• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

呼气 CO 监测指导新生儿无创通气:系统评价。

Exhaled CO monitoring to guide non-invasive ventilation at birth: a systematic review.

机构信息

Department of Neonatology, Simpson Centre for Reproductive Health, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.

Department of Pediatrics, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA.

出版信息

Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2023 Dec 15;109(1):74-80. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2023-325698.

DOI:10.1136/archdischild-2023-325698
PMID:37558397
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Measuring exhaled carbon dioxide (ECO) during non-invasive ventilation at birth may provide information about lung aeration. However, the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR) only recommends ECO detection for confirming endotracheal tube placement. ILCOR has therefore prioritised a research question that needs to be urgently evaluated: 'In newborn infants receiving intermittent positive pressure ventilation by any non-invasive interface at birth, does the use of an ECO monitor in addition to clinical assessment, pulse oximetry and/or ECG, compared with clinical assessment, pulse oximetry and/or ECG only, decrease endotracheal intubation in the delivery room, improve response to resuscitation, improve survival or reduce morbidity?'.

DESIGN

Systematic review of randomised and non-randomised studies identified by Ovid MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane CENTRAL search until 1 August 2022.

SETTING

Delivery room.

PATIENTS

Newborn infants receiving non-invasive ventilation at birth.

INTERVENTION

ECO measurement plus routine assessment compared with routine assessment alone.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Endotracheal intubation in the delivery room, response to resuscitation, survival and morbidity.

RESULTS

Among 2370 articles, 23 were included; however, none had a relevant control group. Although studies indicated that the absence of ECO may signify airway obstruction and ECO detection may precede a heart rate increase in adequately ventilated infants, they did not directly address the research question.

CONCLUSIONS

Evidence to support the use of an ECO monitor to guide non-invasive positive pressure ventilation at birth is lacking. More research on the effectiveness of ECO measurement in addition to routine assessment during non-invasive ventilation of newborn infants at birth is needed.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42022344849.

摘要

目的

在出生时进行无创通气时测量呼出的二氧化碳(ECO)可提供有关肺充气的信息。然而,国际复苏联合会(ILCOR)仅建议使用 ECO 探测器来确认气管内插管的位置。因此,ILCOR 已将一个需要紧急评估的研究问题列为优先事项:“在出生时通过任何非侵入性界面接受间歇正压通气的新生儿中,与仅进行临床评估、脉搏血氧饱和度和/或心电图相比,在临床评估、脉搏血氧饱和度和/或心电图之外使用 ECO 监测仪是否会减少分娩室中的气管内插管、改善复苏反应、提高存活率或降低发病率?”。

设计

通过 Ovid MEDLINE、Embase 和 Cochrane CENTRAL 搜索,对截至 2022 年 8 月 1 日确定的随机和非随机研究进行系统评价。

设置

分娩室。

患者

出生时接受无创通气的新生儿。

干预措施

ECO 测量加常规评估与单独常规评估相比。

主要观察结果

分娩室中的气管内插管、复苏反应、存活率和发病率。

结果

在 2370 篇文章中,有 23 篇被纳入;然而,没有一篇有相关的对照组。尽管这些研究表明 ECO 的缺失可能表明气道阻塞,并且在充分通气的婴儿中 ECO 检测可能先于心率增加,但它们并没有直接解决研究问题。

结论

缺乏支持使用 ECO 监测仪来指导出生时无创正压通气的证据。需要对出生时对新生儿进行无创通气时,除了常规评估外,ECO 测量的有效性进行更多研究。

PROSPERO 注册号:CRD42022344849。

相似文献

1
Exhaled CO monitoring to guide non-invasive ventilation at birth: a systematic review.呼气 CO 监测指导新生儿无创通气:系统评价。
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2023 Dec 15;109(1):74-80. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2023-325698.
2
2005 American Heart Association (AHA) guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and emergency cardiovascular care (ECC) of pediatric and neonatal patients: pediatric basic life support.2005年美国心脏协会(AHA)关于儿科和新生儿患者心肺复苏(CPR)及紧急心血管护理(ECC)的指南:儿科基础生命支持
Pediatrics. 2006 May;117(5):e989-1004. doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-0219.
3
Exhaled carbon dioxide can be used to guide respiratory support in the delivery room.呼出的二氧化碳可用于指导产房内的呼吸支持。
Acta Paediatr. 2014 Aug;103(8):796-806. doi: 10.1111/apa.12650. Epub 2014 Apr 30.
4
Decrease in delivery room intubation rates after use of nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation in the delivery room for resuscitation of very low birth weight infants.使用经鼻间歇正压通气在产房复苏极低出生体重儿后,产房内插管率降低。
Resuscitation. 2017 Jul;116:33-38. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2017.05.004. Epub 2017 May 2.
5
Using exhaled CO to guide initial respiratory support at birth: a randomised controlled trial.使用呼出二氧化碳指导出生时的初始呼吸支持:一项随机对照试验。
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2017 Nov;102(6):F525-F531. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2016-312286. Epub 2017 Jun 8.
6
Sustained versus standard inflations during neonatal resuscitation to prevent mortality and improve respiratory outcomes.新生儿复苏期间持续充气与标准充气对预防死亡和改善呼吸结局的作用
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Mar 18;3(3):CD004953. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004953.pub4.
7
Expired carbon dioxide during newborn resuscitation as predictor of outcome.新生儿复苏过程中二氧化碳的呼出作为预后的预测指标。
Resuscitation. 2021 Sep;166:121-128. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.05.018. Epub 2021 Jun 23.
8
Laryngeal mask airway versus bag-mask ventilation or endotracheal intubation for neonatal resuscitation.喉罩气道与面罩通气或气管插管用于新生儿复苏的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Mar 15;3(3):CD003314. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003314.pub3.
9
Monitoring lung aeration during respiratory support in preterm infants at birth.出生时对早产儿呼吸支持期间的肺通气进行监测。
PLoS One. 2014 Jul 16;9(7):e102729. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0102729. eCollection 2014.
10
Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) for preterm neonates after extubation.拔管后早产儿使用鼻间歇正压通气(NIPPV)与鼻持续气道正压通气(NCPAP)的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 1;2(2):CD003212. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003212.pub3.

引用本文的文献

1
Inhaled Nitric Oxide for Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia-Associated Pulmonary Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis.吸入一氧化氮治疗支气管肺发育不良相关肺动脉高压:一项系统评价与叙述性综合分析
Neonatology. 2025;122(4):467-476. doi: 10.1159/000545034. Epub 2025 Mar 3.