• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

台湾版协作实践评估工具的信效度:一项初步研究。

Reliability and validity of the Taiwanese version of the collaborative practice assessment tool: A pilot study.

作者信息

Ho Chen-Pei, Yeh Hsiu-Chen, Lee Ming-Shinn, Cheng Wei-Chun

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy, Hualien Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, Hualien, Taiwan.

Holistic Education Center, Tzu Chi University of Science and Technology, Hualien, Taiwan.

出版信息

Tzu Chi Med J. 2023 Apr 13;35(3):267-276. doi: 10.4103/tcmj.tcmj_200_22. eCollection 2023 Jul-Sep.

DOI:10.4103/tcmj.tcmj_200_22
PMID:37545791
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10399841/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To promote teamwork communication and collaboration between health-care professionals, educators emphasized proper training programs to develop interprofessional collaborative practice (IPCP) among postgraduate (PG) trainees. A literature review indicated that the faculty necessarily measured the competency in IPCP with structured and applicable assessment tools in collocation to training programs domestically. A cross-sectional psychometric study was conducted to construct a reliable assessment tool for measuring PG learning outcome in Taiwan through a bidirectional translation. The study aimed to assess the interprofessional team behavior of trainees using the Taiwanese version of the collaborative practice assessment tool (T-CPAT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study recruited 43 participants to undergo a PG training program in a single institute and to complete T-CPAT. Data were analyzed using SPSS 22.0 software. We employed descriptive analysis of demographic variables. The validity of T-CPAT was analyzed by experts in different specialties and its availability was assessed by item-level analysis. Furthermore, the T-CPAT reliability was tested using Cronbach's α.

RESULTS

The average score was 305.2 (standard deviation = 38.08), and the expert validity of the T-CPAT was 0.96. In the item-level analysis, there were no failure items in T-CAPT. Cronbach's α reached 0.94 (95% confidence interval = 0.90-0.96).

CONCLUSION

The study demonstrated good reliability and validity for the T-CPAT. Thus, the T-CPAT can be used to accurately measure and assess the competence of IPCP in PG trainees in general medicine in Taiwan. The results were deemed sufficient to provide faculties with related arrangements for future teaching plans.

摘要

目的

为促进医护专业人员之间的团队沟通与协作,教育工作者强调应开展适当的培训项目,以培养研究生学员的跨专业协作实践(IPCP)能力。一项文献综述表明,在国内,教师必须使用结构化且适用的评估工具来衡量IPCP方面的能力,并与培训项目相结合。本研究开展了一项横断面心理测量学研究,旨在通过双向翻译构建一种可靠的评估工具,以测量台湾地区研究生的学习成果。该研究旨在使用台湾版协作实践评估工具(T-CPAT)评估学员的跨专业团队行为。

材料与方法

本研究招募了43名参与者,他们在一所机构参加研究生培训项目并完成T-CPAT。使用SPSS 22.0软件对数据进行分析。我们对人口统计学变量进行了描述性分析。由不同专业的专家分析T-CPAT的效度,并通过项目层面分析评估其可用性。此外,使用Cronbach's α检验T-CPAT的信度。

结果

平均得分是305.2(标准差 = 38.08),T-CPAT的专家效度为0.96。在项目层面分析中,T-CAPT没有不合格项目。Cronbach's α达到0.94(95%置信区间 = 0.90 - 0.96)。

