Suppr超能文献

用于估算灾难性卫生支出的主要方法概述。

Overview of the main methods used for estimating catastrophic health expenditure.

作者信息

Nguyen Huyen Anh, Ahmed Sayem, Turner Hugo C

机构信息

Oxford University Clinical Research Unit, Centre for Tropical Medicine, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.

Health Economics and Health Technology Assessment, School of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.

出版信息

Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2023 Aug 8;21(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s12962-023-00457-5.

Abstract

Out-of-pocket payments are expenditures borne directly by an individual/household for health services that are not reimbursed by any third-party. Households can experience financial hardship when the burden of such out-of-pocket payments is significant. This financial hardship is commonly measured using the "catastrophic health expenditure" (CHE) metric. CHE has been applied as an indicator in several health sectors and health policies. However, despite its importance, the methods used to measure the incidence of CHE vary across different studies and the terminology used can be inconsistent. In this paper, we introduce and raise awareness of the main approaches used to calculate CHE and discuss critical areas of methodological variation in a global health context. We outline the key features, foundation and differences between the two main methods used for estimating CHE: the budget share and the capacity-to-pay approach. We discuss key sources of variation within CHE calculation and using data from Ethiopia as a case study, illustrate how different approaches can lead to notably different CHE estimates. This variation could lead to challenges when decisionmakers and policymakers need to compare different studies' CHE estimates. This overview is intended to better understand how to interpret and compare CHE estimates and the potential variation across different studies.

摘要

自付费用是指个人/家庭直接承担的、未获任何第三方报销的医疗服务支出。当这种自付费用负担过重时,家庭可能会面临经济困难。这种经济困难通常使用“灾难性卫生支出”(CHE)指标来衡量。CHE已在多个卫生领域和卫生政策中用作一项指标。然而,尽管其很重要,但不同研究中用于衡量CHE发生率的方法各不相同,且所使用的术语也可能不一致。在本文中,我们介绍并提高对用于计算CHE的主要方法的认识,并在全球卫生背景下讨论方法差异的关键领域。我们概述了用于估计CHE的两种主要方法——预算份额法和支付能力法——的关键特征、基础和差异。我们讨论了CHE计算中差异的关键来源,并以埃塞俄比亚的数据为例,说明不同方法如何导致显著不同的CHE估计值。当决策者需要比较不同研究的CHE估计值时,这种差异可能会带来挑战。本综述旨在更好地理解如何解释和比较CHE估计值以及不同研究之间潜在的差异。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

4
A Simple Measure of Catastrophic Health Expenditures.一种衡量灾难性卫生支出的简单方法。
Health Econ. 2025 Oct;34(10):1821-1831. doi: 10.1002/hec.70007. Epub 2025 Jun 25.

本文引用的文献

6
Sensitive questions in surveys.调查中的敏感问题。
Psychol Bull. 2007 Sep;133(5):859-83. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.133.5.859.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验