Willig Michael R, Presley Steven J
Institute of the Environment, Center for Environmental Sciences & Engineering, and Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut 06269-4210, USA.
J Mammal. 2023 Mar 31;104(4):752-769. doi: 10.1093/jmammal/gyad032. eCollection 2023 Aug 1.
Natural selection should favor individuals that synchronize energy-demanding aspects of reproductive activity with periods of high resource abundance and predictability, leading to seasonal patterns of reproduction at the population level. Nonetheless, few studies-especially those on bats in the Neotropics-have used rigorous quantitative criteria to distinguish among phenological patterns for different populations from the same habitat or for the same species in different habitats. To explore such issues, we quantified annual patterns of reproduction in male and in female bats from lowland Amazonia (environs of Iquitos, Peru), and did so at the level of populations and ensembles. Five species exhibited unimodal patterns including , , , , and . Two species ( and ) evinced bimodal patterns with reproductive peaks separated by patterns of inactivity, whereas four species (, , , and ) evinced a bimodal pattern in which peaks in activity occur in tandem, with the first peak generally markedly higher than the second peak. Frugivore, gleaning animalivore, and nectarivore ensembles exhibited bimodal, unimodal, and bimodal reproductive phenologies, respectively. Nonetheless, interannual variation in phenology (i.e., the monthly timing of peaks within a season rather than the number of peaks per year) characterized four (, , , and ) of the eight species and each of the three ensembles (frugivores, gleaning animalivores, and nectarivores) with adequate sampling. Regardless of interspecific variation in strategies, the phenology of reproduction enhances the likelihood that parturition and recruitment of young into the population occurs during the wet season, the period of likely highest resource abundance. Based on a comparison of our results with those from other well-studied bat populations, four species did not exhibit geographic variation in reproductive phenologies (, , , and ), whereas three species evinced such geographic variation (, , and ). Climate change will likely alter the seasons and extents of propitious times for reproductive activities, as well as the reliability of proximate cues for initiating reproduction, compromising current reproductive strategies and leading to altered phenological patterns of reproduction or reproductive success, possibly resulting in local extinction of some species.
自然选择应青睐那些将繁殖活动中需要能量的方面与资源丰富且可预测的时期同步的个体,从而在种群水平上形成季节性繁殖模式。然而,很少有研究——尤其是那些关于新热带地区蝙蝠的研究——使用严格的定量标准来区分同一栖息地不同种群或不同栖息地同一物种的物候模式。为了探究此类问题,我们对来自低地亚马逊地区(秘鲁伊基托斯周边)的雄性和雌性蝙蝠的年度繁殖模式进行了量化,并且是在种群和总体水平上进行的。五个物种呈现单峰模式,包括 、 、 、 和 。两个物种( 和 )表现出双峰模式,繁殖高峰被不活动期隔开,而四个物种( 、 、 和 )表现出双峰模式,其中活动高峰同时出现,第一个高峰通常明显高于第二个高峰。食果动物、食虫动物和食蜜动物总体分别呈现双峰、单峰和双峰繁殖物候。尽管如此,物候的年际变化(即一个季节内高峰出现的月份时间而非每年的高峰数量)在有足够样本的八个物种中的四个( 、 、 和 )以及三个总体(食果动物、食虫动物和食蜜动物)中都有体现。无论策略上的种间差异如何,繁殖物候增加了种群中分娩和幼崽出生在雨季的可能性,雨季可能是资源最丰富的时期。基于将我们的结果与其他深入研究的蝙蝠种群的结果进行比较,四个物种在繁殖物候上没有表现出地理差异( 、 、 和 ),而三个物种表现出这种地理差异( 、 和 )。气候变化可能会改变繁殖活动的季节和有利时间范围,以及启动繁殖的近端线索的可靠性,损害当前的繁殖策略,导致繁殖物候模式或繁殖成功率改变,可能导致一些物种在当地灭绝。