Brandts Julia, Bray Sarah, Villa Guillermo, Catapano Alberico L, Poulter Neil R, Vallejo-Vaz Antonio J, Ray Kausik K
Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial Centre for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2023 Jun 8;31:100665. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2023.100665. eCollection 2023 Aug.
The impact of the stepwise implementation of the 2019 European Society of Cardiology (ESC)/European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS) treatment algorithm on low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goal attainment was simulated in patients from the DA VINCI study.
Monte Carlo simulation was used to evaluate treatment optimisation scenarios, based on a patient's risk category: statin intensification (step 1), addition of ezetimibe (step 2), and addition of a proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitor (step 3). Residual cardiovascular risk and predicted relative and absolute risk reduction (RRR and ARR) in cardiovascular events were assessed.
In DA VINCI, 2482 patients did not achieve their 2019 ESC/EAS LDL-C goals and were included in the simulation. In patients without atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) ( = 962), 27.0% ( = 259) and 57.0% ( = 548 are likely to achieve their LDL-C goals at step 1 and step 2, respectively. Of those at very high risk without ASCVD ( = 74), 88.1% ( = 65) are likely to achieve their LDL-C goals at step 3. In patients with ASCVD ( = 1520), 12.0% ( = 183), 42.1% ( = 641) and 93.2% ( = 1416) are likely to achieve their LDL-C goals at steps 1, 2 and 3, respectively. In patients with and without ASCVD, treatment optimisation may result in mean simulated RRR of 24.0% and 17.7%, respectively, and ARR of 8.1% and 2.6%, respectively.
Most patients at high cardiovascular risk are unlikely to achieve LDL-C goals through statin optimisation and ezetimibe, and will require a PCSK9 inhibitor, leading to greater reduction in cardiovascular risk.
Amgen.
在达·芬奇研究的患者中模拟了逐步实施2019年欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)/欧洲动脉粥样硬化学会(EAS)治疗算法对低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)目标达成情况的影响。
基于患者的风险类别,使用蒙特卡洛模拟来评估治疗优化方案:强化他汀类药物治疗(步骤1)、加用依折麦布(步骤2)以及加用前蛋白转化酶枯草溶菌素9型(PCSK9)抑制剂(步骤3)。评估残余心血管风险以及心血管事件的预测相对和绝对风险降低率(RRR和ARR)。
在达·芬奇研究中,2482例患者未达到2019年ESC/EAS的LDL-C目标并被纳入模拟。在无动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病(ASCVD)的患者(n = 962)中,分别有27.0%(n = 259)和57.0%(n = 548)可能在步骤1和步骤2时达到LDL-C目标。在无ASCVD的极高风险患者(n = 74)中,88.1%(n = 65)可能在步骤3时达到LDL-C目标。在有ASCVD的患者(n = 1520)中,分别有12.0%(n = 183)、42.1%(n = 641)和93.2%(n = 1416)可能在步骤1、步骤2和步骤3时达到LDL-C目标。在有和无ASCVD的患者中,治疗优化可能分别导致模拟RRR均值为24.0%和17.7%,ARR均值为8.1%和2.6%。
大多数心血管高风险患者不太可能通过他汀类药物优化和依折麦布实现LDL-C目标,将需要PCSK9抑制剂,从而更大程度地降低心血管风险。
安进公司。