Lineham Beth, Wijayathunga Harin, Moran Emma, Shuweihdi Farag, Gupta Harun, Pandit Hemant, Wijayathunga Nagitha
Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, UK.
University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Osteoarthr Cartil Open. 2023 Jul 28;5(3):100388. doi: 10.1016/j.ocarto.2023.100388. eCollection 2023 Sep.
Compositional-MRI parameters enable the assessment of cartilage ultrastructure. Correlation of these parameters with clinical outcomes is unclear. This systematic review investigated the correlation of various compositional- MRI parameters with clinical outcome measures following cartilage repair or regeneration interventions in the knee.
This study was registered with PROSPERO and reported in accordance with PRISMA. PubMed, Institute of Science Index, Scopus, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Embase databases were searched. All studies, regardless of type, that presented correlation of compositional- MRI parameters with clinical outcome measures were included. Two researchers independently performed data extraction and QUADAS-2 analysis. Compositional-MRI parameter change following intervention and correlation with clinical outcome measures were evaluated.
19 studies were included. Risk of bias was generally low. 5 different compositional parameters were observed from the included studies. However, due to the significant variability in the reporting of compositional-MRI parameters across studies, meta-analyses were possible only for T2 values and T2 index values (T2 value of repair cartilage relative to normal cartilage). Correlation of T2 values of repair cartilage with clinical outcome score was r = 0.33 [0.15, 0.52]. Correlation of T2 index with clinical outcome score was r = 0.52 [0.32, 0.77].
Correlation between T2 values and clinical outcome scores following knee cartilage repair were found. The heterogeneity of the correlations extracted from the included studies limited the scope for the meta-analysis. Thus, standardised, high-quality studies are required for better assessment of correlation between compositional MRI parameters and clinical outcome measures after cartilage repair.
PROSPERO CRD42021287364.Study protocol available on PROSPERO website.
成分磁共振成像(MRI)参数可用于评估软骨超微结构。这些参数与临床结局的相关性尚不清楚。本系统评价研究了膝关节软骨修复或再生干预后,各种成分MRI参数与临床结局指标之间的相关性。
本研究在国际前瞻性系统评价注册库(PROSPERO)登记,并按照系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)进行报告。检索了PubMed、科学引文索引、Scopus、Cochrane对照试验中心注册库和Embase数据库。纳入所有呈现成分MRI参数与临床结局指标相关性的研究,无论其类型如何。两名研究人员独立进行数据提取和QUADAS-2分析。评估干预后成分MRI参数的变化及其与临床结局指标的相关性。
纳入19项研究。偏倚风险总体较低。从纳入研究中观察到5种不同的成分参数。然而,由于各研究中成分MRI参数报告的显著差异,仅对T2值和T2指数值(修复软骨相对于正常软骨的T2值)进行了Meta分析。修复软骨的T2值与临床结局评分的相关性为r = 0.33 [0.15, 0.52]。T2指数与临床结局评分的相关性为r = 0.52 [0.32, 0.77]。
发现膝关节软骨修复后T2值与临床结局评分之间存在相关性。纳入研究中提取的相关性的异质性限制了Meta分析的范围。因此,需要标准化的高质量研究,以更好地评估软骨修复后成分MRI参数与临床结局指标之间的相关性。
PROSPERO CRD4202128