Division of Biomedical Science, Institute of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8575, Japan.
Graduate School of Comprehensive Human Science, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8575, Japan.
Sci Adv. 2023 Aug 9;9(32):eadh2831. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adh2831.
Individuals often assess past decisions by comparing what was gained with what would have been gained had they acted differently. Thoughts of past alternatives that counter what actually happened are called "counterfactuals." Recent theories emphasize the role of the prefrontal cortex in processing counterfactual outcomes in decision-making, although how subcortical regions contribute to this process remains to be elucidated. Here we report a clear distinction among the roles of the orbitofrontal cortex, ventral striatum and midbrain dopamine neurons in processing counterfactual outcomes in monkeys. Our findings suggest that actually gained and counterfactual outcome signals are both processed in the cortico-subcortical network constituted by these regions but in distinct manners and integrated only in the orbitofrontal cortex in a way to compare these outcomes. This study extends the prefrontal theory of counterfactual thinking and provides key insights regarding how the prefrontal cortex cooperates with subcortical regions to make decisions using counterfactual information.
个体通常通过比较实际所得与如果采取不同行动本应获得的收益来评估过去的决策。与实际发生的情况相反的过去替代方案的想法被称为“反事实”。最近的理论强调了前额叶皮层在决策中处理反事实结果的作用,尽管皮质下区域如何促进这一过程仍有待阐明。在这里,我们报告了猴子的眶额皮层、腹侧纹状体和中脑多巴胺神经元在处理反事实结果中的作用之间的明显区别。我们的发现表明,实际获得的和反事实结果的信号都在由这些区域构成的皮质下网络中进行处理,但以不同的方式进行处理,并且仅在眶额皮层中以一种方式进行整合,以比较这些结果。这项研究扩展了反事实思维的前额叶理论,并提供了关于前额叶皮层如何与皮质下区域合作使用反事实信息做出决策的关键见解。