• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The Swedish COVID-19 approach: a scientific dialogue on mitigation policies.瑞典的 COVID-19 应对措施:缓解政策的科学对话。
Front Public Health. 2023 Jul 20;11:1206732. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1206732. eCollection 2023.
2
Leveraging epidemiological principles to evaluate Sweden's COVID-19 response.利用流行病学原理评估瑞典的 COVID-19 应对措施。
Ann Epidemiol. 2021 Feb;54:21-26. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2020.11.005. Epub 2020 Nov 23.
3
High excess deaths in Sweden during the first wave of COVID-19: Policy deficiencies or 'dry tinder'?高超额死亡率在瑞典在 COVID-19 的第一波期间:政策缺陷还是“干柴”?
Scand J Public Health. 2022 Feb;50(1):33-37. doi: 10.1177/14034948211027818. Epub 2021 Jul 2.
4
Mortality in Norway and Sweden during the COVID-19 pandemic 2020-22: A comparative study.2020-22 年新冠大流行期间挪威和瑞典的死亡率:一项比较研究。
J Infect Public Health. 2024 Apr;17(4):719-726. doi: 10.1016/j.jiph.2023.10.033. Epub 2023 Nov 3.
5
Pandemic lockdown, healthcare policies and human rights: integrating opposed views on COVID-19 public health mitigation measures.大流行封锁、医疗保健政策和人权:整合对 COVID-19 公共卫生缓解措施的相反观点。
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2020 Dec 30;21(4):509-516. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm.2020.04.274.
6
COVID-19 healthcare demand and mortality in Sweden in response to non-pharmaceutical mitigation and suppression scenarios.瑞典针对非药物缓解和抑制情景的 COVID-19 医疗需求和死亡率。
Int J Epidemiol. 2020 Oct 1;49(5):1443-1453. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyaa121.
7
Low numbers of COVID-19 in Swedish pediatric oncology patients during the first pandemic year despite an open society.尽管瑞典是一个开放的社会,但在首个大流行年,瑞典儿科肿瘤患者中的 COVID-19 病例数量较低。
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2022 Oct;69(10):e29750. doi: 10.1002/pbc.29750. Epub 2022 Apr 29.
8
Public health, surveillance policies and actions to prevent community spread of COVID-19 in Denmark, Serbia and Sweden.丹麦、塞尔维亚和瑞典的公共卫生、监测政策和行动,以预防 COVID-19 在社区的传播。
Scand J Public Health. 2022 Aug;50(6):711-729. doi: 10.1177/14034948211056215. Epub 2021 Nov 29.
9
Implementation of a broad public health approach to COVID-19 in Sweden, January 2020 to May 2022.2020 年 1 月至 2022 年 5 月期间瑞典对 COVID-19 实施广泛的公共卫生措施。
Euro Surveill. 2023 Oct;28(41). doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2023.28.41.2300063.
10
Policy stringency and mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic: a longitudinal analysis of data from 15 countries.政策严格程度与新冠大流行期间的心理健康:来自 15 个国家的纵向数据分析。
Lancet Public Health. 2022 May;7(5):e417-e426. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(22)00060-3. Epub 2022 Apr 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Increased Risk of Type 1 Diabetes in Boys Under the Age of 5 Years During COVID-19 Lockdowns in Finland, Sweden and Stanford, CA, USA-An Observational Multicenter Study.芬兰、瑞典及美国加利福尼亚州斯坦福市新冠疫情封锁期间5岁以下男童1型糖尿病风险增加——一项多中心观察性研究
Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2025 Sep;41(6):e70084. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.70084.
2
Unravelling the roadblocks and pathways to adolescents' physical activity.剖析青少年身体活动的障碍与途径。
Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2025 Dec;20(1):2524270. doi: 10.1080/17482631.2025.2524270. Epub 2025 Jul 1.
3
What Lessons can Be Learned From the Management of the COVID-19 Pandemic?从新冠疫情管理中可以吸取哪些教训?
Int J Public Health. 2025 May 30;70:1607727. doi: 10.3389/ijph.2025.1607727. eCollection 2025.
4
The impact of telework allowance and utilization on physiological and perceived stress among Swedish white-collar workers.远程工作津贴及使用情况对瑞典白领生理压力和感知压力的影响。
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2025 Sep 1;51(5):404-412. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.4234. Epub 2025 May 28.
5
SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine-Induced Humoral Immunity in Immunocompetent European Adults: A Systematic Review.免疫功能正常的欧洲成年人中SARS-CoV-2疫苗诱导的体液免疫:一项系统评价
Microorganisms. 2025 Feb 27;13(3):535. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms13030535.
6
Outcomes of the COVID-19 pandemic in chronic lymphocytic leukemia: focus on the very early period and Omicron era.慢性淋巴细胞白血病中新冠疫情的结果:聚焦极早期和奥密克戎时代。
Blood Adv. 2025 Jul 8;9(13):3170-3181. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2024015260.
7
Changes in epinephrine dispensings and allergy hospitalisations in Sweden in the years following the removal of autoinjector co-payments.瑞典取消自动注射器自付费用后的几年里肾上腺素配给量和过敏住院情况的变化。
Front Allergy. 2024 Aug 16;5:1434461. doi: 10.3389/falgy.2024.1434461. eCollection 2024.
8
Putting Meta-Analysis Findings in Proper Perspective: Comment on "The Effects of Nonpharmaceutical Interventions on COVID-19 Cases, Hospitalizations, and Mortality: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis".正确看待荟萃分析结果:评《非药物干预对新冠病毒病病例、住院率和死亡率的影响:系统文献综述与荟萃分析》
AJPM Focus. 2024 Mar 11;3(3):100223. doi: 10.1016/j.focus.2024.100223. eCollection 2024 Jun.
9
Effects of COVID-19-targeted non-pharmaceutical interventions on pediatric hospital admissions in North Italian hospitals, 2017 to 2022: a quasi-experimental study interrupted time-series analysis.2017年至2022年意大利北部医院针对新冠疫情的非药物干预措施对儿科住院情况的影响:一项中断时间序列分析的准实验研究
Front Public Health. 2024 Apr 18;12:1393677. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1393677. eCollection 2024.
10
COVID-19-associated mortality in individuals with serious mental disorders in Sweden during the first two years of the pandemic- a population-based register study.COVID-19 相关死亡率在瑞典严重精神障碍个体中在大流行的头两年-一项基于人群的登记研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2024 Mar 7;24(1):189. doi: 10.1186/s12888-024-05629-y.