结论

该研究表明T-CPAT具有良好的信度和效度。因此,T-CPAT可用于准确测量和评估台湾地区普通医学专业研究生学员的IPCP能力。研究结果足以供教师为未来的教学计划做出相关安排。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/620b/10399841/79df3dafe91b/TCMJ-35-267-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/620b/10399841/79df3dafe91b/TCMJ-35-267-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/620b/10399841/79df3dafe91b/TCMJ-35-267-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Reliability and validity of the Taiwanese version of the collaborative practice assessment tool: A pilot study.台湾版协作实践评估工具的信效度:一项初步研究。
Tzu Chi Med J. 2023 Apr 13;35(3):267-276. doi: 10.4103/tcmj.tcmj_200_22. eCollection 2023 Jul-Sep.
2
An evaluation of the psychometric properties of the Australian Collaborative Practice Assessment Tool.澳大利亚协作实践评估工具的心理计量特性评估。
PLoS One. 2024 May 9;19(5):e0302834. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302834. eCollection 2024.
3
Collaboration cognizance: Development of a self-assessment tool to measure intra-professional collaborative practices (IPCP) in postgraduate medical residents at tertiary care hospitals.协作认知:一种测量三级医院研究生住院医师专业间协作实践(IPCP)的自我评估工具的开发。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Jul 19;24(1):771. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05759-7.
4
[Development of the Japanese version Care Planning Assessment Tool (J-CPAT): reliability and validity studies].
Nihon Ronen Igakkai Zasshi. 2008 May;45(3):323-9. doi: 10.3143/geriatrics.45.323.
5
Development and Evaluation of an Interprofessional Collaborative Practice Module for the Tracheostomy Procedure for Improved Patient Care.开发并评估用于气管造口术的跨专业协作实践模块以改善患者护理
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022 Jun;74(2):225-233. doi: 10.1007/s12070-021-03041-6. Epub 2022 Jan 6.
6
Pain assessment in nursing home residents with dementia: psychometric properties and clinical utility of the CNA Pain Assessment Tool (CPAT).痴呆症疗养院居民的疼痛评估:CNA疼痛评估工具(CPAT)的心理测量特性和临床效用。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2009 Sep;10(7):505-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2009.05.011. Epub 2009 Aug 7.
7
Measuring interprofessional education and collaborative practice competencies: a content validity study of the Jefferson Teamwork Observation Guide®.测量医学生团队合作能力和协作实践能力:杰斐逊团队协作观察指南®的内容效度研究。
J Interprof Care. 2022 Sep-Oct;36(5):691-697. doi: 10.1080/13561820.2021.1972946. Epub 2021 Oct 1.
8
Conceptualizing Interprofessional Teams as Multi-Team Systems-Implications for Assessment and Training.将跨专业团队概念化为多团队系统——对评估和培训的启示
Teach Learn Med. 2015;27(4):366-9. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2015.1077136.
9
Evaluation of a clinical performance assessment tool (CPAT) within a critical care context.在重症监护环境中对临床绩效评估工具(CPAT)的评估。
Aust Crit Care. 2006 Aug;19(3):105-13. doi: 10.1016/s1036-7314(06)80005-6.
10
Development of a Japanese version of the care planning assessment tool.
Australas J Ageing. 2010 Mar;29(1):27-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-6612.2009.00379.x.

引用本文的文献

1
A psychometric evaluation of the Indonesian version of the collaborative practice assessment tool (CPAT) for assessing interprofessional education and collaborative practice among health practitioners and students.对印度尼西亚语版协作实践评估工具(CPAT)进行心理测量评估,以评估卫生从业人员和学生之间的跨专业教育与协作实践。
Narra J. 2024 Dec;4(3):e1106. doi: 10.52225/narra.v4i3.1106. Epub 2024 Oct 20.
2
An evaluation of the psychometric properties of the Australian Collaborative Practice Assessment Tool.澳大利亚协作实践评估工具的心理计量特性评估。
PLoS One. 2024 May 9;19(5):e0302834. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302834. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Interdisciplinary Health Care Evaluation Instruments: A Review of Psychometric Evidence.跨学科医疗保健评估工具:心理测量学证据综述。
Eval Health Prof. 2022 Sep;45(3):223-234. doi: 10.1177/01632787211040859. Epub 2021 Aug 19.
2
Interprofessional simulation to promote teamwork and communication between nursing and respiratory therapy students: A mixed-method research study.跨专业模拟以促进护理专业与呼吸治疗专业学生之间的团队合作与沟通:一项混合方法研究。
Nurse Educ Today. 2021 Apr;99:104816. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2021.104816. Epub 2021 Feb 11.
3
Development of accreditation standards for interprofessional education: a Canadian Case Study.
制定跨专业教育认证标准:加拿大案例研究。
Hum Resour Health. 2021 Jan 20;19(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s12960-020-00551-2.
4
A Systematic Review of Assessment Tools Measuring Interprofessional Education Outcomes Relevant to Pharmacy Education.测量与药学教育相关的跨专业教育成果的评估工具的系统评价
Am J Pharm Educ. 2017 Aug;81(6):119. doi: 10.5688/ajpe816119.
5
Using an interprofessional competency framework to examine collaborative practice.使用跨专业能力框架来审视协作实践。
J Interprof Care. 2015 Mar;29(2):131-7. doi: 10.3109/13561820.2014.955910. Epub 2014 Sep 10.
6
Interprofessional education: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes (update).跨专业教育:对专业实践和医疗保健结果的影响(更新版)
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Mar 28;2013(3):CD002213. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002213.pub3.
7
Development and pilot testing of the collaborative practice assessment tool.协同实践评估工具的开发和试点测试。
J Interprof Care. 2011 May;25(3):189-95. doi: 10.3109/13561820.2010.532620. Epub 2010 Dec 23.
8
Relationships between beliefs about medications and adherence.关于药物的信念与依从性之间的关系。
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2009 Apr 1;66(7):657-64. doi: 10.2146/ajhp080064.
9
The content validity index: are you sure you know what's being reported? Critique and recommendations.内容效度指数:你确定你知道所报告的内容吗?评论与建议。
Res Nurs Health. 2006 Oct;29(5):489-97. doi: 10.1002/nur.20147.
10
[A two-stage translation and test the validity and reliability of a foreign instrument].[对国外工具进行两阶段翻译并测试其有效性和可靠性]
Hu Li Za Zhi. 2006 Feb;53(1):65-71.