Kid Risk, Inc., Orlando, FL, USA.
Risk Anal. 2021 Feb;41(2):364-375. doi: 10.1111/risa.13664.
The polio endgame remains complicated, with many questions about future polio vaccines and national immunization policies. We simulated possible future poliovirus vaccine routine immunization policies for countries stratified by World Bank Income Levels and estimated the expected costs and cases using an updated integrated dynamic poliovirus transmission, stochastic risk, and economic model. We consider two reference cases scenarios: one that achieves the eradication of all wild polioviruses (WPVs) by 2023 and one in which serotype 1 WPV (WPV1) transmission continues. The results show that the addition of inactivated poliovirus vaccine (IPV) to routine immunization in all countries substantially increased the expected costs of the polio endgame, without substantially increasing its expected health or economic benefits. Adding a second dose of IPV to the routine immunization schedules of countries that currently include a single IPV dose further increases costs and does not appear economically justified in the reference case that does not stop WPV transmission. For the reference case that includes all WPV eradication, adding a second IPV dose at the time of successful oral poliovirus vaccine (OPV) cessation represents a cost-effective option. The risks and costs of needing to restart OPV use change the economics of the polio endgame, although the time horizon used for modeling impacts the overall economic results. National health leaders will want to consider the expected health and economic net benefits of their national polio vaccine strategies recognizing that preferred strategies may differ.
脊髓灰质炎终局仍然很复杂,涉及到未来脊髓灰质炎疫苗和国家免疫政策的许多问题。我们按照世界银行收入水平对国家进行分层,模拟了未来可能的脊髓灰质炎病毒疫苗常规免疫政策,并使用更新的综合动力学脊髓灰质炎病毒传播、随机风险和经济模型来估计预期成本和病例。我们考虑了两种参考案例情景:一种是到 2023 年根除所有野生脊髓灰质炎病毒(WPV),另一种是血清型 1 WPV(WPV1)传播继续。结果表明,在所有国家常规免疫中添加灭活脊髓灰质炎病毒疫苗(IPV)会大大增加脊髓灰质炎终局的预期成本,而不会显著增加其预期的健康或经济效益。在目前包括单次 IPV 剂量的常规免疫计划的国家中增加第二剂 IPV 会进一步增加成本,在不停止 WPV 传播的参考案例中,这似乎没有经济上的合理性。对于包括所有 WPV 根除的参考案例,在成功停用口服脊髓灰质炎病毒疫苗(OPV)时添加第二剂 IPV 是一种具有成本效益的选择。需要重新启动 OPV 使用的风险和成本改变了脊髓灰质炎终局的经济学,尽管用于建模的时间范围会影响总体经济结果。国家卫生领导人将希望考虑其国家脊髓灰质炎疫苗策略的预期健康和经济净效益,认识到首选策略可能会有所不同。