Coulibaly Karna, Bousmah Marwân-Al-Qays, Ravalihasy Andrainolo, Taéron Corinne, Mbiribindi Romain, Senne Jean-Noël, Gubert Flore, Gosselin Anne, Desgrées du Loû Annabel
Université Paris Cité, IRD, Inserm, Ceped, F-75006, Paris, France.
French Collaborative Institute on Migrations, CNRS, Aubervilliers, France.
SSM Popul Health. 2023 Jul 23;23:101468. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2023.101468. eCollection 2023 Sep.
Biomedical HIV prevention tools are available in France to prevent new infections. However, evidence suggests a lack of knowledge of these tools among sub-Saharan African immigrants, who are particularly affected by HIV due to social hardship, an indirect factor of HIV acquisition. We analysed the impact of an empowerment-based intervention on the knowledge of treatment as prevention (TasP), pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) and post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) in a population of precarious sub-Saharan African immigrants.
Data were collected throughout the MAKASI project. Following an outreach approach, participants were recruited in public places based on their precarious situations and followed for six months (0, 3, 6 months) between 2018 and 2021. Participants were randomized into two groups and received an empowerment intervention sequentially (stepped wedge design). We used random-effects logistic regression models to evaluate the intervention effect on the knowledge of biomedical HIV prevention tools. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04468724.
The majority of the participants were men (77.5%), and almost half of them had arrived in France within 2 years prior to inclusion (49.3%). At baseline, 56% of participants knew about TasP, 6% knew about PEP and 4% knew about PrEP. Receiving the intervention increased the odds of knowing about PEP (aOR = 2.02 [1.09-3.75]; p < 0.026). Intervention effects were observed for TasP and PrEP only after 6 months. We found significant time effects for PEP (at 3 months, aOR = 4.26 [2.33-7.80]; p < 0.001; at 6 months, aOR = 18.28 [7.39-45.24]; p < 0.001) and PrEP (at 3 months, aOR = 4.02 [2.10-7.72]; p < 0.001; at 6 months, aOR = 28.33 [11.16-71.91]; p < 0.001).
We showed that the intervention increased the knowledge of biomedical HIV prevention tools. The effect of the intervention was coupled with an important time effect. This suggested that exposure to the intervention together with other sources of information contributed to increased knowledge of biomedical HIV prevention tools among precarious sub-Saharan African immigrants.
法国有生物医学HIV预防工具可用于预防新的感染。然而,有证据表明,撒哈拉以南非洲移民对这些工具缺乏了解,由于社会困境这一感染HIV的间接因素,他们尤其容易感染HIV。我们分析了一项基于赋权的干预措施对不稳定的撒哈拉以南非洲移民群体在治疗即预防(TasP)、暴露前预防(PrEP)和暴露后预防(PEP)知识方面的影响。
在整个MAKASI项目中收集数据。采用外展方法,根据参与者的不稳定状况在公共场所招募他们,并在2018年至2021年期间随访6个月(0、3、6个月)。参与者被随机分为两组,并依次接受赋权干预(阶梯楔形设计)。我们使用随机效应逻辑回归模型来评估干预措施对生物医学HIV预防工具知识的影响。ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT04468724。
大多数参与者为男性(77.5%),其中近一半在纳入研究前2年内抵达法国(49.3%)。在基线时,56%的参与者了解TasP,6%了解PEP,4%了解PrEP。接受干预增加了了解PEP的几率(调整后的比值比[aOR]=2.02[1.09 - 3.75];p<0.026)。仅在6个月后观察到干预措施对TasP和PrEP的影响。我们发现PEP(3个月时,aOR = 4.26[2.33 - 7.80];p<0.001;6个月时,aOR = 18.28[7.39 - 45.24];p<0.001)和PrEP(3个月时,aOR = 4.02[2.10 - 7.72];p<0.001;6个月时,aOR = 28.33[11.16 - 71.91];p<0.001)有显著的时间效应。
我们表明该干预措施增加了对生物医学HIV预防工具的了解。干预措施的效果伴随着重要的时间效应。这表明接触干预措施以及其他信息来源有助于增加不稳定的撒哈拉以南非洲移民对生物医学HIV预防工具的了解。