Suppr超能文献

伊维菌素、氯喹/羟氯喹及阿奇霉素治疗新冠肺炎的疗效:III期临床试验的系统评价

Efficacy of Ivermectin, Chloroquine/Hydroxychloroquine, and Azithromycin in Managing COVID-19: A Systematic Review of Phase III Clinical Trials.

作者信息

Sansone Nathália Mariana Santos, Boschiero Matheus Negri, Marson Fernando Augusto Lima

机构信息

Laboratory of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Laboratory of Clinical and Molecular Microbiology, LunGuardian Research Group-Epidemiology of Respiratory and Infectious Diseases, São Francisco University, Bragança Paulista 12916-900, SP, Brazil.

São Paulo Hospital, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo 04023-062, SP, Brazil.

出版信息

Biomedicines. 2024 Sep 27;12(10):2206. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines12102206.

Abstract

During the coronavirus disease (COVID)-19 pandemic several drugs were used to manage the patients mainly those with a severe phenotype. Potential drugs were used off-label and major concerns arose from their applicability to managing the health crisis highlighting the importance of clinical trials. In this context, we described the mechanisms of the three repurposed drugs [Ivermectin-antiparasitic drug, Chloroquine/Hydroxychloroquine-antimalarial drugs, and Azithromycin-antimicrobial drug]; and, based on this description, the study evaluated the clinical efficacy of those drugs published in clinical trials. The use of these drugs reflects the period of uncertainty that marked the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, which made them a possible treatment for COVID-19. In our review, we evaluated phase III randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) that analyzed the efficacy of these drugs published from the COVID-19 pandemic onset to 2023. We included eight RCTs published for Ivermectin, 11 RCTs for Chloroquine/Hydroxychloroquine, and three RCTs for Azithromycin. The research question (PICOT) accounted for P-hospitalized patients with confirmed or suspected COVID-19; I-use of oral or intravenous Ivermectin OR Chloroquine/Hydroxychloroquine OR Azithromycin; C-placebo or no placebo (standard of care); O-mortality OR hospitalization OR viral clearance OR need for mechanical ventilation OR clinical improvement; and T-phase III RCTs. While studying these drugs' respective mechanisms of action, the reasons for which they were thought to be useful became apparent and are as follows: Ivermectin binds to insulin-like growth factor and prevents nuclear transportation of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), therefore preventing cell entrance, induces apoptosis, and osmotic cell death and disrupts viral replication. Chloroquine/Hydroxychloroquine blocks the movement of SARS-CoV-2 from early endosomes to lysosomes inside the cell, also, this drug blocks the binding between SARS-CoV-2 and Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme (ACE)-2 inhibiting the interaction between the virus spike proteins and the cell membrane and this drug can also inhibit SARS-CoV-2 viral replication causing, ultimately, the reduction in viral infection as well as the potential to progression for a higher severity phenotype culminating with a higher chance of death. Azithromycin exerts a down-regulating effect on the inflammatory cascade, attenuating the excessive production of cytokines and inducing phagocytic activity, and acts interfering with the viral replication cycle. Ivermectin, when compared to standard care or placebo, did not reduce the disease severity, need for mechanical ventilation, need for intensive care unit, or in-hospital mortality. Only one study demonstrated that Ivermectin may improve viral clearance compared to placebo. Individuals who received Chloroquine/Hydroxychloroquine did not present a lower incidence of death, improved clinical status, or higher chance of respiratory deterioration compared to those who received usual care or placebo. Also, some studies demonstrated that Chloroquine/Hydroxychloroquine resulted in worse outcomes and side-effects included severe ones. Adding Azithromycin to a standard of care did not result in clinical improvement in hospitalized COVID-19 participants. In brief, COVID-19 was one of the deadliest pandemics in modern human history. Due to the potential health catastrophe caused by SARS-CoV-2, a global effort was made to evaluate treatments for COVID-19 to attenuate its impact on the human species. Unfortunately, several countries prematurely justified the emergency use of drugs that showed only in vitro effects against SARS-CoV-2, with a dearth of evidence supporting efficacy in humans. In this context, we reviewed the mechanisms of several drugs proposed to treat COVID-19, including Ivermectin, Chloroquine/Hydroxychloroquine, and Azithromycin, as well as the phase III clinical trials that evaluated the efficacy of these drugs for treating patients with this respiratory disease. As the main finding, although Ivermectin, Chloroquine/Hydroxychloroquine, and Azithromycin might have mechanistic effects against SARS-CoV-2 infection, most phase III clinical trials observed no treatment benefit in patients with COVID-19, underscoring the need for robust phase III clinical trials.

