van Walbeek Corné, Hill Robert, Filby Samantha
Research Unit on the Economics of Excisable Products, School of Economics, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch, South Africa.
Development Policy Research Unit, School of Economics, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch, South Africa.
Tob Induc Dis. 2023 Aug 7;21:102. doi: 10.18332/tid/168594. eCollection 2023.
In response to COVID-19, the South African government banned the sale of tobacco products for 20 weeks. Before the ban, the illicit cigarette market was well-entrenched and smoking cessation services were not widely available. Several surveys conducted to ascertain cigarette smokers' responses to the ban reported substantial differences in the proportion of smokers who quit. This study provides a broadly nationally representative ex-post investigation into cigarette smokers' quitting behavior related to the sales ban.
We used data from wave three of NIDS-CRAM (the National Income Dynamics Study-Coronavirus Rapid Mobile Survey) conducted in November-December 2020. We first investigated the proportion of people who quit and who continued smoking during and after the sales ban. We subsequently linked the NIDS-CRAM survey to the fifth wave of NIDS (2017) to identify a subset of established smokers, and considered whether their quitting behavior differed from that of all smokers who smoked at the start of the sales ban.
The cross-sectional analysis showed that 7.8% of cigarette smokers quit during the sales ban, but that 55% of these quitters relapsed after it was lifted. Of the pre-ban smokers, 3.5% indicated that they did not smoke both during and after the sales ban, and 3.7% quit after the ban was lifted. The longitudinal analysis showed that 7% of people who were smoking in 2017, quit smoking cigarettes during the tobacco sales ban, but that >70% of quitters relapsed after it was lifted. Only 2% of pre-ban established smokers indicated that they did not smoke during or after the ban.
The sales ban did not have the intended objective of encouraging large-scale smoking cessation. This reflects policy failures to provide smokers with appropriate cessation support and to effectively control the illicit market both prior to and during the sales ban.
为应对新冠疫情,南非政府禁止销售烟草产品达20周。在禁令实施前,非法卷烟市场已根深蒂固,戒烟服务也未广泛普及。为确定吸烟者对该禁令的反应而进行的多项调查显示,戒烟吸烟者的比例存在显著差异。本研究对吸烟者与销售禁令相关的戒烟行为进行了一项具有广泛全国代表性的事后调查。
我们使用了2020年11月至12月进行的NIDS-CRAM(国民收入动态研究-冠状病毒快速移动调查)第三轮数据。我们首先调查了在销售禁令期间及之后戒烟和继续吸烟的人群比例。随后,我们将NIDS-CRAM调查与NIDS(2017年)的第五轮调查相联系,以确定一组既定吸烟者,并考虑他们的戒烟行为是否与销售禁令开始时所有吸烟者的行为不同。
横断面分析表明,7.8%的吸烟者在销售禁令期间戒烟,但其中55%的戒烟者在禁令解除后复吸。在禁令实施前的吸烟者中,3.5%表示在销售禁令期间及之后都不吸烟,3.7%在禁令解除后戒烟。纵向分析表明,2017年吸烟的人群中有7%在烟草销售禁令期间戒烟,但超过70%的戒烟者在禁令解除后复吸。只有2%的禁令实施前的既定吸烟者表示在禁令期间或之后不吸烟。
销售禁令并未达到鼓励大规模戒烟的预期目标。这反映出政策未能在销售禁令之前及期间为吸烟者提供适当的戒烟支持,也未能有效控制非法市场。