Sharareh Nasser, Adesoba Taiwo P, Wallace Andrea S, Bybee Sara, Potter Lindsey N, Seligman Hilary, Wilson Fernando A
Department of Population Health Sciences, Spence Fox Eccles School of Medicine at the University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Department of Health Policy and Management, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA.
J Gen Intern Med. 2024 Jan;39(1):52-60. doi: 10.1007/s11606-023-08360-8. Epub 2023 Aug 9.
Food insecurity (FI) often co-exists with other social risk factors, which makes addressing it particularly challenging. The degree of association between FI and other social risk factors across different levels of income and before and during the COVID-19 pandemic is currently unknown, impeding the ability to design effective interventions for addressing these co-existing social risk factors.
To determine the association between FI and other social risk factors overall and across different levels of income-poverty ratios and before (2019) and during (2020-2021) the pandemic.
We used nationally representative data from the 2019-2021 National Health Interview Survey for our cross-sectional analysis. Social risk factors available in NHIS included difficulties paying for medical bills, difficulties paying for medications, receiving income assistance, receiving rental assistance, and "not working last week".
93,047 adults (≥18 years old).
Individuals with other social risk factors (except receiving income assistance) were more likely to report FI, even after adjusting for income and education inequalities. While poverty leads to a higher prevalence of FI, associations between FI and other social risk factors were stronger among people with higher incomes, which may be related to their ineligibility for social safety net programs. Associations were similar before and during the pandemic, perhaps due to the extensive provision of social safety net programs during the pandemic.
Future research should explore how access to a variety of social safety net programs may impact the association between social risk factors. With the expiration of most pandemic-related social supports, further research and monitoring are also needed to examine FI in the context of increasing food and housing costs. Our findings may also have implications for the expansion of income-based program eligibility criteria and screening for social risk factors across all patients and not only low-income people.
粮食不安全(FI)常常与其他社会风险因素并存,这使得解决该问题极具挑战性。目前尚不清楚在不同收入水平以及新冠疫情之前和期间,FI与其他社会风险因素之间的关联程度,这阻碍了设计有效干预措施以解决这些并存的社会风险因素的能力。
确定总体上以及在不同收入贫困率水平下,以及在疫情之前(2019年)和期间(2020 - 2021年)FI与其他社会风险因素之间的关联。
我们使用了2019 - 2021年全国健康访谈调查中的全国代表性数据进行横断面分析。美国国家健康访谈调查中可用的社会风险因素包括支付医疗账单困难、支付药物费用困难、接受收入援助、接受租金援助以及“上周未工作”。
93,047名成年人(≥18岁)。
即使在调整了收入和教育不平等因素之后,有其他社会风险因素(除接受收入援助外)的个体更有可能报告粮食不安全。虽然贫困导致粮食不安全的患病率更高,但在高收入人群中,FI与其他社会风险因素之间的关联更强,这可能与他们无资格获得社会安全网项目有关。疫情之前和期间的关联相似,这可能是由于疫情期间广泛提供了社会安全网项目。
未来的研究应探索获得各种社会安全网项目如何可能影响社会风险因素之间的关联。随着大多数与疫情相关的社会支持到期,还需要进一步的研究和监测,以在食品和住房成本不断上升的背景下检查粮食不安全情况。我们的研究结果也可能对扩大基于收入的项目资格标准以及对所有患者而非仅低收入人群进行社会风险因素筛查具有启示意义。