WHO Collaborating Centre for Infectious Disease Epidemiology and Control, School of Public Health, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China; Takemi Program in International Health, Harvard T H Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA; Laboratory of Data Discovery for Health, Hong Kong Science and Technology Park, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China.
WHO Collaborating Centre for Infectious Disease Epidemiology and Control, School of Public Health, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China.
Lancet Microbe. 2023 Sep;4(9):e670-e682. doi: 10.1016/S2666-5247(23)00216-1. Epub 2023 Aug 4.
Few trials have compared homologous and heterologous third doses of COVID-19 vaccination with inactivated vaccines and mRNA vaccines. The aim of this study was to assess immune responses, safety, and efficacy against SARS-CoV-2 infection following homologous or heterologous third-dose COVID-19 vaccination with either one dose of CoronaVac (Sinovac Biotech; inactivated vaccine) or BNT162b2 (Fosun Pharma-BioNTech; mRNA vaccine).
This is an ongoing, randomised, allocation-concealed, open-label, comparator-controlled trial in adults aged 18 years or older enrolled from the community in Hong Kong, who had received two doses of CoronaVac or BNT162b2 at least 6 months earlier. Participants were randomly assigned, using a computer-generated sequence, in a 1:1 ratio with allocation concealment to receive a (third) dose of CoronaVac or BNT162b2 (ancestral virus strain), stratified by types of previous COVID-19 vaccination (homologous two doses of CoronaVac or BNT162b2). Participants were unmasked to group allocation after vaccination. The primary endpoint was serum neutralising antibodies against the ancestral virus at day 28 after vaccination in each group, measured as plaque reduction neutralisation test (PRNT) geometric mean titre (GMT). Surrogate virus neutralisation test (sVNT) mean inhibition percentage and PRNT titres against omicron BA.1 and BA.2 subvariants were also measured. Secondary endpoints included geometric mean fold rise (GMFR) in antibody titres; incidence of solicited local and systemic adverse events; IFNγ CD4 and IFNγ CD8 T-cell responses at days 7 and 28; and incidence of COVID-19. Within-group comparisons of boost in immunogenicity from baseline and between-group comparisons were done according to intervention received (ie, per protocol) by paired and unpaired t test, respectively, and cumulative incidence of infection was compared using Kaplan-Meier curves and a proportional hazards model to estimate hazard ratio. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05057169.
We enrolled participants from Nov 12, 2021, to Jan 27, 2022. We vaccinated 219 participants who previously received two doses of CoronaVac, including 101 randomly assigned to receive CoronaVac (CC-C) and 118 randomly assigned to receive BNT162b2 (CC-B) as their third dose; and 232 participants who previously received two doses of BNT162b2, including 118 randomly assigned to receive CoronaVac (BB-C) and 114 randomly assigned to receive BNT162b2 (BB-B) as their third dose. The PRNT GMTs on day 28 against ancestral virus were 109, 905, 92, and 816; against omicron BA.1 were 9, 75, 8, and 86; and against omicron BA.2 were 6, 80, 6, and 67 in the CC-C, CC-B, BB-C, and BB-B groups, respectively. Mean sVNT inhibition percentages on day 28 against ancestral virus were 83%, 96%, 87%, and 96%; against omicron BA.1 were 15%, 58%, 19%, and 69%; and against omicron BA.2 were 43%, 85%, 50%, and 90%, in the CC-C, CC-B, BB-C, and BB-B groups, respectively. Participants who had previously received two doses of CoronaVac and a BNT162b2 third dose had a GMFR of 12 (p<0·0001) compared with those who received a CoronaVac third dose; similarly, those who had received two doses of BNT162b2 and a BNT162b2 third dose had a GMFR of 8 (p<0·0001). No differences in CD4 and CD8 T-cell responses were observed between groups. We did not identify any vaccination-related hospitalisation within 1 month after vaccination. We identified 58 infections when omicron BA.2 was predominantly circulating, with cumulative incidence of 15·3% and 15·4% in the CC-C and CC-B groups, respectively (p=0·93), and 16·7% and 14·0% in the BB-C and BB-B groups, respectively (p=0·56).
Similar levels of incidence of, presumably, omicron BA.2 infections were observed in each group despite very weak antibody responses to BA.2 in the recipients of a CoronaVac third dose. Further research is warranted to identify appropriate correlates of protection for inactivated COVID-19 vaccines.
