Suppr超能文献

行为或半球不对称:是否存在默认选项?

Behavioral or hemispheric asymmetry: is there a default option?

作者信息

Schwartz S, Kirsner K

出版信息

Brain Cogn. 1986 Jul;5(3):377-84. doi: 10.1016/0278-2626(86)90039-4.

Abstract

The presence of acuity gradients as a moderating variable in hemifield research is not in question. Their importance as a determinant of hemifield differences is unclear, however. The major issues are as follows. First, do vertical displays provide an appropriate control for the acuity gradient? Second, do the initial letters of a word play a critical role in word recognition, either in information-theoretic terms or because the lexicon is itself organized around access codes based on the initial letter or letters of words? Third, do behavioral and hemispheric accounts provide equally attractive explanations of Task Level X Visual Field interactions? Fourth, if the two accounts are equally attractive on empirical grounds, which is to be preferred? Each of these issues is addressed in this reply to M. P. Bryden's (1986, Brain and Cognition, 5, 362-368) and J. Hellige's (1986, Brain and Cognition, 5, 369-376) comments on our article (K. Kirsner & S. Schwartz 1986, Brain and Cognition, 5, 354-361).

摘要

在半视野研究中,敏锐度梯度作为一个调节变量的存在是毋庸置疑的。然而,其作为半视野差异决定因素的重要性尚不清楚。主要问题如下。第一,垂直显示是否能为敏锐度梯度提供适当的对照?第二,单词的首字母在单词识别中是否起着关键作用,无论是从信息论的角度,还是因为词汇本身是围绕基于单词首字母的访问代码组织的?第三,行为学和半球功能的解释对任务水平X视野交互作用是否提供了同样有吸引力的解释?第四,如果基于实证依据这两种解释同样有吸引力,哪一种更可取?在对M. P. 布赖登(1986年,《大脑与认知》,第5卷,第362 - 368页)和J. 赫利格(1986年,《大脑与认知》,第5卷,第369 - 376页)对我们文章(K. 基尔纳和S. 施瓦茨,1986年,《大脑与认知》,第5卷,第354 - 361页)的评论的回复中,上述每个问题都得到了探讨。

相似文献

5
On the possible dangers of using horizontal word displays in visual field studies.
Brain Cogn. 1986 Jul;5(3):362-8. doi: 10.1016/0278-2626(86)90037-0.
6
More things in heaven and earth than are dreamt of in the initial letter acuity hypothesis.
Brain Lang. 1987 Jul;31(2):364-71. doi: 10.1016/0093-934x(87)90080-0.
9
Violation of the retinal acuity gradient in a detection task.在一项检测任务中违反视网膜敏锐度梯度。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 1982 Nov;52(1-2):23-31. doi: 10.1016/0001-6918(82)90023-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Future research directions in laterality.关于偏侧性的未来研究方向。
Neuropsychol Rev. 1997 Sep;7(3):107-26. doi: 10.1023/b:nerv.0000005947.20270.80.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验