• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

铰链假体在单髁膝关节置换翻修中的应用:来自英格兰、威尔士和北爱尔兰国家关节登记处的数据描述性分析。

Hinge prostheses in the revision of unicompartmental knee replacement: a descriptive analysis of data from the national joint registry for England, Wales and Northern Ireland.

机构信息

Newcastle Upon Tyne NHS Trust, Freeman Hospital, Freeman Road, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.

School of Medicine, Keele University, Newcastle-under-Lyme, UK.

出版信息

Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024 Jan;144(1):23-30. doi: 10.1007/s00402-023-05010-w. Epub 2023 Aug 10.

DOI:10.1007/s00402-023-05010-w
PMID:37561165
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR) is an effective surgical strategy in patients with isolated medial or lateral compartment osteoarthritis. Study aims were to (1) describe the epidemiology of patients undergoing revision of UKR to a hinge knee replacement (HKR); (2) identify factors influencing time to revision; (3) evaluate HKR survival.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An analysis of National Joint Registry data was undertaken, exploring revision of UKR to HKR between 2007 and April 2021. Descriptive analysis of eligible patients and Cox Regression to identify key determinants of time to revision were performed. Failure of HKR post-revision was assessed using survival analysis.

RESULTS

111 patients underwent revision of UKR to HKR. Median age at revision was 70 years and most common indications were instability (n = 42) and infection (n = 22). The most common implant was a rotating HKR. Significant independent factors associated with earlier revision were periprosthetic fracture (p = 0.03) and malalignment (p = 0.03). Progressive osteoarthritis (p = 0.01) and higher ASA grades (3: p = 0.01, 4: p < 0.01) delayed time to revision; patient sex and age were not significant factors. Ten patients required subsequent re-revision; median age at re-revision was 61 years. HKR revised from UKR had an 89.3% revision-free risk at 5 years. Male sex (p < 0.01) and younger age (p < 0.01) were associated with re-revision.

CONCLUSIONS

Factors associated with time to revision may be used to counsel patients prior to UKR. The survivorship of the HKR of 89.3% at 5 years is concerning and careful consideration should be given when using this level of constraint when revising UKR in younger or male patients.

摘要

介绍

单髁膝关节置换术(UKR)是治疗内侧或外侧间室骨关节炎的有效手术策略。本研究的目的是:(1)描述接受铰链膝关节置换术(HKR)翻修的 UKR 患者的流行病学特征;(2)确定影响翻修时间的因素;(3)评估 HKR 的生存率。

材料和方法

对国家关节登记处的数据进行了分析,研究了 2007 年至 2021 年 4 月间 UKR 翻修为 HKR 的情况。对符合条件的患者进行描述性分析,并采用 Cox 回归分析确定翻修时间的关键决定因素。通过生存分析评估 HKR 翻修后的失败情况。

结果

111 例患者接受 UKR 翻修为 HKR。翻修时的中位年龄为 70 岁,最常见的适应证为不稳定(n=42)和感染(n=22)。最常见的植入物是旋转 HKR。与更早翻修相关的显著独立因素包括假体周围骨折(p=0.03)和对线不良(p=0.03)。进展性骨关节炎(p=0.01)和较高的 ASA 分级(3:p=0.01,4:p<0.01)延迟了翻修时间;患者性别和年龄不是显著因素。10 例患者需要再次翻修;再次翻修时的中位年龄为 61 岁。从 UKR 翻修为 HKR 的患者在 5 年内的无翻修风险为 89.3%。男性(p<0.01)和年龄较小(p<0.01)与再次翻修相关。

结论

与翻修时间相关的因素可用于 UKR 前对患者进行咨询。5 年内 HKR 的生存率为 89.3%,令人担忧,在对年轻或男性患者的 UKR 进行翻修时,应慎重考虑使用这种程度的限制。

