Chiaraputt Sirichan, Chokwattanapornchai Nattida, Limchaikul Katanyoo, Paisarnkobrit Vibul, Sriamporn Tool
Department of Conservative Dentistry and Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Srinakharinwirot University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dental Medicine, Rangsit University, Prathum Thani, Thailand.
Int J Dent. 2023 Jul 29;2023:6660721. doi: 10.1155/2023/6660721. eCollection 2023.
This study aimed to evaluate the effects of aluminum chloride based hemostatic agents on the surface detail reproduction and dimension stability. Three impression materials were investigated after contaminated with three commercial astringents with different concentration of aluminum chloride. The specimens from three impression materials were fabricated with a stainless-steel mold that followed the American Dental Association specification no.19. The mold was preliminarily contaminated with three hemostatic agents racestyptine, Dryz, and Expasyl™-and 80 specimens from each impression material-polyvinylsiloxane (PVS), polyether, and polyvinylsiloxane ether (PVSE), were fabricated and subjected to each astringent. The surface detail reproduction was examined using a stereomicroscope at 4x magnification, and the dimensional stability was analyzed at 24 hr with a measuring microscope. The surface detail data were statistically analyzed with Fisher's test at a significance level of 0.05. The dimensional stability data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA and Tukey's test at a significance level of 0.05. Aluminum chloride hemostatic agents can affect the surface detail reproduction of impression materials differently ( < 0.05). Thus, the first null hypothesis was rejected. PVS showed the highest percentage of satisfactory surface detail regardless of the hemostatic agent used in this study. PVSE showed a reduced percentage of satisfactory surface detail when the concentration of aluminum chloride was high. The three hemostatic agents affected the dimensional stability of each material differently ( < 0.05). Therefore, the second null hypothesis was also rejected.
本研究旨在评估基于氯化铝的止血剂对表面细节再现和尺寸稳定性的影响。在用三种不同浓度氯化铝的市售收敛剂污染后,对三种印模材料进行了研究。三种印模材料的样本是用符合美国牙科协会第19号规范的不锈钢模具制作的。该模具预先用三种止血剂——racestyptine、Dryz和Expasyl™——进行污染,然后从每种印模材料——聚硅氧烷(PVS)、聚醚和聚硅氧烷醚(PVSE)——制作80个样本,并使其接触每种收敛剂。使用体视显微镜在4倍放大倍数下检查表面细节再现情况,并在24小时后用测量显微镜分析尺寸稳定性。表面细节数据采用Fisher检验进行统计学分析,显著性水平为0.05。尺寸稳定性数据采用双向方差分析和Tukey检验进行分析,显著性水平为0.05。氯化铝止血剂会对印模材料的表面细节再现产生不同影响(<0.05)。因此,第一个原假设被拒绝。无论本研究中使用何种止血剂,PVS的表面细节满意度百分比最高。当氯化铝浓度较高时,PVSE的表面细节满意度百分比降低。三种止血剂对每种材料的尺寸稳定性影响不同(<0.05)。因此,第二个原假设也被拒绝。