本文引用的文献

1
Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses.物理干预措施以阻断或减少呼吸道病毒的传播。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jan 30;1(1):CD006207. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006207.pub6.
2
The Swedish COVID-19 control measures and the national commission report.瑞典的新冠疫情防控措施及国家委员会报告。
Acta Paediatr. 2023 Jan;112(1):8-10. doi: 10.1111/apa.16582. Epub 2022 Nov 3.
3
Correction: Evaluation of science advice during the COVID-19 pandemic in Sweden.更正:瑞典新冠疫情期间科学建议的评估
Humanit Soc Sci Commun. 2022;9(1):239. doi: 10.1057/s41599-022-01254-w. Epub 2022 Jul 15.
4
Mortality in Norway and Sweden during the COVID-19 pandemic.挪威和瑞典在 COVID-19 大流行期间的死亡率。
Scand J Public Health. 2022 Feb;50(1):38-45. doi: 10.1177/14034948211047137. Epub 2021 Oct 5.
5
Polarisation, incivility, and scientific debate during covid-19-an essay by Agnes Arnold-Forster.新冠疫情期间的两极分化、不文明行为与科学辩论——阿格尼斯·阿诺德-福斯特的一篇文章
BMJ. 2021 Aug 24;374:n1888. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n1888.
6
The Swedish COVID-19 strategy revisited.瑞典的新冠疫情应对策略再审视。
Lancet. 2021 May 1;397(10285):1619. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00885-0. Epub 2021 Apr 19.
7
Corona Pandemic: Assisted Isolation and Care to Protect Vulnerable Populations May Allow Us to Shorten the Universal Lock-Down and Gradually Re-open Society.新冠疫情:通过辅助隔离和护理来保护弱势群体,或许能让我们缩短全面封锁时间,并逐步重新开放社会。
Front Public Health. 2020 Sep 30;8:562901. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.562901. eCollection 2020.
8
Children are unlikely to be the main drivers of the COVID-19 pandemic - A systematic review.儿童不太可能成为 COVID-19 大流行的主要驱动因素——系统评价。
Acta Paediatr. 2020 Aug;109(8):1525-1530. doi: 10.1111/apa.15371. Epub 2020 Jun 17.
9
Systematic review of COVID-19 in children shows milder cases and a better prognosis than adults.系统回顾儿童 COVID-19 病例表明,其症状比成人轻,预后也更好。
Acta Paediatr. 2020 Jun;109(6):1088-1095. doi: 10.1111/apa.15270. Epub 2020 Apr 14.
10
Economic downturns, universal health coverage, and cancer mortality in high-income and middle-income countries, 1990-2010: a longitudinal analysis.经济衰退、全民健康覆盖与高收入和中等收入国家的癌症死亡率(1990-2010 年):纵向分析。
Lancet. 2016 Aug 13;388(10045):684-95. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00577-8. Epub 2016 May 25.

瑞典的 COVID-19 应对措施:缓解政策的科学对话。

The Swedish COVID-19 approach: a scientific dialogue on mitigation policies.

机构信息

Department of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

Department of Infectious Diseases, University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg, Sweden.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2023 Jul 20;11:1206732. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1206732. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2023.1206732
PMID:37546333
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10399217/
Abstract

During the COVID-19 pandemic, Sweden was among the few countries that did not enforce strict lockdown measures but instead relied more on voluntary and sustainable mitigation recommendations. While supported by the majority of Swedes, this approach faced rapid and continuous criticism. Unfortunately, the respectful debate centered around scientific evidence often gave way to mudslinging. However, the available data on excess all-cause mortality rates indicate that Sweden experienced fewer deaths per population unit during the pandemic (2020-2022) than most high-income countries and was comparable to neighboring Nordic countries through the pandemic. An open, objective scientific dialogue is essential for learning and preparing for future outbreaks.

摘要

在 COVID-19 大流行期间,瑞典是少数几个没有实施严格封锁措施的国家之一,而是更多地依赖自愿和可持续的缓解建议。虽然这种方法得到了大多数瑞典人的支持,但它也面临着迅速和持续的批评。不幸的是,围绕科学证据的尊重性辩论常常让位于相互指责。然而,关于全因死亡率的可用数据表明,瑞典在大流行期间(2020-2022 年)的每人口单位死亡人数比大多数高收入国家都要少,并且与大流行期间的北欧邻国相当。进行开放、客观的科学对话对于学习和为未来的疫情爆发做好准备至关重要。