相似文献

1
Hinge prostheses in the revision of unicompartmental knee replacement: a descriptive analysis of data from the national joint registry for England, Wales and Northern Ireland.铰链假体在单髁膝关节置换翻修中的应用:来自英格兰、威尔士和北爱尔兰国家关节登记处的数据描述性分析。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024 Jan;144(1):23-30. doi: 10.1007/s00402-023-05010-w. Epub 2023 Aug 10.
2
A Comparison of the Periprosthetic Fracture Rate of Unicompartmental and Total Knee Replacements: An Analysis of Data of >100,000 Knee Replacements from the National Joint Registry for England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man and Hospital Episode Statistics.单髁膝关节置换与全膝关节置换假体周围骨折发生率的比较:对来自英格兰、威尔士、北爱尔兰及马恩岛国家关节注册中心和医院病历统计的超过100,000例膝关节置换数据的分析
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2023 Dec 6;105(23):1857-1866. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.22.01302. Epub 2023 Sep 21.
3
A matched comparison of cementless unicompartmental and total knee replacement outcomes based on the National Joint Registry for England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man.基于英格兰、威尔士、北爱尔兰和马恩岛国家联合注册中心的研究,对非骨水泥单间室置换与全膝关节置换的结果进行了配对比较。
Acta Orthop. 2022 May 24;93:478-487. doi: 10.2340/17453674.2022.2743.
4
A Matched Comparison of Long-Term Outcomes of Total and Unicompartmental Knee Replacements in Different Ages Based on National Databases: Analysis of Data From the National Joint Registry for England, Wales, Northern Ireland, and the Isle of Man.基于国家数据库的不同年龄段全膝关节置换与单髁膝关节置换长期结局的配对比较:来自英格兰、威尔士、北爱尔兰和马恩岛国家关节登记处的数据分析。
J Arthroplasty. 2022 Feb;37(2):243-251. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2021.09.018. Epub 2021 Oct 5.
5
Patients Receiving a Primary Unicompartmental Knee Replacement Have a Higher Risk of Revision but a Lower Risk of Mortality Than Predicted Had They Received a Total Knee Replacement: Data From the National Joint Registry for England, Wales, Northern Ireland, and the Isle of Man.接受单髁膝关节置换术的患者比预计接受全膝关节置换术的患者具有更高的翻修风险,但死亡率更低:来自英格兰、威尔士、北爱尔兰和马恩岛国家关节登记处的数据。
J Arthroplasty. 2021 Feb;36(2):471-477.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.08.063. Epub 2020 Sep 7.
6
Comparison of the 10-year outcomes of cemented and cementless unicompartmental knee replacements: data from the National Joint Registry for England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man.比较骨水泥型与非骨水泥型单髁膝关节置换术的 10 年疗效:来自英格兰、威尔士、北爱尔兰和马恩岛国家关节注册处的数据。
Acta Orthop. 2020 Feb;91(1):76-81. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2019.1680924. Epub 2019 Oct 22.
7
The Mid- to Long-Term Outcomes of the Lateral Domed Oxford Unicompartmental Knee Replacement: An Analysis From the National Joint Registry for England, Wales, Northern Ireland, and the Isle of Man.外侧穹顶型牛津单髁膝关节置换的中远期疗效:来自英格兰、威尔士、北爱尔兰和马恩岛国家关节登记处的分析。
J Arthroplasty. 2021 Jan;36(1):107-111. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.07.031. Epub 2020 Jul 17.
8
Adverse outcomes after total and unicompartmental knee replacement in 101,330 matched patients: a study of data from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales.101330 例匹配患者全膝关节置换和单髁膝关节置换术后的不良结局:来自英格兰和威尔士国家关节登记处数据的研究。
Lancet. 2014 Oct 18;384(9952):1437-45. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60419-0.
9
Determinants of revision and functional outcome following unicompartmental knee replacement.单髁膝关节置换术后翻修及功能结果的决定因素。
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2014 Sep;22(9):1241-50. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2014.07.006. Epub 2014 Jul 17.
10
The Effect of Surgeon Caseload on the Relative Revision Rate of Cemented and Cementless Unicompartmental Knee Replacements: An Analysis from the National Joint Registry for England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man.外科医生手术量对水泥固定和非水泥固定单髁膝关节置换术后相对翻修率的影响:来自英格兰、威尔士、北爱尔兰和马恩岛国家联合登记处的分析。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2020 Apr 15;102(8):644-653. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.19.01060.

本文引用的文献

1
Temporal trends of primary hinge knee arthroplasty and risk factors associated with revision: National Joint Registry data from 2003 to 2018 for 4921 patients.2003 年至 2018 年全国关节登记处 4921 例患者的原发性铰链膝关节置换术的时间趋势及翻修相关危险因素分析。
Knee. 2022 Jan;34:279-287. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2022.01.004. Epub 2022 Jan 29.
2
A matched comparison of revision rates of cemented Oxford Unicompartmental Knee Replacements with Single and Twin Peg femoral components, based on data from the National Joint Registry for England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man.基于英格兰、威尔士、北爱尔兰和马恩岛国家联合登记处的数据,对单枚和双枚销钉股骨部件的骨水泥型牛津单髁膝关节置换翻修率进行配对比较。
Acta Orthop. 2020 Aug;91(4):420-425. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2020.1748288. Epub 2020 Apr 16.
3
Bearing thickness of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty is a reliable predictor of tibial bone loss during revision to total knee arthroplasty.单髁膝关节置换术中的衬垫厚度是翻修为全膝关节置换术中胫骨骨丢失的可靠预测指标。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2020 May;106(3):429-434. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2019.12.018. Epub 2020 Apr 3.
4
The role of rotating hinge implants in revision total knee arthroplasty.旋转铰链式植入物在全膝关节置换翻修术中的作用。
EFORT Open Rev. 2019 Jun 3;4(6):269-278. doi: 10.1302/2058-5241.4.180070. eCollection 2019 Jun.
5
Unicompartmental knee replacement - Current perspectives.单髁膝关节置换术——当前观点
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2018 Jan-Mar;9(1):17-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2017.11.013. Epub 2017 Nov 28.
6
KNEE ARTHROPLASTY REVISION WITH A CONSTRAINED IMPLANT USING HINGE AND ROTATING TIBIAL BASIS.使用铰链和旋转胫骨基座的受限植入物进行膝关节置换翻修术。
Acta Ortop Bras. 2016 Jan-Feb;24(1):22-6. doi: 10.1590/1413-785220162401153984.
7
Revision of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: implants used and causes of failure.单髁膝关节置换术的翻修:使用的植入物及失败原因
Rev Bras Ortop. 2014 Mar 31;49(2):154-9. doi: 10.1016/j.rboe.2014.03.018. eCollection 2014 Mar-Apr.
8
Adverse outcomes after total and unicompartmental knee replacement in 101,330 matched patients: a study of data from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales.101330 例匹配患者全膝关节置换和单髁膝关节置换术后的不良结局:来自英格兰和威尔士国家关节登记处数据的研究。
Lancet. 2014 Oct 18;384(9952):1437-45. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60419-0.
9
Constraint choice in revision knee arthroplasty.膝关节翻修术中的约束选择。
Int Orthop. 2013 Jul;37(7):1279-84. doi: 10.1007/s00264-013-1929-y. Epub 2013 May 23.
10
Bone loss during revision of unicompartmental to total knee arthroplasty: an analysis of implanted polyethylene thickness from the National Joint Registry data.全膝关节翻修术中单间室置换后骨丢失:来自国家关节登记数据的植入聚乙烯厚度分析。
J Arthroplasty. 2013 Oct;28(9):1571-4. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2013.02.003. Epub 2013 Mar 26.