Estimating Pack-Year Eligibility for Lung Cancer Screening Using 2 Yes or No Questions.
作者信息
Rendle Katharine A, Steltz Jennifer P, Cohen Sarah, Schapira Marilyn M, Wender Richard C, Bekelman Justin E, Vachani Anil
机构信息
Department of Family Medicine & Community Health, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Penn Center for Cancer Care Innovation, Abramson Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
出版信息
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Aug 1;6(8):e2327363. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.27363.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Estimating Pack-Year Eligibility for Lung Cancer Screening Using 2 Yes or No Questions.使用两个“是”或“否”问题估计肺癌筛查的包年资格。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Aug 1;6(8):e2327363. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.27363.
2
Potential Impact of Criteria Modifications on Race and Sex Disparities in Eligibility for Lung Cancer Screening.标准修改对肺癌筛查资格中种族和性别差异的潜在影响。
J Thorac Oncol. 2023 Feb;18(2):158-168. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2022.09.220. Epub 2022 Oct 5.
3
Risk prediction models versus simplified selection criteria to determine eligibility for lung cancer screening: an analysis of German federal-wide survey and incidence data.风险预测模型与简化选择标准在确定肺癌筛查资格中的比较：基于德国联邦范围调查和发病数据的分析。
Eur J Epidemiol. 2020 Oct;35(10):899-912. doi: 10.1007/s10654-020-00657-w. Epub 2020 Jun 27.
4
Pack-Year Cigarette Smoking History for Determination of Lung Cancer Screening Eligibility. Comparison of the Electronic Medical Record versus a Shared Decision-making Conversation.吸烟包年数在肺癌筛查资格中的应用。电子病历与共享决策对话的比较。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2017 Aug;14(8):1320-1325. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201612-984OC.
5
Time to quit using quit time as a lung cancer screening eligibility criterion.是时候停止将戒烟时间作为肺癌筛查资格标准了。
Cancer. 2024 Jan;130(2):182-185. doi: 10.1002/cncr.34999. Epub 2023 Sep 1.
6
Estimating eligibility for lung cancer screening in an Australian cohort, including the effect of spirometry.估算澳大利亚队列中肺癌筛查的适宜性，包括肺量测定法的影响。
Med J Aust. 2016 Jun 20;204(11):406. doi: 10.5694/mja16.00043.
7
Optimising eligibility criteria for lung cancer screening.优化肺癌筛查的入选标准。
Lancet Respir Med. 2023 Aug;11(8):665-666. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(23)00083-8. Epub 2023 Apr 5.
8
How the Expansion of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Lung Cancer Screening Eligibility May Improve Health Equity Among Diverse Sexual and Gender Minority Populations.美国预防服务工作组扩大肺癌筛查资格范围可能会如何改善不同性别和性少数群体的健康公平性。
LGBT Health. 2021 Nov;8(8):503-506. doi: 10.1089/lgbt.2021.0188. Epub 2021 Oct 6.
9
Prediction of Lung Cancer Screening Eligibility Using Simplified Criteria.简化标准预测肺癌筛查资格。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2019 Oct;16(10):1280-1285. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201903-239OC.
10
Ethical implications of changing the eligibility criteria for the proposed National Lung Cancer Screening Program.改变拟议的国家肺癌筛查计划资格标准的伦理意义。
Med J Aust. 2023 Aug 21;219(4):187. doi: 10.5694/mja2.52040. Epub 2023 Jul 30.
引用本文的文献
1
A Novel Automated Algorithm to Identify Lung Cancer Screening from Free Text of Radiology Orders.一种从放射学检查申请的自由文本中识别肺癌筛查的新型自动化算法。
J Gen Intern Med. 2025 May;40(6):1306-1314. doi: 10.1007/s11606-025-09429-2. Epub 2025 Feb 25.
2
University of Pennsylvania Telehealth Research Center of Excellence.宾夕法尼亚大学远程医疗卓越研究中心。
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2024 Jun 26;2024(64):62-69. doi: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgae011.
3
Characteristics of lung cancer screening eligible population in the US and prediction of the eligibility with simplified criteria.美国肺癌筛查 eligible 人群的特征及简化标准对 eligibility 的预测
Transl Cancer Res. 2024 May 31;13(5):2155-2163. doi: 10.21037/tcr-23-1942. Epub 2024 May 20.
4
Efficacy of Digital Outreach Strategies for Collecting Smoking Data: Pragmatic Randomized Trial.数字外展策略收集吸烟数据的效果：实用随机试验
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Feb 9;8:e50465. doi: 10.2196/50465.
本文引用的文献
1
Inaccuracies in electronic health records smoking data and a potential approach to address resulting underestimation in determining lung cancer screening eligibility.电子健康记录中吸烟数据的不准确性及解决由此导致的肺癌筛查资格确定中低估问题的潜在方法。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2022 Apr 13;29(5):779-788. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocac020.
2
Lung cancer mortality reduction by LDCT screening: UKLS randomised trial results and international meta-analysis.低剂量CT筛查降低肺癌死亡率：英国肺癌筛查试验随机试验结果及国际荟萃分析
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2021 Sep 11;10:100179. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2021.100179. eCollection 2021 Nov.
3
Patterns and Factors Associated With Adherence to Lung Cancer Screening in Diverse Practice Settings.不同实践环境中与肺癌筛查依从性相关的模式和因素。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Apr 1;4(4):e218559. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.8559.
4
State Variation in Low-Dose Computed Tomography Scanning for Lung Cancer Screening in the United States.美国肺癌筛查中低剂量计算机断层扫描的州际差异。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2021 Aug 2;113(8):1044-1052. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djaa170.
5
Prediction of Lung Cancer Screening Eligibility Using Simplified Criteria.简化标准预测肺癌筛查资格。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2019 Oct;16(10):1280-1285. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201903-239OC.
Zotero 插件