• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

较高的主观社会经济地位与慈善捐赠的增加和与心理化相关的神经价值编码有关。

Higher subjective socioeconomic status is linked to increased charitable giving and mentalizing-related neural value coding.

机构信息

Department of Cognitive Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Human Movement Science, Universität Hamburg, Hamburg 20146, Germany; Department of Nutritional Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Vienna, Vienna 1090, Austria.

Queen's Neuroeconomics Laboratory, Departments of Psychology and Economics, Queen's University, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada.

出版信息

Neuroimage. 2023 Oct 1;279:120315. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2023.120315. Epub 2023 Aug 7.

DOI:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2023.120315
PMID:37557972
Abstract

Socioeconomic status (SES), a concept related to an individual's economic and social position relative to others, can shape social interactions like altruistic behaviors. However, little is known about the exact neurocognitive mechanisms that link SES with altruism. Our study aimed to provide a comprehensive account of the sociocognitive and neural mechanisms through which SES affects charitable giving - an important variant of human altruism. To this end, participants completed a charitable donation task while their brain activity was measured using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). We also assessed participants' socio-cognitive ability to infer other people's mental states (i.e., mentalizing) - a driver of prosocial behavior - in an independent social task. Behaviorally, we found that both charitable giving and social cognition were status-dependent, as subjective SES positively predicted donations and mentalizing capacity. Moreover, the link between SES and charitable giving was mediated by individuals' mentalizing capacity. At the neural level, a multivariate pattern analysis of fMRI data revealed that higher subjective SES was associated with stronger value coding in the right temporoparietal junction (rTPJ). The strength of this value representation predicted charitable giving and was linked to mentalizing. Furthermore, we observed an increased negative functional coupling between rTPJ and left putamen with higher SES. Together, increased charitable giving in higher-status individuals could be explained by status-dependent recruitment of mentalizing-related value coding and altered functional connectivity in the brain. Our findings provide insights into the socio- and neurocognitive mechanisms explaining why and when higher SES leads to prosociality, which might ultimately inform targeted interventions to promote prosocial behavior in human societies.

摘要

社会经济地位(SES)是一个与个体相对于他人的经济和社会地位相关的概念,它可以塑造社会互动,如利他行为。然而,人们对 SES 与利他主义相关的确切神经认知机制知之甚少。我们的研究旨在全面描述 SES 影响慈善捐赠的社会认知和神经机制,慈善捐赠是人类利他主义的一个重要变体。为此,参与者在完成慈善捐赠任务的同时,我们使用功能磁共振成像(fMRI)测量他们的大脑活动。我们还评估了参与者在独立的社会任务中推断他人心理状态(即心理化)的社会认知能力,心理化是亲社会行为的驱动因素。行为上,我们发现慈善捐赠和社会认知都是依赖于地位的,因为主观 SES 积极预测捐赠和心理化能力。此外,SES 和慈善捐赠之间的联系是通过个体的心理化能力来介导的。在神经水平上,对 fMRI 数据的多元模式分析显示,更高的主观 SES 与右颞顶联合区(rTPJ)更强的价值编码相关。这种价值表示的强度预测了慈善捐赠,并与心理化相关。此外,我们观察到随着 SES 的增加,rTPJ 和左壳核之间的负功能耦合增加。总之,高 SES 个体的慈善捐赠增加可以用依赖于地位的心理化相关价值编码的募集和大脑中功能连接的改变来解释。我们的发现为解释为什么和何时更高的 SES 导致亲社会行为提供了社会认知和神经认知机制的见解,这可能最终为人类社会中促进亲社会行为的有针对性干预提供信息。

相似文献

1
Higher subjective socioeconomic status is linked to increased charitable giving and mentalizing-related neural value coding.较高的主观社会经济地位与慈善捐赠的增加和与心理化相关的神经价值编码有关。
Neuroimage. 2023 Oct 1;279:120315. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2023.120315. Epub 2023 Aug 7.
2
Altruism under Stress: Cortisol Negatively Predicts Charitable Giving and Neural Value Representations Depending on Mentalizing Capacity.压力下的利他主义:皮质醇根据心理化能力负向预测慈善捐赠和神经价值表现。
J Neurosci. 2022 Apr 20;42(16):3445-3460. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1870-21.2022. Epub 2022 Mar 14.
3
Decoding the Charitable Brain: Empathy, Perspective Taking, and Attention Shifts Differentially Predict Altruistic Giving.解读慈善之心:同理心、换位思考与注意力转移对利他捐赠的预测作用各异。
J Neurosci. 2016 Apr 27;36(17):4719-32. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3392-15.2016.
4
Charity preferences and perceived impact moderate charitable giving and associated neural response.慈善偏好和感知影响会调节慈善捐赠行为及其相关的神经反应。
Neuropsychologia. 2021 Sep 17;160:107957. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2021.107957. Epub 2021 Jul 14.
5
The Causal Role of Temporoparietal Junction in Mediating Self-Other Mergence during Mentalizing.颞顶联合区在心理理论中介导自我-他人融合的因果作用。
J Neurosci. 2023 Dec 6;43(49):8442-8455. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1026-23.2023.
6
Does the TPJ fit it all? Representational similarity analysis of different forms of mentalizing.TPJ 是否涵盖了所有内容?不同形式心理化的代表性相似性分析。
Soc Neurosci. 2022 Oct;17(5):428-440. doi: 10.1080/17470919.2022.2138536. Epub 2022 Oct 30.
7
Multivariate pattern analysis of electroencephalography data reveals information predictive of charitable giving.多变量模式分析脑电图数据揭示了预测慈善捐赠的信息。
Neuroimage. 2021 Nov 15;242:118475. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118475. Epub 2021 Aug 14.
8
Oxytocin effects on the resting-state mentalizing brain network.催产素对静息状态心理化脑网络的影响。
Brain Imaging Behav. 2020 Dec;14(6):2530-2541. doi: 10.1007/s11682-019-00205-5.
9
Neural signatures of prosocial behaviors.亲社会行为的神经特征。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2020 Nov;118:186-195. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.07.006. Epub 2020 Jul 21.
10
Neural similarity between mentalizing and live social interaction during the transition to adolescence.青少年期过渡阶段的心理理论和真实社交互动的神经相似性。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2022 Sep;43(13):4074-4090. doi: 10.1002/hbm.25903. Epub 2022 May 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors associated with blood donation among college and university students in Wuhan, China: structural equation model.中国武汉大学生献血相关因素分析:结构方程模型。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Jul 10;24(1):1847. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19384-y.
2
Association of educational attainment with hypertension and type-2 diabetes: A Mendelian randomization study.教育程度与高血压和2型糖尿病的关联:一项孟德尔随机化研究。
SSM Popul Health. 2024 Jan 6;25:101585. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2023.101585. eCollection 2024 Mar.