• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器人辅助肝切除患者腹腔镜肝切除日本难度评分的外部验证。

External validation of the Japanese difficulty score for laparoscopic hepatectomy in patients undergoing robotic-assisted hepatectomy.

机构信息

Division of HPB Surgery, Department of Surgery, Atrium Health - Carolinas Medical Center, 1025 Morehead Medical Drive, Suite 600, Charlotte, NC, 28204, USA.

Division of HPB Surgery, Department of Surgery, Atrium Health - Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, NC, USA.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2023 Sep;37(9):7288-7294. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10330-4. Epub 2023 Aug 9.

DOI:10.1007/s00464-023-10330-4
PMID:37558825
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The Japanese difficulty score (JDS) categorizes laparoscopic hepatectomy into low, intermediate, and high complexity procedures, and correlates with operative and postoperative outcomes. We sought to perform a validation study to determine if the JDS correlates with operative and postoperative indicators of surgical complexity for patients undergoing robotic-assisted hepatectomy.

METHODS

Retrospective review of 657 minimally invasive hepatectomy procedures was performed between January 2008 through March 2019. Outcomes included operative time, estimated blood loss (EBL), blood transfusion, complications, post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF), length of stay, 30-day readmission, and 30-day and 90-day mortality. Patients were grouped based on JDS defined as: low (< 4), intermediate (4-6), and high (7 +) complexity procedures. Statistical comparisons were analyzed by ANOVA or χ test.

RESULTS

241 of 657 patients underwent robotic-assisted resection. Of these patients, 137 were included in the analysis based on JDS: 25 low, 58 intermediate, and 54 high. High JDS was associated with more major resections (≥ 4 contiguous segments) versus minor resections (median JDS 8 vs. 5, P < 0.0001). High JDS was associated with significantly longer operative times, higher EBL, and more blood transfusions. High JDS was associated with higher rates of PHLF at 16.7%, compared with 5.2% intermediate and 0.0% low, (P = 0.018). Complication rates, 30-day readmissions, and mortality rates were similar between groups. Median LOS was longer in patients with high JDS compared with intermediate and low (4 days vs. 3 days vs. 2 days; P = 0.0005).

DISCUSSION

Higher JDS was associated with multiple indicators of operative complexity, including greater extent of resection, increased operative time, EBL, blood transfusion, PHLF, and LOS. This validation study supports the ability of the JDS to categorize patients undergoing robotic-assisted hepatectomy by complexity.

摘要

简介

日本难度评分(JDS)将腹腔镜肝切除术分为低、中和高复杂程度的手术,并与手术和术后结果相关。我们试图进行一项验证研究,以确定 JDS 是否与接受机器人辅助肝切除术的患者的手术复杂性的手术和术后指标相关。

方法

回顾性分析了 2008 年 1 月至 2019 年 3 月期间进行的 657 例微创肝切除术。结果包括手术时间、估计失血量(EBL)、输血、并发症、术后肝衰竭(PHLF)、住院时间、30 天再入院率和 30 天及 90 天死亡率。根据 JDS 将患者分为低(<4)、中(4-6)和高(7+)复杂程度的手术。通过 ANOVA 或 χ 检验分析统计学比较。

结果

657 例患者中有 241 例接受了机器人辅助切除术。在这些患者中,根据 JDS 有 137 例纳入分析:25 例低、58 例中、54 例高。高 JDS 与更多的主要切除术(≥4 个连续节段)相比,与次要切除术相关(中位数 JDS 为 8 比 5,P<0.0001)。高 JDS 与手术时间延长、EBL 升高和输血增加相关。高 JDS 与更高的 PHLF 发生率相关,为 16.7%,而中 JDS 为 5.2%,低 JDS 为 0.0%(P=0.018)。各组并发症发生率、30 天再入院率和死亡率相似。与中 JDS 和低 JDS 相比,高 JDS 患者的中位 LOS 更长(4 天比 3 天比 2 天;P=0.0005)。

讨论

高 JDS 与手术复杂性的多个指标相关,包括切除范围更大、手术时间延长、EBL、输血、PHLF 和 LOS。这项验证研究支持 JDS 对接受机器人辅助肝切除术的患者进行分类的能力。

