Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences and Center for Weight, Eating, and Lifestyle Science (WELL Center), Drexel University, 3201 Chestnut St., Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Department of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, Mailstop 8134-29-2100, 660 S. Euclid Ave., St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.
Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences and Center for Weight, Eating, and Lifestyle Science (WELL Center), Drexel University, 3201 Chestnut St., Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Eat Behav. 2023 Aug;50:101791. doi: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2023.101791. Epub 2023 Aug 2.
This study aimed to: 1) compare rates of dietary restraint and restriction between adolescents with and without loss-of-control (LOC) eating who were seeking weight control and 2) examine temporal relations between restraint/restriction and LOC eating.
37 adolescents seeking weight control (mean age: 15.4 ± 1.5; 62 % White; 57 % female; mean BMI percentile = 97.3 ± 3.1) completed a one-week ecological momentary assessment protocol and reported on dietary restraint/restriction and eating behavior prior to beginning a weight control intervention. Chi-square tests examined differences in frequency of restraint/restriction between participants with and without LOC eating. Multilevel models examined associations between dietary restraint/restriction and LOC eating at the next survey and on the next day.
Of 37 participants, 15 (41 %) reported engaging in LOC eating. Participants with LOC eating more frequently endorsed several forms of restraint and restriction versus participants without LOC eating. Attempting to avoid enjoyable foods and attempting to limit eating at one survey predicted greater likelihood of LOC eating at the next survey.
Findings suggest that attempted restraint, but not actual restriction, was associated with LOC eating. Research should explore additional factors that may influence these relationships, which could inform weight control treatments that address restraint/restriction.
本研究旨在:1)比较寻求体重控制的有无失控性进食(LOC)的青少年之间的饮食限制和限制率;2)检验限制/限制与 LOC 进食之间的时间关系。
37 名寻求体重控制的青少年(平均年龄:15.4±1.5;62%为白人;57%为女性;平均 BMI 百分位数=97.3±3.1)完成了一周的生态瞬间评估方案,并在开始体重控制干预之前报告了饮食限制/限制和饮食行为。卡方检验检查了有无 LOC 进食的参与者之间限制/限制频率的差异。多层次模型检验了饮食限制/限制与下一次调查和下一天 LOC 进食之间的关联。
在 37 名参与者中,有 15 名(41%)报告有 LOC 进食。与无 LOC 进食的参与者相比,有 LOC 进食的参与者更频繁地表示有几种形式的限制和限制。试图避免美味的食物和试图限制在一次调查中的进食量,预测在下一次调查中更有可能出现 LOC 进食。
研究结果表明,试图限制,而不是实际限制,与 LOC 进食有关。研究应探讨可能影响这些关系的其他因素,这可以为解决限制/限制的体重控制治疗提供信息。