Suppr超能文献

多模式粘合剂、两步自酸蚀粘合剂和全酸蚀系统对髓室底牙本质粘结效果的比较评价——一项研究

Comparative Evaluation of the Bonding Efficacy of Multimode Adhesive, Two-Step Self-Etch Adhesive, and a Total-Etch System to Pulpal Floor Dentin - An Study.

作者信息

Valsan Dhanya, Bhaskaran Sajeev, Mathew Joy, Hari Krishnan, Joy Joseph

机构信息

Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Sree Anjaneya Institute of Dental Sciences, Kozhikode, Kerala, India.

Consultant Endodontist, Ernakulam, Kerala, India.

出版信息

Contemp Clin Dent. 2023 Apr-Jun;14(2):104-108. doi: 10.4103/ccd.ccd_754_21. Epub 2023 Feb 7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Postendodontic restoration with composite resins has gained popularity due to the development of more reliable adhesives with simplified bonding procedures and less technique sensitivity. Pulpal floor dentin is a complex biological structure and a more challenging bonding substrate. Hence, appropriate selection of the bonding agent for these regions of the tooth is important.

AIMS

To compare the shear bond strength of a new generation of dental adhesives referred to as multimode adhesives, two-step self-etch adhesive, and a total-etch system to pulpal floor dentin.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixty human mandibular molars were sectioned with a slow speed diamond disc to expose the pulp chamber and divided into four groups of 15 teeth each, based on the bonding agent used. Group A: Single bond universal (self-etch); Group B: Single Bond Universal (etch-and-rinse), Group C: Clearfil SE Bond, Group D: Adper Single Bond 2. Using a split Teflon mold, composite cylinders were built on the prepared dentinal surfaces. The shear bond strength was then evaluated with the universal testing machine.

RESULTS

Two step self-etch adhesives recorded higher shear bond strength than total-etch and multimode/universal adhesives applied in both self-etch and etch-and-rinse techniques.

CONCLUSION

The self-etching/priming system bonded more strongly to the pulpal floor dentin than multimode adhesive and total-etch system.

摘要

背景

由于出现了更可靠的粘合剂,其粘结程序简化且技术敏感性降低,复合树脂进行根管治疗后的修复越来越受欢迎。髓室底牙本质是一种复杂的生物结构,也是更具挑战性的粘结基底。因此,为牙齿的这些区域选择合适的粘结剂很重要。

目的

比较新一代牙科粘合剂(即多模式粘合剂、两步自酸蚀粘合剂和全酸蚀系统)与髓室底牙本质之间的剪切粘结强度。

材料与方法

用慢速金刚石切割盘将60颗人下颌磨牙切开以暴露髓腔,并根据所使用的粘结剂分为四组,每组15颗牙。A组:单键通用型(自酸蚀);B组:单键通用型(酸蚀冲洗);C组:Clearfil SE Bond;D组:Adper单键2型。使用分体式聚四氟乙烯模具,在制备好的牙本质表面制作复合树脂圆柱体。然后用万能试验机评估剪切粘结强度。

结果

两步自酸蚀粘合剂的剪切粘结强度高于全酸蚀以及采用自酸蚀和酸蚀冲洗技术的多模式/通用粘合剂。

结论

自酸蚀/底漆系统与髓室底牙本质的粘结比多模式粘合剂和全酸蚀系统更强。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6584/10399809/5abbd5d43ddd/CCD-14-104-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验