Kalkowska Dominika A, Wassilak Steven Gf, Wiesen Eric, F Estivariz Concepcion, Burns Cara C, Badizadegan Kamran, Thompson Kimberly M
Kid Risk, Inc., Orlando, FL, USA.
Global Immunization Division, Center for Global Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Gates Open Res. 2023 Apr 17;7:55. doi: 10.12688/gatesopenres.14511.1. eCollection 2023.
The polio eradication endgame continues to increase in complexity. With polio cases caused by wild poliovirus type 1 and circulating vaccine-derived polioviruses of all three types (1, 2 and 3) reported in 2022, the number, formulation, and use of poliovirus vaccines poses challenges for national immunization programs and vaccine suppliers. Prior poliovirus transmission modeling of globally-coordinated type-specific cessation of oral poliovirus vaccine (OPV) assumed creation of Sabin monovalent OPV (mOPV) stockpiles for emergencies and explored the potential need to restart OPV if the world reached a specified cumulative threshold number of cases after OPV cessation. We document the actual experience of type 2 OPV (OPV2) cessation and reconsider prior modeling assumptions related to OPV restart. We develop updated decision trees of national immunization options for poliovirus vaccines considering different possibilities for OPV restart. While OPV restart represented a hypothetical situation for risk management and contingency planning to support the 2013-2018 Global Polio Eradication Initiative (GPEI) Strategic Plan, the actual epidemiological experience since OPV2 cessation raises questions about what, if any, trigger(s) could lead to restarting the use of OPV2 in routine immunization and/or plans for potential future restart of type 1 and 3 OPV after their respective cessation. The emergency use listing of a genetically stabilized novel type 2 OPV (nOPV2) and continued evaluation of nOPV for types 1 and/or 3 add further complexity by increasing the combinations of possible OPV formulations for OPV restart. Expanding on a 2019 discussion of the logistical challenges and implications of restarting OPV, we find a complex structure of the many options and many issues related to OPV restart decisions and policies as of early 2023. We anticipate many challenges for forecasting prospective vaccine supply needs during the polio endgame due to increasing potential combinations of poliovirus vaccine choices.
脊髓灰质炎根除工作的收官阶段愈发复杂。2022年报告了由1型野生脊髓灰质炎病毒以及所有三种类型(1、2和3型)的循环疫苗衍生脊髓灰质炎病毒引起的脊髓灰质炎病例,脊髓灰质炎病毒疫苗的数量、剂型和使用给国家免疫规划和疫苗供应商带来了挑战。此前全球协调的口服脊髓灰质炎病毒疫苗(OPV)特定类型停用的脊髓灰质炎病毒传播模型假定创建单价口服脊髓灰质炎病毒疫苗(mOPV)储备以应对紧急情况,并探讨了在停用OPV后世界达到指定的累计病例阈值数量时重启OPV的潜在需求。我们记录了2型OPV(OPV2)停用的实际经验,并重新审视了与OPV重启相关的先前模型假设。我们针对脊髓灰质炎病毒疫苗开发了更新的国家免疫选择决策树,考虑了OPV重启的不同可能性。虽然OPV重启是为支持2013 - 2018年全球脊髓灰质炎根除倡议(GPEI)战略计划而进行风险管理和应急规划的一种假设情况,但自OPV2停用以来的实际流行病学经验引发了关于何种触发因素(如果有的话)可能导致在常规免疫中重新使用OPV2以及/或者在1型和3型OPV各自停用后未来潜在重启计划的问题。一种基因稳定的新型2型OPV(nOPV2)的紧急使用授权以及对1型和/或3型nOPV的持续评估增加了OPV重启可能的剂型组合,进一步加剧了复杂性。在2019年对重启OPV的后勤挑战及影响的讨论基础上,我们发现截至2023年初,OPV重启决策和政策存在诸多选项且涉及众多问题,结构复杂。由于脊髓灰质炎病毒疫苗选择的潜在组合不断增加,我们预计在脊髓灰质炎根除收官阶段预测未来疫苗供应需求会面临诸多挑战。