相似文献

1
External validation of the Japanese difficulty score for laparoscopic hepatectomy in patients undergoing robotic-assisted hepatectomy.机器人辅助肝切除患者腹腔镜肝切除日本难度评分的外部验证。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Sep;37(9):7288-7294. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10330-4. Epub 2023 Aug 9.
2
Comparative clinical outcomes of robot-assisted liver resection versus laparoscopic liver resection: A meta-analysis.机器人辅助肝切除术与腹腔镜肝切除术的临床疗效比较:荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 13;15(10):e0240593. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240593. eCollection 2020.
3
Effect of IWATE laparoscopic difficulty score on postoperative outcomes and costs for robotic hepatectomy: Are complex resections more expensive?岩手腹腔镜困难评分对机器人肝切除术术后结局和成本的影响:复杂切除术更昂贵吗?
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2024 Jul;31(7):446-454. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.12003. Epub 2024 May 27.
4
Analysis of Clinical Outcomes After Robotic Hepatectomy Applying the Western-Model Southampton Laparoscopic Difficulty Scoring System. An Experience From a Tertiary US Hepatobiliary Center.应用西方模型南安普敦腹腔镜难度评分系统分析机器人肝切除术的临床结果。来自美国一家三级肝胆中心的经验。
Am Surg. 2023 Sep;89(9):3788-3793. doi: 10.1177/00031348231173948. Epub 2023 Jun 2.
5
Major hepatectomy in elderly patients: possible benefit from robotic platform utilization.老年患者的大肝切除术:机器人平台应用的可能获益。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Aug;37(8):6228-6234. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10062-5. Epub 2023 May 12.
6
Risk factors and outcomes in patients undergoing minimally invasive hepatectomy with unplanned conversion: a contemporary NSQIP analysis.计划外中转行微创肝切除术患者的风险因素和结局:一项当代 NSQIP 分析。
HPB (Oxford). 2023 May;25(5):577-588. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2023.01.018. Epub 2023 Feb 2.
7
IWATE criteria are associated with perioperative outcomes in robotic hepatectomy: a retrospective review of 225 resections.岩手标准与机器人肝切除术的围手术期结果相关:225 例切除术的回顾性分析。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Feb;36(2):889-895. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08345-w. Epub 2021 Feb 19.
8
Validity of the Institut Mutualiste Montsouris classification system for robotic liver resection.蒙苏里互助会分类系统在机器人肝脏切除术中的有效性
HPB (Oxford). 2023 Sep;25(9):1022-1029. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2023.05.004. Epub 2023 May 9.
9
Robotic versus laparoscopic hepatectomy: a matched comparison.机器人与腹腔镜肝切除术的比较:一项匹配对照研究。
Ann Surg. 2014 Mar;259(3):549-55. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000250.
10
Propensity score matched comparison of robotic and open major hepatectomy for malignant liver tumors.机器人与开放性大肝切除术治疗恶性肝肿瘤的倾向评分匹配比较。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Sep;36(9):6724-6732. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08948-3. Epub 2022 Jan 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Advanced approaches to loco-regional and surgical management for hepatocellular carcinoma.肝细胞癌局部区域及手术治疗的先进方法
J Gastrointest Oncol. 2024 Dec 31;15(6):2739-2742. doi: 10.21037/jgo-2024-879. Epub 2024 Dec 28.
2
Precise planning based on 3D-printed dry-laboratory models can reduce perioperative complications of laparoscopic surgery for complex hepatobiliary diseases: a preoperative cohort study.基于 3D 打印干式实验室模型的精确规划可以减少复杂肝胆疾病腹腔镜手术的围手术期并发症:一项术前队列研究。
BMC Surg. 2024 May 11;24(1):148. doi: 10.1186/s12893-024-02441-z.

本文引用的文献

1
Comprehensive multi-omics analysis identified core molecular processes in esophageal cancer and revealed GNGT2 as a potential prognostic marker.综合多组学分析鉴定了食管癌的核心分子过程,并揭示了 GNGT2 作为一个潜在的预后标志物。
World J Gastroenterol. 2019 Dec 28;25(48):6890-6901. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i48.6890.
2
The REDCap consortium: Building an international community of software platform partners.REDCap 联盟:构建软件平台合作伙伴的国际社区。
J Biomed Inform. 2019 Jul;95:103208. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103208. Epub 2019 May 9.
3
Robotic liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review.
机器人肝切除术治疗肝细胞癌:系统评价。
Int J Med Robot. 2019 Aug;15(4):e2004. doi: 10.1002/rcs.2004. Epub 2019 May 28.
4
Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic major liver resection: analysis of outcomes from a single center.机器人辅助与腹腔镜下肝切除术治疗原发性肝癌的对比:单中心回顾性研究
HPB (Oxford). 2019 Jul;21(7):906-911. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2018.11.011. Epub 2019 Jan 5.
5
Rates of Serious Complications Estimated by the ACS-NSQIP Surgical Risk Calculator in Predicting Oncologic Outcomes of Patients Treated with Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Pancreatic Head Cancer.美国外科医师协会手术风险计算器预测胰头癌行胰十二指肠切除术患者的肿瘤学结局中严重并发症的发生率。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2019 Jun;23(6):1180-1187. doi: 10.1007/s11605-018-4041-1. Epub 2018 Nov 21.
6
Validation of index-based IWATE criteria as an improved difficulty scoring system for laparoscopic liver resection.基于指数的 IWATE 标准作为腹腔镜肝切除术改良难度评分系统的验证。
Surgery. 2019 Apr;165(4):731-740. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2018.10.012. Epub 2018 Nov 13.
7
Development and validation of a difficulty score to predict intraoperative complications during laparoscopic liver resection.开发并验证一种难度评分系统,以预测腹腔镜肝切除术中的术中并发症。
Br J Surg. 2018 Aug;105(9):1182-1191. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10821. Epub 2018 May 8.
8
The Southampton Consensus Guidelines for Laparoscopic Liver Surgery: From Indication to Implementation.《南安普敦腹腔镜肝手术共识指南:从适应证到实施》。
Ann Surg. 2018 Jul;268(1):11-18. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002524.
9
Association Between Compliance with Triage Directions from an Organized State Trauma System and Trauma Outcomes.来自有组织的州创伤系统的分诊指导的依从性与创伤结局之间的关联。
J Am Coll Surg. 2017 Oct;225(4):508-515. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2017.06.016. Epub 2017 Aug 30.
10
Anatomical and embryological perspectives in laparoscopic complete mesocoloic excision of splenic flexure cancers.腹腔镜下脾曲结肠癌全结肠系膜切除术的解剖学和胚胎学视角。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Mar;32(3):1202-1208. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5792-6. Epub 2017 Aug 15.