Sharareh Nasser, Seligman Hilary K, Adesoba Taiwo P, Wallace Andrea S, Hess Rachel, Wilson Fernando A
Department of Population Health Sciences, Spence Fox Eccles School of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
AJPM Focus. 2023 Jun 7;2(3):100113. doi: 10.1016/j.focus.2023.100113. eCollection 2023 Sep.
Food insecurity negatively impacts public health and costs the U.S. healthcare system $53 billion annually. Immigrants are at higher risk of food insecurity. We sought to (1) characterize the prevalence of food insecurity among immigrants (i.e., noncitizens and naturalized citizens) and U.S.-born citizens and (2) determine whether Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program utilization and income-poverty ratio levels impact the relationship between immigration status and food insecurity.
Multivariable logistic regression models were used to determine the odds of food insecurity (dependent variables) using nationally representative data from the 2019-2020 National Health Interview Survey. Independent variables included immigration status, Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program utilization, income-poverty ratio, and other important demographics. AORs with their 95% CIs are reported. Analysis was conducted in 2022.
After controlling for independent variables, noncitizens had 1.28 (95% CI=1.02, 1.61) times higher odds of food insecurity than U.S.-born citizens. There was no food insecurity disparity between naturalized citizens and U.S.-born citizens. However, the association between immigration status and food insecurity varied significantly at different levels of Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program utilization and income-poverty ratio. There were no food insecurity disparities between immigrants and U.S.-born citizens when they utilized the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program and when they had an income below 200% federal poverty level. Noncitizens who did not utilize the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program or those with an income above 200% federal poverty level were more likely to report food insecurity than their U.S.-born counterparts (AOR=1.32, 95% CI=1.01, 1.73 and AOR=1.88, 95% CI=1.24, 2.86, respectively). Moreover, naturalized citizens with an income above 200% federal poverty level were also more likely to report food insecurity than their U.S.-born counterparts (AOR=1.61, 95% CI=1.21, 2.14).
Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program utilization may likely eliminate food insecurity disparities among immigrants and U.S.-born citizens. However, among non-Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program utilizers, significant food insecurity disparities remained between noncitizens and U.S.-born citizens after adjusting for independent variables. In addition, among individuals with incomes above 200% federal poverty level, significant food insecurity disparities were observed between immigrants and U.S.-born citizens. More research is needed to further understand the role that fear of deportation, ineligibility or lack of awareness about eligibility for the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, and other factors such as structural racism play in food insecurity disparities between immigrants and U.S.-born citizens.
粮食不安全对公众健康产生负面影响,每年给美国医疗保健系统造成530亿美元的损失。移民面临粮食不安全的风险更高。我们试图(1)描述移民(即非公民和入籍公民)和美国本土出生公民中粮食不安全的患病率,以及(2)确定补充营养援助计划的使用情况和收入贫困率水平是否会影响移民身份与粮食不安全之间的关系。
使用多变量逻辑回归模型,利用2019 - 2020年全国健康访谈调查的全国代表性数据来确定粮食不安全(因变量)的几率。自变量包括移民身份、补充营养援助计划的使用情况、收入贫困率以及其他重要的人口统计学因素。报告了带有95%置信区间的调整后比值比(AOR)。分析于2022年进行。
在控制自变量后,非公民面临粮食不安全的几率比美国本土出生公民高1.28倍(95%置信区间 = 1.02, 1.61)。入籍公民和美国本土出生公民之间不存在粮食不安全差异。然而,在不同水平的补充营养援助计划使用情况和收入贫困率下,移民身份与粮食不安全之间的关联存在显著差异。当移民和美国本土出生公民使用补充营养援助计划以及收入低于联邦贫困线200%时,他们之间不存在粮食不安全差异。未使用补充营养援助计划的非公民或收入高于联邦贫困线200%的非公民比美国本土出生的同龄人更有可能报告粮食不安全(调整后比值比分别为1.32, 95%置信区间 = 1.01, 1.73和1.88, 95%置信区间 = 1.24, 2.86)。此外,收入高于联邦贫困线200%的入籍公民比美国本土出生的同龄人也更有可能报告粮食不安全(调整后比值比 = 1.61, 95%置信区间 = 1.