National Center for AIDS/STD Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China.
National Institute of Environmental and Health, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China.
Aging (Albany NY). 2020 Nov 18;12(22):23129-23145. doi: 10.18632/aging.104078.
Our objectives were to evaluate: 1) the associations of cognitive frailty with various health outcomes including disability, hospitalization, and death; 2) whether the associations differed by multimorbidity. We included data of 5113 Chinese older adults (aged 60+ years) who had baseline cognition and physical frailty assessments (2011 wave) and follow-up for 4 years. About 16.0% (n=820) had cognitive impairment; 6.7% (n=342) had physical frailty; and 1.6% (n=82) met criteria for cognitive frailty. Both cognitive impairment (odds ratios (ORs) range: 1.41 to 2.11) and physical frailty (ORs range: 1.51 to 2.43) were independently associated with basic activities of daily living (BADL), instrumental ADL (IADL), mobility disability, hospitalization, and death among participants without that corresponding outcome at baseline, even after accounting for covariates. Relative to participants who had normal cognition and were nonfrail, those with cognitive frailty had the highest risk for IADL disability (OR=3.40, 95% CI, 1.23-9.40) and death (OR=3.89, 95% CI, 2.25-6.47). We did not find significant interaction effects between cognitive frailty and multimorbidity (P>0.05). Overall, cognitive frailty was associated with disability and death, independent of multimorbidity. This highlights the importance of assessing cognitive frailty in the community to promote primary and secondary preventions for healthy aging.
1)认知脆弱与各种健康结果(包括残疾、住院和死亡)的关联;2)这些关联是否因多病共存而不同。我们纳入了 5113 名中国老年人(年龄≥60 岁)的数据,这些人在基线时进行了认知和身体脆弱性评估(2011 波),并随访了 4 年。约 16.0%(n=820)有认知障碍;6.7%(n=342)有身体脆弱性;1.6%(n=82)符合认知脆弱性的标准。认知障碍(比值比范围:1.41 至 2.11)和身体脆弱性(比值比范围:1.51 至 2.43)均与无对应基线结局的参与者的基本日常生活活动(BADL)、工具性日常生活活动(IADL)、行动障碍、住院和死亡独立相关,即使考虑了协变量也是如此。与认知正常且非脆弱的参与者相比,认知脆弱的参与者发生 IADL 残疾(比值比=3.40,95%可信区间,1.23-9.40)和死亡(比值比=3.89,95%可信区间,2.25-6.47)的风险最高。我们未发现认知脆弱和多病共存之间存在显著的交互效应(P>0.05)。总的来说,认知脆弱与残疾和死亡相关,独立于多病共存。这突出了在社区评估认知脆弱性以促进健康老龄化的一级和二级预防的重要性。