Suppr超能文献

比较 Monte Carlo 和射线追踪剂量计算算法在 CyberKnife 上对多个脑靶区治疗的准确性。

Comparison of the accuracy of Monte Carlo and Ray Tracing dose calculation algorithms for multiple target brain treatments on CyberKnife.

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Hospital Ave, Nedlands, WA, Australia.

School of Physics, Mathematics and Computing, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia.

出版信息

Phys Eng Sci Med. 2023 Dec;46(4):1477-1487. doi: 10.1007/s13246-023-01312-w. Epub 2023 Aug 8.

Abstract

Single plan multiple brain targets (MBT) stereotactic radiosurgery dose difference between Monte Carlo (MC) and Ray Tracing (RT) algorithms has not been studied. A retrospective study and dose measurements were performed to access factors influencing dose differences. Fifty-three RT treatment plans with a total of 209 brain metastases were extracted from Precision Treatment Planning System (TPS). These plans were generated using fixed cones and were delivered using the CyberKnife M6 system. The same treatment plans were recalculated using MC algorithm and keeping the beam parameters unchanged. MC calculated plan parameters were extracted and dose differences were normalised to MC calculated dose. Correlations were investigated. RT and MC calculated off-centre-ratio (OCR) and tissue-phantom-ratio (TPRs) were exported from the TPS and compared with measured. Plans with 5 gross tumour volumes (GTVs) were created on a phantom and dose measured using a CC04 ionisation chamber and microdiamond detector for comparison with calculated doses. Calculated and measured TPR agreed within ± 1% beyond depth of maximum dose. The OCR showed differences up to 4.3% in the penumbra and out-of-field (OOF) regions. Largest RT and MC calculated GTV mean dose difference was - 5.7%. An increase in the number of GTVs and reduction in the geometric separation of metastases were associated with increased differences between RT and MC calculated doses. In conclusion, calculated dose disagreement in MBT depends on the number of GTVs per plan, number of GTVs within a certain separation distance and plan complexity. MC dose calculation is recommended for complex CyberKnife SRS of MBT.

摘要

单计划多脑靶(MBT)立体定向放射外科中蒙特卡罗(MC)和射线追踪(RT)算法之间的剂量差异尚未得到研究。本研究回顾性地进行了剂量测量,以评估影响剂量差异的因素。从精确治疗计划系统(TPS)中提取了 53 个 RT 治疗计划,共计 209 个脑转移瘤。这些计划使用固定的锥形束生成,并使用 CyberKnife M6 系统进行治疗。使用 MC 算法重新计算了相同的治疗计划,同时保持光束参数不变。提取了 MC 计算的计划参数,并将剂量差异归一化为 MC 计算的剂量。进行了相关性研究。从 TPS 中导出了 RT 和 MC 计算的离轴比(OCR)和组织-体模比(TPR),并与实测值进行了比较。在体模上创建了 5 个大体肿瘤体积(GTV)的计划,并使用 CC04 电离室和微金刚石探测器进行剂量测量,以与计算剂量进行比较。计算和测量的 TPR 在最大剂量深度以外的误差在 1%以内。OCR 在半影和场外(OOF)区域显示出高达 4.3%的差异。RT 和 MC 计算的 GTV 平均剂量差异最大为-5.7%。GTV 数量的增加和转移瘤之间几何分离的减少与 RT 和 MC 计算剂量之间差异的增加有关。总之,MBT 中的计算剂量差异取决于每个计划的 GTV 数量、一定分离距离内的 GTV 数量和计划的复杂性。对于 MBT 的复杂 CyberKnife SRS,推荐使用 MC 剂量计算。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验