Health and Medical Research Fund, Hong Kong.
For the Chinese translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.
鲜有试验比较过同源和异源第三剂 COVID-19 灭活疫苗和 mRNA 疫苗接种,本研究旨在评估既往接种过两剂科兴疫苗(Sinovac Biotech;灭活疫苗)或辉瑞疫苗(Fosun Pharma-BioNTech;mRNA 疫苗)的成年人接受同源或异源第三剂科兴或辉瑞疫苗接种后针对 SARS-CoV-2 感染的免疫应答、安全性和有效性。
这是一项正在进行的、随机、分配隐藏、开放性、对照临床试验,在香港社区招募了年龄在 18 岁及以上的成年人,他们在至少 6 个月前接种了两剂科兴或辉瑞疫苗。使用计算机生成的序列以 1:1 的比例随机分配,按照既往 COVID-19 疫苗接种类型(同源两剂科兴或辉瑞)进行分层,接受科兴或辉瑞第三剂(原始病毒株)接种。接种后,参与者对分组情况保持盲态。主要终点是每组接种后第 28 天针对原始病毒的血清中和抗体滴度,用蚀斑减少中和试验(PRNT)几何平均滴度(GMT)测量。还测量了针对 omicron BA.1 和 BA.2 亚变种的替代病毒中和试验(sVNT)平均抑制百分比和 PRNT 滴度。次要终点包括抗体滴度的几何平均倍数升高(GMFR);不良事件的发生率;接种后第 7 天和第 28 天的 IFNγ CD4 和 IFNγ CD8 T 细胞反应;以及 COVID-19 的发生。根据接受的干预措施(即按方案)进行了组内免疫原性增强的比较,采用配对和非配对 t 检验分别进行比较,采用 Kaplan-Meier 曲线和比例风险模型比较感染的累积发生率,以估计风险比。该试验在 ClinicalTrials.gov 上注册,编号为 NCT05057169。
我们于 2021 年 11 月 12 日至 2022 年 1 月 27 日入组参与者。我们给 219 名先前接种过两剂科兴疫苗的参与者接种疫苗,包括 101 名随机分配接受科兴疫苗(CC-C)和 118 名随机分配接受辉瑞疫苗(CC-B)作为第三剂;给 232 名先前接种过两剂辉瑞疫苗的参与者接种疫苗,包括 118 名随机分配接受科兴疫苗(BB-C)和 114 名随机分配接受辉瑞疫苗(BB-B)作为第三剂。第 28 天针对原始病毒的 PRNT GMT 分别为 109、905、92 和 816;针对 omicron BA.1 的 PRNT GMT 分别为 9、75、8 和 86;针对 omicron BA.2 的 PRNT GMT 分别为 6、80、6 和 67,CC-C、CC-B、BB-C 和 BB-B 组分别为 6、80、6 和 67。第 28 天针对原始病毒的 sVNT 平均抑制百分比分别为 83%、96%、87%和 96%;针对 omicron BA.1 的 sVNT 平均抑制百分比分别为 15%、58%、19%和 69%;针对 omicron BA.2 的 sVNT 平均抑制百分比分别为 43%、85%、50%和 90%,CC-C、CC-B、BB-C 和 BB-B 组分别为 43%、85%、50%和 90%。既往接种过两剂科兴疫苗和一剂辉瑞疫苗第三剂的参与者与接种科兴疫苗第三剂的参与者相比,GMFR 为 12(p<0·0001);同样,既往接种过两剂辉瑞疫苗和一剂辉瑞疫苗第三剂的参与者与接种辉瑞疫苗第三剂的参与者相比,GMFR 为 8(p<0·0001)。各组之间的 CD4 和 CD8 T 细胞反应没有差异。我们没有发现接种后 1 个月内与接种相关的住院病例。当 omicron BA.2 广泛传播时,我们发现了 58 例感染,CC-C 和 CC-B 组的累积发病率分别为 15.3%和 15.4%(p=0·93),BB-C 和 BB-B 组的累积发病率分别为 16.7%和 14.0%(p=0·56)。
尽管接种科兴疫苗第三剂后针对 BA.2 的抗体应答非常弱,但在每个组中都观察到了假定的 omicron BA.2 感染的发病率非常相似。需要进一步研究以确定 COVID-19 灭活疫苗的适当保护相关因素。
香港卫生和医学研究基金。