Vet Professionals, Geoghegans, 6 Colme Street, Edinburgh, EH3 6AD, UK.
Ceva Animal Health, Unit 3, Anglo Office Park, White Lion Road, Amersham, UK.
J Feline Med Surg. 2023 Aug;25(8):1098612X231183244. doi: 10.1177/1098612X231183244.
A questionnaire was designed to survey veterinarians and veterinary nurses/technicians on blood pressure (BP) assessment in cats, including ocular examination, encompassing current methodology, indications, uptake and barriers.
An online questionnaire was produced and promoted to more than 2000 veterinary professionals, of whom 545 answered all questions and 85 answered most questions.
Of the participants, 572 (90.8%) were based in the UK and almost all (n = 613, 97.3%) had access to a BP monitor. Of those that had a monitor, most (n = 550, 88.4%) participants had access to a Doppler monitor; 367 (59.0%) participants had access to multiparameter monitors; fewer (n = 202, 32.5%) had access to oscillometric BP monitors. Where applicable, Doppler monitors were most commonly chosen for conscious cat measurements (n = 337, 72.2%) due to the greater 'trust' and 'reliability' of these compared with oscillometric machines. Conscious BP measurement typically involved two members of staff (n = 391, 62.9%). Only 156 (29.1%) participants recommended BP assessment at least several times a week in their interactions with cat owners. BP assessment was routinely recommended in cats with ocular target organ damage (n = 365, 87.7%), chronic kidney disease (n = 346, 78.6%), proteinuria (n = 255, 63.0%) and hyperthyroidism (n = 266, 60.9%). Common equipment-related barriers included 'cuff frustration' and difficulties hearing the pulse signal for Doppler users (72.2% and 71.6%, respectively), and oscillometric machines failing to give a reading at least some of the time (52.8%). Situational hypertension concerns affected many (n = 507, 92.0%), as did lack of time to do the procedure (n = 402, 73.0%). Significant owner barriers included difficulties persuading the owner to bring their cat in for BP checks (n = 475, 86.2%) and concerns over costs (n = 445, 80.8%). Most participants had access to a direct ophthalmoscope (n = 527, 96.5%); however, 399 (73.1%) reported that they struggled to interpret ocular findings.
Significant barriers exist to successful BP assessment in cats. Education and support of clinics should focus on improving confidence with equipment and eye examination.
设计了一份调查问卷,以调查兽医和兽医护士/技术员在猫的血压(BP)评估方面的情况,包括眼部检查,涵盖当前的方法、适应证、采用情况和障碍。
制作了一份在线调查问卷,并向 2000 多名兽医专业人员进行了推广,其中 545 人回答了所有问题,85 人回答了大部分问题。
在参与者中,572 人(90.8%)来自英国,几乎所有人(n=613,97.3%)都可以使用血压监测仪。在有监测仪的人中,大多数(n=550,88.4%)参与者可以使用多普勒监测仪;367 人(59.0%)参与者可以使用多参数监测仪;较少的人(n=202,32.5%)可以使用振荡式血压监测仪。在适用的情况下,由于与振荡式机器相比,多普勒机器具有更大的“信任”和“可靠性”,因此最常用于对清醒猫进行测量(n=337,72.2%)。清醒状态下的 BP 测量通常需要两名工作人员(n=391,62.9%)。只有 156 名(29.1%)参与者建议在与猫主人的互动中至少每周进行几次 BP 评估。在患有眼部靶器官损伤的猫(n=365,87.7%)、慢性肾脏病(n=346,78.6%)、蛋白尿(n=255,63.0%)和甲状腺功能亢进(n=266,60.9%)中,常规推荐进行 BP 评估。常见的设备相关障碍包括“袖带挫折”和多普勒使用者难以听到脉搏信号(分别为 72.2%和 71.6%),以及振荡式机器至少有时无法读取读数(52.8%)。许多人(n=507,92.0%)都存在体位性高血压的担忧,还有 402 人(73.0%)因缺乏时间而无法进行该操作。显著的主人障碍包括难以说服主人带猫来进行 BP 检查(n=475,86.2%)和对费用的担忧(n=445,80.8%)。大多数参与者都可以使用直接检眼镜(n=527,96.5%);然而,399 人(73.1%)报告说他们难以解读眼部发现。
猫的 BP 评估存在显著障碍。诊所的教育和支持应重点提高对设备和眼部检查的信心。