Suppr超能文献

BRAF 突变型转移性黑色素瘤的三联疗法和治疗顺序的作用。在 BRAFV600 突变阳性的晚期黑色素瘤(IMspire150)患者中,一线阿特珠单抗联合维莫非尼和考比替尼的总生存期:多中心、随机、3 期研究的第二次期中分析。

The role of triple therapy and therapy sequence in treatment of BRAF-mutant metastatic melanoma. Response to overall survival with first-line atezolizumab in combination with vemurafenib and cobimetinib in BRAFV600 mutation-positive advanced melanoma (IMspire150): second interim analysis of a multicentre, randomised, phase 3 study.

机构信息

Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Faculty of Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

出版信息

J Transl Med. 2023 Aug 5;21(1):529. doi: 10.1186/s12967-023-04391-1.

Abstract

Novel therapies have achieved unprecedented benefit in survival of advanced melanoma patients. While immunotherapy (ICI) can be administered independent of mutational status, BRAF and MEK kinase inhibitors represent another effective treatment option for patients with BRAF mutant melanoma. Given the benefits these therapies demonstrate, the natural instinct was to combine. Three studies have investigated the benefit of combination of ICI using anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1 antibody and targeted therapy (TT) with BRAF and MEK inhibitors over TT and placebo. Among these studies, statistically significantly superior duration of response was observed, however overall and progression-free survival were only numerically superior, if at all. One triple combination was approved for BRAF mutant metastatic melanoma; however, the expected synergistic effect of triple therapy could not be universally confirmed and the observed benefits with triple seem to depend on statistical considerations rather than a biological reason. As patients with BRAF mutant melanoma have both ICI and TT as their first-line treatment options, the question whether the sequence matters was addressed. Two prospective trials compared first-line ICI, followed by TT at progression, or vice-versa, with additional "sandwich" approach (8 weeks of TT followed by ICI until progression, then TT again) in the Secombit study. The benefit of first-line ICI was demonstrated in both studies with Secombit study showing the "sandwich" approach to have similar effect. Current data advices for immunotherapy based regiments in patients with BRAF mutant melanoma or, possibly, sandwich approach. Whether triple therapy is superior to ICI monotherapy still needs to be addressed considering not only efficacy, but also safety.

摘要

新型疗法在晚期黑色素瘤患者的生存中取得了前所未有的获益。虽然免疫疗法(ICI)可以独立于突变状态进行给药,但 BRAF 和 MEK 激酶抑制剂代表了另一种针对 BRAF 突变型黑色素瘤患者的有效治疗选择。鉴于这些疗法所带来的益处,人们自然而然地想到了联合治疗。三项研究探讨了 ICI 联合使用抗 PD-1 或抗 PD-L1 抗体与 BRAF 和 MEK 抑制剂靶向治疗(TT)与 TT 和安慰剂相比的获益。在这些研究中,观察到应答持续时间具有统计学显著优势,但总生存和无进展生存仅在数值上具有优势,如果有的话。一种三联疗法已被批准用于治疗 BRAF 突变型转移性黑色素瘤;然而,三联疗法的预期协同作用不能被普遍证实,并且观察到的三联疗法的获益似乎取决于统计学考虑而不是生物学原因。由于 BRAF 突变型黑色素瘤患者均有 ICI 和 TT 作为一线治疗选择,因此是否存在治疗顺序的问题。两项前瞻性试验比较了一线 ICI 后进展时使用 TT,或反之,在 Secombit 研究中还采用了额外的“夹心”方法(8 周 TT 后用 ICI 直到进展,然后再次 TT)。两项研究均证实了一线 ICI 的获益,且 Secombit 研究表明“夹心”方法具有相似的效果。目前的数据建议 BRAF 突变型黑色素瘤患者使用基于免疫疗法的治疗方案,或者可能采用夹心方法。考虑到不仅是疗效,还有安全性,还需要确定三联疗法是否优于 ICI 单药治疗。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验