Schwartz S, Kirsner K
Brain Cogn. 1986 Jul;5(3):377-84. doi: 10.1016/0278-2626(86)90039-4.
The presence of acuity gradients as a moderating variable in hemifield research is not in question. Their importance as a determinant of hemifield differences is unclear, however. The major issues are as follows. First, do vertical displays provide an appropriate control for the acuity gradient? Second, do the initial letters of a word play a critical role in word recognition, either in information-theoretic terms or because the lexicon is itself organized around access codes based on the initial letter or letters of words? Third, do behavioral and hemispheric accounts provide equally attractive explanations of Task Level X Visual Field interactions? Fourth, if the two accounts are equally attractive on empirical grounds, which is to be preferred? Each of these issues is addressed in this reply to M. P. Bryden's (1986, Brain and Cognition, 5, 362-368) and J. Hellige's (1986, Brain and Cognition, 5, 369-376) comments on our article (K. Kirsner & S. Schwartz 1986, Brain and Cognition, 5, 354-361).
在半视野研究中,敏锐度梯度作为一个调节变量的存在是毋庸置疑的。然而,其作为半视野差异决定因素的重要性尚不清楚。主要问题如下。第一,垂直显示是否能为敏锐度梯度提供适当的对照?第二,单词的首字母在单词识别中是否起着关键作用,无论是从信息论的角度,还是因为词汇本身是围绕基于单词首字母的访问代码组织的?第三,行为学和半球功能的解释对任务水平X视野交互作用是否提供了同样有吸引力的解释?第四,如果基于实证依据这两种解释同样有吸引力,哪一种更可取?在对M. P. 布赖登(1986年,《大脑与认知》,第5卷,第362 - 368页)和J. 赫利格(1986年,《大脑与认知》,第5卷,第369 - 376页)对我们文章(K. 基尔纳和S. 施瓦茨,1986年,《大脑与认知》,第5卷,第354 - 361页)的评论的回复中,上述每个问题都得到了探讨。