摘要

在冠状病毒病(COVID)-19大流行期间,几种药物被用于治疗患者,主要是那些具有严重症状的患者。潜在药物被超说明书使用,人们对其在应对健康危机中的适用性产生了重大担忧,这凸显了临床试验的重要性。在此背景下,我们描述了三种重新利用的药物[伊维菌素——抗寄生虫药物、氯喹/羟氯喹——抗疟疾药物、阿奇霉素——抗菌药物]的作用机制;基于此描述,本研究评估了这些药物在已发表的临床试验中的临床疗效。这些药物的使用反映了COVID-19大流行初期的不确定性时期,这使得它们成为COVID-19的一种可能治疗方法。在我们的综述中,我们评估了从COVID-19大流行开始至2023年期间发表的分析这些药物疗效的III期随机对照临床试验(RCT)。我们纳入了8项关于伊维菌素的RCT、11项关于氯喹/羟氯喹的RCT和3项关于阿奇霉素的RCT。研究问题(PICOT)包括:P——确诊或疑似COVID-19的住院患者;I——口服或静脉使用伊维菌素或氯喹/羟氯喹或阿奇霉素;C——安慰剂或无安慰剂(标准治疗);O——死亡率或住院率或病毒清除率或机械通气需求或临床改善;T——III期RCT。在研究这些药物各自的作用机制时,它们被认为有用的原因变得显而易见,如下所述:伊维菌素与胰岛素样生长因子结合,阻止严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)的核转运,从而防止病毒进入细胞,诱导细胞凋亡和渗透性细胞死亡,并破坏病毒复制。氯喹/羟氯喹阻止SARS-CoV-2从早期内体向细胞内溶酶体的移动,此外,该药物还阻止SARS-CoV-2与血管紧张素转换酶(ACE)-2的结合,抑制病毒刺突蛋白与细胞膜之间的相互作用,并且该药物还可以抑制SARS-CoV-2病毒复制,最终导致病毒感染减少以及发展为更高严重程度症状的可能性降低,最终死亡几率更高。阿奇霉素对炎症级联反应具有下调作用,减弱细胞因子的过度产生并诱导吞噬活性,并干扰病毒复制周期。与标准治疗或安慰剂相比,伊维菌素并未降低疾病严重程度、机械通气需求、重症监护病房需求或住院死亡率。只有一项研究表明,与安慰剂相比,伊维菌素可能改善病毒清除率。与接受常规治疗或安慰剂的患者相比,接受氯喹/羟氯喹的患者并未表现出更低的死亡率、改善的临床状态或更高的呼吸恶化几率。此外,一些研究表明,氯喹/羟氯喹导致了更差的结果,且副作用包括严重副作用。在标准治疗中添加阿奇霉素并未使COVID-19住院参与者的临床状况得到改善。简而言之,COVID-19是现代人类历史上最致命的大流行之一。由于SARS-CoV-2可能造成的健康灾难,全球努力评估COVID-19的治疗方法以减轻其对人类的影响。不幸的是,几个国家过早地为仅在体外对SARS-CoV-2有作用的药物的紧急使用进行了辩护,而缺乏支持其对人类有效力的证据。在此背景下,我们综述了几种提议用于治疗COVID-19的药物的作用机制,包括伊维菌素、氯喹/羟氯喹和阿奇霉素,以及评估这些药物治疗这种呼吸道疾病患者疗效的III期临床试验。作为主要发现,尽管伊维菌素、氯喹/羟氯喹和阿奇霉素可能对SARS-CoV-2感染具有机制性作用,但大多数III期临床试验未观察到对COVID-19患者的治疗益处,这突出了进行强有力的III期临床试验的必要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6111/11505156/6c122073c4c3/biomedicines-12-02206-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验