National Research Centre for the Working Environment, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.
National Research Centre for the Working Environment, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark; Research Group for Risk-benefit, National Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark, Denmark.
Toxicology. 2023 Aug 15;495:153612. doi: 10.1016/j.tox.2023.153612. Epub 2023 Aug 7.
Exposure to spray-formulated products for car cabin detailing is a potential risk for asthma induction. With a focus on the asthma-related endpoints sensitisation and irritation of the lungs, we performed an occupational risk assessment based on requirements in the EU Chemical Agents Directive. We identified 71 such spray products available in Denmark. We identified ingredient substances in safety data sheets and screened for harmonised classifications of respiratory sensitisation and airway irritation. For respiratory sensitisation, we also applied quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR). We modelled the exposure during 15 min of work inside a car cabin, and determined the risk ratio of the products by further applying occupational exposure limits - mainly derived no-effect levels (DNELs) from the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) set on respiratory irritation. Four substances had a harmonised classification for respiratory irritation (bronopol, 2-phenoxyethanol, 2-methoxypropanol, and butan-1-ol). Seven substances were positive in the QSAR model for respiratory sensitisation (monoethanolamine, bronopol, glycerol, methyl salicylate, benzoic acid, ammonium benzoate, and sodium benzoate). Two vinyl treatment products had a risk ratio > 1 based on the level of sodium benzoate and its DNEL set on respiratory irritation. Two products had risk ratios of 0.69 and 0.73, respectively, based on 2-methyl-2 H-isothiazol-3-one and its acute DNEL set on respiratory irritation. In conclusion, 10 substances that may pose a risk for asthma induction were identified in the products. Two of the 71 products had a risk ratio > 1, meaning they may pose an asthma-induction risk in the modelled exposure scenario and using respiratory irritation DNELs from ECHA.
暴露于喷雾配方的汽车舱室护理产品是引发哮喘的潜在风险。我们关注与哮喘相关的终点,即肺部致敏和刺激,根据欧盟化学物质指令的要求进行了职业风险评估。我们确定了丹麦市场上有 71 种此类喷雾产品。我们在安全数据表中识别了成分物质,并对呼吸致敏和气道刺激的协调分类进行了筛选。对于呼吸致敏,我们还应用了定量构效关系(QSAR)。我们模拟了在汽车舱内工作 15 分钟期间的暴露情况,并通过进一步应用职业暴露限值(主要来自欧洲化学品管理局(ECHA)设定的呼吸道刺激无效应水平(DNEL))来确定产品的风险比。有 4 种物质具有呼吸道刺激的协调分类(溴硝醇、2-苯氧乙醇、2-甲氧基-1-丙醇和 1-丁醇)。在呼吸致敏的 QSAR 模型中,有 7 种物质呈阳性(单乙醇胺、溴硝醇、甘油、水杨酸甲酯、苯甲酸、苯甲酸钠和 2-苯甲酸钠)。两种乙烯基处理产品基于苯甲酸钠及其呼吸道刺激的 DNEL,风险比大于 1。两种产品的风险比分别为 0.69 和 0.73,基于 2-甲基-2H-异噻唑-3-酮及其呼吸道刺激的急性 DNEL。总之,在产品中识别出了 10 种可能引发哮喘的物质。在 71 种产品中,有 2 种产品的风险比大于 1,这意味着它们在模拟的暴露情况下,使用 ECHA 的呼吸道刺激 DNEL,可能会引发哮喘。