Moran Lynnelle, Foster Kim, Bayes Sara
Australian Catholic University, Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia.
Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Western Australia, Australia.
Birth. 2023 Dec;50(4):672-688. doi: 10.1111/birt.12756. Epub 2023 Aug 8.
Internationally, the midwifery workforce is facing a professional crisis due to numerous organizational and individual factors that have led to midwives leaving the profession. These factors include high levels of workplace stress, systemic barriers to providing woman and person-centered care, trauma, and burnout. The COVID-19 pandemic magnified these pre-existing stressors and adversities and has further disrupted midwives' ability to practice within their professional norms. In order to understand how midwives can be better supported, there is a need to understand what contributes to and detracts from their well-being and resilience.
To investigate and synthesize the extant international knowledge on midwives' well-being and resilience in the context of workplace stress and adversity.
Integrative review of the literature published in peer-reviewed journals.
Thematic analysis of the literature resulted in three core themes: (1) risk factors and adversity; (2) protective factors and resilience; and (3) sustaining factors and well-being in midwifery. Findings from this integrated review highlight that several factors associated with workplace adversity can also be sources of protection depending on their presence or absence. Within the included studies, there exists a broad use of concepts and definitions that are applied to well-being and resilience, resulting in a lack of uniformity and cohesion.
In this review, we identified a high level of workplace adversity and the subsequent impacts on midwives' well-being and resilience. A series of protective factors and strategies that can be used to improve the well-being of midwives and support resilience within the profession were also identified; however, further research of the population is required. In addition, the development of cohesive well-being and resilience concepts specific to midwifery is recommended, as is the development and application of uniform terminologies and definitions.
在国际上,由于众多组织和个人因素导致助产士离开该行业,助产士劳动力正面临专业危机。这些因素包括高水平的工作场所压力、提供以妇女和个人为中心的护理的系统性障碍、创伤和职业倦怠。新冠疫情加剧了这些先前存在的压力源和困境,进一步扰乱了助产士在其专业规范内执业的能力。为了了解如何能更好地支持助产士,有必要了解是什么促进和减损了他们的幸福感和恢复力。
调查并综合现有的关于工作场所压力和困境背景下助产士幸福感和恢复力的国际知识。
对同行评审期刊上发表的文献进行综合综述。
对文献的主题分析产生了三个核心主题:(1)风险因素和困境;(2)保护因素和恢复力;(3)助产工作中的维持因素和幸福感。这项综合综述的结果表明,与工作场所困境相关的几个因素,根据其存在与否,也可能成为保护的来源。在所纳入的研究中,广泛使用了应用于幸福感和恢复力的概念和定义,导致缺乏统一性和连贯性。
在本综述中,我们确定了高水平的工作场所困境以及对助产士幸福感和恢复力的后续影响。还确定了一系列可用于改善助产士幸福感并支持该行业恢复力的保护因素和策略;然而,需要对这一人群进行进一步研究。此外,建议制定专门针对助产工作的连贯的幸福感和恢复力概念,以及统一术语和定义的制定与应用。