Segmentation-Based Analysis of T2- and T1-Weighted Dynamic Magnetic Resonance Images Provides Adequate Observer Agreement in the Evaluation of Interstitial Lung Disease.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study is to quantify observer agreement in the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) classification of inflammatory or fibrotic interstitial lung disease (ILD).

METHODS

Our study is a preliminary analysis of a larger prospective cohort. The MRI images of 18 patients with ILD (13 females; mean age, 65 years) were acquired in a 1.5 T scanner and included axial fat-saturated T2-weighted (T2-WI, n = 18) and coronal fat-saturated T1-weighted images before and 1, 3, 5, and 10 minutes after gadolinium administration (n = 16). The MRI studies were evaluated with 2 different methods: a qualitative evaluation (visual assessment and measurement of few regions of interest; evaluations were performed independently by 5 radiologists and 3 times by 1 radiologist) and a segmentation-based analysis with software extraction of signal intensity values (evaluations were performed independently by 2 radiologists and twice by 1 radiologist). Interstitial lung disease was classified as inflammatory or fibrotic, based on previously described imaging criteria.

RESULTS

Regarding the qualitative evaluation, intraobserver agreement was excellent (κ = 0.92, P < 0.05) for T2-WI and fair (κ = 0.29, P < 0.05) for T1 dynamic study, while interobserver agreement was moderate (κ = 0.56, P < 0.05) and poor (κ = 0.11, P = 0.18), respectively. In contrast, upon segmentation-based analysis, intraobserver and interobserver agreement were excellent for T2-WI (κ = 0.886, P < 0.001; κ = 1.00, P < 0.001; respectively); for T1-WI, intraobserver agreement was excellent (κ = 0.87, P < 0.05) and interobserver agreement was good (κ = 0.75, P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Segmentation-based MRI analysis is more reproducible than a qualitative evaluation with visual assessment and measurement of few regions of interest.