablo, Vicente Joaquín, Acevedo Pelayo

机构信息

Instituto de Investigación en Recursos Cinegéticos (IREC), CSIC-UCLM-JCCM, Ciudad Real, Spain.

Université Montpellier, CNRS, EPHE, IRD, Montpellier, France; Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Sci Total Environ. 2023 Dec 1;902:166053. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.166053. Epub 2023 Aug 4.

Abstract

Habitat use is a virtually universal activity among animals and is highly relevant as regards designing wildlife management and conservation actions. This has led to the development of a great variety of methods to study it, of which resource selection functions combined with biologging-derived data (RSF) is the most widely used for this purpose. However this approach has some constraints, such as its invasiveness and high costs. Analytical approaches taking into consideration imperfect detection coupled with camera trap data (IDM) have, therefore, emerged as a non-invasive cost-effective alternative. However, despite the fact that both approaches (RSF and IDM) have been used in habitat selection studies, they should also be comparatively assessed. The objective of this work is consequently to assess them from two perspectives: explanatory and predictive. This has been done by analyzing data obtained from camera traps (60 sampling sites) and biologging (17 animals monitored: 7 red deer Cervus elaphus, 6 fallow deer Dama dama and 4 wild boar Sus scrofa) in the same periods using IDM and RSF, respectively, in Doñana National Park (southern Spain) in order to explain and predict habitat use patterns for three studied species. Our results showed discrepancies between the two approaches, as they identified different predictors as being the most relevant to determine species intensity of use, and they predicted spatial patterns of habitat use with a contrasted level of concordance, depending on species and scale. Given these results and the characteristics of each approach, we suggested that although partly comparable interpretations can be obtained with both approaches, they are not equivalent but rather complementary. The combination of data from biologging and camera traps would, therefore, appear to be suitable for the development of an analytical framework with which to describe and characterise the habitat use processes of wildlife.

摘要

栖息地利用是动物中几乎普遍存在的活动,对于设计野生动物管理和保护行动具有高度相关性。这导致了研究它的多种方法的发展,其中结合生物记录数据的资源选择函数(RSF)是为此目的最广泛使用的方法。然而,这种方法有一些限制,例如其侵入性和高成本。因此,考虑到不完美检测与相机陷阱数据相结合的分析方法(IDM)已成为一种非侵入性的经济有效替代方法。然而,尽管这两种方法(RSF和IDM)都已用于栖息地选择研究,但它们也应该进行比较评估。因此,这项工作的目的是从两个角度评估它们:解释性和预测性。这是通过分别使用IDM和RSF分析在同一时期从西班牙南部多尼亚纳国家公园的相机陷阱(60个采样点)和生物记录(监测17只动物:7只马鹿、6只黇鹿和4只野猪)获得的数据来完成的,以便解释和预测三种研究物种的栖息地利用模式。我们的结果表明这两种方法之间存在差异,因为它们确定了不同的预测因子与确定物种利用强度最相关,并且它们根据物种和尺度以不同程度的一致性预测栖息地利用的空间模式。鉴于这些结果和每种方法的特点,我们建议尽管两种方法都可以获得部分可比的解释,但它们并不等同而是互补的。因此,生物记录和相机陷阱的数据组合似乎适合开发一个分析框架,用以描述和表征野生动物的栖息地利用过程。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验