Kathofer Maximilian, Lamm Claus, Leder Helmut, Crone Julia Sophia
Vienna Cognitive Science Hub, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Social, Cognitive, and Affective Neuroscience Unit, Department of Cognition, Emotion, and Methods in Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
iScience. 2025 May 5;28(6):112588. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2025.112588. eCollection 2025 Jun 20.
Studies suggest that vivid mental imagery can blur the boundaries between reality and imagination in simple detection tasks by eliciting similar neural patterns. The question arises as to whether aesthetic experiences can similarly emerge through imagery or whether these complex experiences necessitate direct input into the sensory system. Alternating between visually perceiving and reimagining encountered stimuli, 34 participants rated faces and artworks across aesthetic dimensions. While slightly less potent, imagery is equally sufficient in evoking aesthetic experiences, and for highly vivid imaginations, evoked experiences even become behaviorally indistinguishable across conditions. Yet, representational similarity analysis reveals distinct neural patterns across conditions as the brain mainly encodes stimulus modality, even in areas canonically associated with aesthetic processing. Thus, although evoked experiences might be behaviorally identical across modalities during highly vivid trials, neural patterns differ substantially due to differences in modality, as evoked experiences are only marginally encoded.
研究表明,生动的心理意象在简单的检测任务中,通过引发相似的神经模式,会模糊现实与想象之间的界限。问题在于,审美体验是否能同样通过意象产生,或者这些复杂体验是否需要直接输入感觉系统。34名参与者在视觉感知和重新想象所遇到的刺激之间交替,对人脸和艺术作品进行审美维度的评分。虽然意象的效果稍弱,但同样足以唤起审美体验,对于高度生动的想象,所唤起的体验在不同条件下甚至在行为上变得难以区分。然而,表征相似性分析揭示了不同条件下不同的神经模式,因为大脑主要对刺激模态进行编码,即使在通常与审美处理相关的区域也是如此。因此,尽管在高度生动的试验中,不同模态所唤起的体验在行为上可能相同,但由于模态的差异,神经模式有很大不同,因为所唤起的体验只是被少量编码。