Hopster Jeroen
Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Philos Technol. 2025;38(3):124. doi: 10.1007/s13347-025-00962-w. Epub 2025 Aug 30.
Critical reflection on the material, environmental, and social conditions underlying technology remains peripheral to the field of technology ethics. In this commentary, I underwrite the diagnosis by Vandemeulebroucke et al. (2025) that the field suffers from an "extractivist blindspot", but propose a somewhat different cure. First, rather than focusing on the material ontogenesis of technical artefacts, a more radical turn away from artefacts is called for, towards layered socio-technical systems as the field's core object of analysis. Second, notwithstanding the merits of their intercultural proposal, I argue that in overcoming extractivism the conceptual resources of more adjacent philosophical traditions should not be overlooked.
对技术背后的物质、环境和社会条件进行批判性反思在技术伦理领域仍处于边缘地位。在这篇评论中,我认同范德默勒布罗克等人(2025年)的诊断,即该领域存在“榨取主义盲点”,但提出了一种略有不同的解决办法。首先,与其关注技术人工制品的物质生成,不如更彻底地远离人工制品,转向分层的社会技术系统,将其作为该领域的核心分析对象。其次,尽管他们的跨文化提议有其优点,但我认为,在克服榨取主义时,不应忽视更相近哲学传统的概念资源。