BioBD Lab - Informatics Department, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro (PUC-Rio), Brazil.
Education Department - Oswaldo Cruz Institute, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation and Carlos Chagas Filho Foundation for Research Support of Rio de Janeiro State (FAPERJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Vaccine. 2023 Sep 7;41(39):5715-5721. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.07.075. Epub 2023 Aug 6.
Despite Brazil's tradition of successful mass immunization programs, the country has been experiencing alarming declines in vaccination coverage, especially among children. That is aggravated by the growth of anti-vaccine movements and the spread of health misinformation in social media in the last decade, which have worsened during the COVID-19 outbreak. Several reports link populism and far-right politicians to anti-vaccination support worldwide, which was also the case in Brazil during president Jair Bolsonaro's administration. This project aimed to identify the circulating pro and anti-vaccine narratives in Portuguese on Twitter, during a crucial decision-making period regarding childhood vaccination in Brazil, from December 9, 2021, until February 9, 2022. From the over one million tweets and four million retweets collected, we identified two well-defined groups, one in favor and another against vaccination. Within the sample, we selected 1500 influencer tweets with the highest impact (>500 retweets) and conducted content analysis. Although the pro-vaccine influencers were more retweeted than anti-vaxxer ones, we observed that anti-vaccine movements were more succesful in framing discussions on Twitter. The subject of COVID-19 was the target of political polarization embedded in populist, anti-science and anti-traditional media discourses promoted by anti-vaxxers. As a counterpart, the pro-vaccine influencers reacted inarticulately, focusing on criticizing the anti-vaccination actors, attitudes, and policies instead of promoting vaccines. Based on reults, we claim that a well-coordinated network of health communicators from science centers and health institutions, in partnership with properly briefed social media influencers and fact-checking sources, would more efectively pre-tempt the public about vaccine misinformation.
尽管巴西在大规模免疫计划方面有着成功的传统,但该国的疫苗接种率却一直在令人担忧地下降,尤其是在儿童中。这一情况因反疫苗运动的发展以及过去十年社交媒体中健康错误信息的传播而加剧,在 COVID-19 爆发期间情况进一步恶化。有几份报告将民粹主义和极右翼政治家与全球范围内的反疫苗支持联系起来,这也是巴西总统贾伊尔·博索纳罗(Jair Bolsonaro)执政期间的情况。该项目旨在确定在巴西儿童疫苗接种的关键决策期间,即 2021 年 12 月 9 日至 2022 年 2 月 9 日期间,在葡萄牙语的 Twitter 上流传的赞成和反对疫苗接种的叙述。从收集到的超过 100 万条推文和 4000 万次转发中,我们确定了两个明确的群体,一个支持接种疫苗,另一个反对接种疫苗。在样本中,我们选择了 1500 条具有最高影响力(超过 500 次转发)的影响者推文,并进行了内容分析。尽管赞成疫苗接种的影响者比反疫苗接种者的转发量更多,但我们发现反疫苗运动在 Twitter 上成功地框定了讨论。COVID-19 是反疫苗接种者推广的民粹主义、反科学和反传统媒体话语中政治两极化的目标。作为回应,赞成疫苗接种的影响者反应不明确,重点批评反疫苗接种者的行为、态度和政策,而不是推广疫苗。根据结果,我们声称,一个由科学中心和医疗机构的卫生传播者组成的协调网络,与经过适当培训的社交媒体影响者和事实核查来源合作,将更有效地预先防范公众对疫苗错误信息的关注。