Basque Centre for Climate Change (BC3), Scientific Campus of the University of the Basque Country, Leioa, Spain.
Ikerbasque Basque Foundation for Science, Bilbao, Spain.
Nature. 2023 Aug;620(7975):813-823. doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-06406-9. Epub 2023 Aug 9.
Twenty-five years since foundational publications on valuing ecosystem services for human well-being, addressing the global biodiversity crisis still implies confronting barriers to incorporating nature's diverse values into decision-making. These barriers include powerful interests supported by current norms and legal rules such as property rights, which determine whose values and which values of nature are acted on. A better understanding of how and why nature is (under)valued is more urgent than ever. Notwithstanding agreements to incorporate nature's values into actions, including the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework (GBF) and the UN Sustainable Development Goals, predominant environmental and development policies still prioritize a subset of values, particularly those linked to markets, and ignore other ways people relate to and benefit from nature. Arguably, a 'values crisis' underpins the intertwined crises of biodiversity loss and climate change, pandemic emergence and socio-environmental injustices. On the basis of more than 50,000 scientific publications, policy documents and Indigenous and local knowledge sources, the Intergovernmental Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) assessed knowledge on nature's diverse values and valuation methods to gain insights into their role in policymaking and fuller integration into decisions. Applying this evidence, combinations of values-centred approaches are proposed to improve valuation and address barriers to uptake, ultimately leveraging transformative changes towards more just (that is, fair treatment of people and nature, including inter- and intragenerational equity) and sustainable futures.
自关于为人类福祉评估生态系统服务价值的基础文献发表以来已经过去了 25 年,解决全球生物多样性危机仍然意味着要克服将自然的多种价值纳入决策的障碍。这些障碍包括当前规范和法律规则所支持的强大利益,例如决定谁的价值观和自然的哪些价值观将被付诸行动的产权。比以往任何时候都更需要更好地理解自然是如何以及为何被(低估)的。尽管人们已经同意将自然的价值纳入行动,包括《昆明-蒙特利尔全球生物多样性框架》(GBF)和联合国可持续发展目标,但主要的环境和发展政策仍然优先考虑一部分价值,特别是那些与市场相关的价值,而忽略了人们与自然的其他关系和从自然中受益的方式。可以说,“价值观危机”是生物多样性丧失和气候变化、大流行病出现以及社会环境不公正等交织危机的根源。政府间生物多样性和生态系统服务平台(IPBES)根据超过 50,000 篇科学出版物、政策文件以及土著和地方知识来源,评估了关于自然多种价值和估值方法的知识,以深入了解它们在决策中的作用,并更充分地将其纳入决策。利用这些证据,提出了以价值观为中心的方法组合,以改进评估并解决采用的障碍,最终推动向更加公正(即公平对待人和自然,包括代际和代内公平)和可持续的未来的变革。