• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与来自两个截然不同环境的蜜蜂觅食者相关的细菌群落的组成和多样性。

Composition and diversity of bacterial communities associated with honey bee foragers from two contrasting environments.

机构信息

Department of Animal Diversity and Resources, Institute of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Research, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, 1113 Sofia, Bulgaria.

Department of Ecosystem Research, Environmental Risk Assessment and Conservation Biology, Institute of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Research, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, 1113 Sofia, Bulgaria.

出版信息

Bull Entomol Res. 2023 Oct;113(5):693-702. doi: 10.1017/S0007485323000378. Epub 2023 Aug 7.

DOI:10.1017/S0007485323000378
PMID:37545319
Abstract

The honey bee is associated with a diverse community of microbes (viruses, bacteria, fungi, and protists), commonly known as the microbiome. Here, we present data on honey bee microbiota from two localities having different surrounding landscapes - mountain (the Rhodope Mountains) and lowland (the Danube plain). The bacterial communities of abdomen of adult bees were studied using amplicon sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene. The composition and dominance structure and their variability within and between localities, alpha and beta diversity, and core and differential taxa were compared at different hierarchical levels (operational taxonomic units to phylum). Seven genera (, , , , , , and ), known to include core gut-associated phylotypes or species clusters, dominated (92-100%) the bacterial assemblages. Significant variations were found in taxa distribution across both geographical regions and within each apiary. (Firmicutes) prevailed significantly in the mountain locality followed by and (Proteobacteria). Bacteria of four genera, core ( and ) and non-core ( and ), dominated the bee-associated assemblages of the Danube plain locality. Several ubiquitous bacterial genera (e.g., , , and ), some species known also as potential and opportunistic bee pathogens, had been found in the lowland locality. Beta diversity analyses confirmed the observed differences in the bacterial communities from both localities. The occurrence of non-core taxa contributes substantially to higher microbial richness and diversity in bees from the Danube plain locality. We assume that the observed differences in the microbiota of honey bees from both apiaries are due to a combination of factors specific for each region. The surrounding landscape features of both localities and related vegetation, anthropogenic impact and land use intensity, the beekeeping management practices, and bee health status might all contribute to observed differences in bee microbiota traits.

摘要

蜜蜂与多样化的微生物群落(病毒、细菌、真菌和原生动物)相关联,通常被称为微生物组。在这里,我们提供了来自两个具有不同周围景观的地点(山区(罗多彼山脉)和低地(多瑙河平原))的蜜蜂微生物组数据。使用 16S rRNA 基因的扩增子测序研究了成年蜜蜂腹部的细菌群落。在不同的层次结构(操作分类单位到门)上比较了细菌群落的组成、优势结构及其在地点内和地点间的变异性、α和β多样性以及核心和差异分类群。已知包括核心肠道相关型或物种群的七个属(、、、、、和)主导(92-100%)细菌组合。在两个地理区域和每个蜂场中都发现了分类群分布的显著变化。(厚壁菌门)在山区显著占优势,其次是和(变形菌门)。四个属的细菌,核心(和)和非核心(和),在多瑙河平原地点主导着与蜜蜂相关的组合。在低地地点发现了一些普遍存在的细菌属(例如、、和),其中一些物种也被认为是潜在的和机会性的蜜蜂病原体。β多样性分析证实了两个地点的细菌群落存在差异。非核心分类群的出现对多瑙河平原地区蜜蜂的微生物丰富度和多样性有很大贡献。我们假设两个蜂场的蜜蜂微生物组存在差异是由于每个地区特定因素的综合作用。两个地点的周围景观特征及其相关植被、人为影响和土地利用强度、养蜂管理实践以及蜜蜂的健康状况都可能导致蜜蜂微生物组特征的差异。

相似文献

1
Composition and diversity of bacterial communities associated with honey bee foragers from two contrasting environments.与来自两个截然不同环境的蜜蜂觅食者相关的细菌群落的组成和多样性。
Bull Entomol Res. 2023 Oct;113(5):693-702. doi: 10.1017/S0007485323000378. Epub 2023 Aug 7.
2
Microbial ensemble in the hives: deciphering the intricate gut ecosystem of hive and forager bees of Apis mellifera.蜂群中的微生物群落:解析蜜蜂蜜蜂和采集蜂肠道生态系统的复杂性。
Mol Biol Rep. 2024 Feb 1;51(1):262. doi: 10.1007/s11033-024-09239-5.
3
Distinct gut microbiota profiles of Asian honey bee (Apis cerana) foragers.亚洲蜜蜂(Apis cerana)采集蜂的独特肠道微生物群特征。
Arch Microbiol. 2022 Feb 22;204(3):187. doi: 10.1007/s00203-022-02800-5.
4
Gut and Whole-Body Microbiota of the Honey Bee Separate Thriving and Non-thriving Hives.蜜蜂的肠道和全身微生物群可区分健康蜂群和非健康蜂群。
Microb Ecol. 2019 Jul;78(1):195-205. doi: 10.1007/s00248-018-1287-9. Epub 2018 Nov 22.
5
Characterization of the Kenyan Honey Bee () Gut Microbiota: A First Look at Tropical and Sub-Saharan African Bee Associated Microbiomes.肯尼亚蜜蜂()肠道微生物群的特征:对热带和撒哈拉以南非洲蜜蜂相关微生物组的初步观察。
Microorganisms. 2020 Nov 3;8(11):1721. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms8111721.
6
Colonization of the gut microbiota of honey bee (Apis mellifera) workers at different developmental stages.在不同发育阶段的蜜蜂(Apis mellifera)工蜂的肠道微生物群的定植。
Microbiol Res. 2020 Jan;231:126370. doi: 10.1016/j.micres.2019.126370. Epub 2019 Nov 7.
7
Honey bees and bumble bees occupying the same landscape have distinct gut microbiomes and amplicon sequence variant-level responses to infections.在同一景观中占据的蜜蜂蜜蜂和熊蜂具有明显不同的肠道微生物组,并且对感染的扩增子序列变异水平的反应也不同。
PeerJ. 2023 Jun 9;11:e15501. doi: 10.7717/peerj.15501. eCollection 2023.
8
Changes in the Bacteriome of Honey Bees Associated with the Parasite Varroa destructor, and Pathogens Nosema and Lotmaria passim.与寄生螨类瓦螨、微孢子虫属病原体以及广泛存在的洛特马利亚菌相关的蜜蜂细菌群落变化。
Microb Ecol. 2017 Apr;73(3):685-698. doi: 10.1007/s00248-016-0869-7. Epub 2016 Oct 11.
9
Genetic divergence and functional convergence of gut bacteria between the Eastern honey bee and the Western honey bee .东方蜜蜂和西方蜜蜂肠道细菌的遗传分化和功能趋同。
J Adv Res. 2021 Aug 10;37:19-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jare.2021.08.002. eCollection 2022 Mar.
10
Honey bee microbiome associated with different hive and sample types over a honey production season.在一个蜂蜜生产季节中,不同蜂箱和样本类型与蜜蜂微生物组的关系。
PLoS One. 2019 Nov 8;14(11):e0223834. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223834. eCollection 2019.

引用本文的文献

1
A Review of Diet and Foraged Pollen Interactions with the Honeybee Gut Microbiome.饮食与采集花粉与蜜蜂肠道微生物群相互作用的综述
Microb Ecol. 2025 May 27;88(1):54. doi: 10.1007/s00248-025-02551-y.