Shrader Sarah, Farland Michelle Z, Danielson Jennifer, Sicat Brigitte, Umland Elena M
University of Kansas School of Pharmacy, Lawrence, Kansas.
University of Florida College of Pharmacy, Gainesville, Florida.
Am J Pharm Educ. 2017 Aug;81(6):119. doi: 10.5688/ajpe816119.
To identify and describe the available quantitative tools that assess interprofessional education (IPE) relevant to pharmacy education. A systematic approach was used to identify quantitative IPE assessment tools relevant to pharmacy education. The search strategy included the National Center for Interprofessional Practice and Education Resource Exchange (Nexus) website, a systematic search of the literature, and a manual search of journals deemed likely to include relevant tools. The search identified a total of 44 tools from the Nexus website, 158 abstracts from the systematic literature search, and 570 abstracts from the manual search. A total of 36 assessment tools met the criteria to be included in the summary, and their application to IPE relevant to pharmacy education was discussed. Each of the tools has advantages and disadvantages. No single comprehensive tool exists to fulfill assessment needs. However, numerous tools are available that can be mapped to IPE-related accreditation standards for pharmacy education.
识别并描述可用于评估与药学教育相关的跨专业教育(IPE)的定量工具。采用系统方法来识别与药学教育相关的定量IPE评估工具。检索策略包括国家跨专业实践与教育资源交流中心(Nexus)网站、文献的系统检索以及对可能包含相关工具的期刊进行手工检索。检索从Nexus网站共识别出44种工具,从系统文献检索中识别出158篇摘要,从手工检索中识别出570篇摘要。共有36种评估工具符合纳入总结的标准,并讨论了它们在与药学教育相关的IPE中的应用。每种工具都有优缺点。不存在单一的综合工具来满足评估需求。然而,有许多工具可用于对照药学教育与IPE相关的认证标准。