• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Rates of Induction of Labor at 39 Weeks and Cesarean Delivery Following Publication of the ARRIVE Trial.

作者信息

Wood Rachel, Freret Taylor S, Clapp Mark, Little Sarah

机构信息

Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.

Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Aug 1;6(8):e2328274. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.28274.

DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.28274
PMID:37561464
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10415960/
Abstract
摘要
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1ee2/10415960/1b4747f8f5a2/jamanetwopen-e2328274-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1ee2/10415960/1b4747f8f5a2/jamanetwopen-e2328274-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1ee2/10415960/1b4747f8f5a2/jamanetwopen-e2328274-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Rates of Induction of Labor at 39 Weeks and Cesarean Delivery Following Publication of the ARRIVE Trial.《ARRIVE试验》发表后39周引产率及剖宫产率
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Aug 1;6(8):e2328274. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.28274.
2
Does induction of labor at term increase the risk of cesarean section in advanced maternal age? A systematic review and meta-analysis.足月引产会增加高龄产妇剖宫产的风险吗？一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2020 Oct;253:213-219. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.08.022. Epub 2020 Aug 25.
3
Term Labor Induction and Cesarean Delivery Risk among Obese Women with and without Comorbidities.肥胖合并与不合并并存病产妇的足月引产与剖宫产分娩风险。
Am J Perinatol. 2022 Jan;39(2):154-164. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1714422. Epub 2020 Jul 28.
4
Maternal and neonatal outcomes of elective induction of labor.择期引产的母婴结局
Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2009 Mar(176):1-257.
5
An hypothetical external validation of the ARRIVE trial in a European academic hospital.ARRIVE 试验在一家欧洲学术医院的假设性外部验证。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022 Nov;35(22):4291-4298. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2020.1849108. Epub 2020 Nov 18.
6
Comparison of Maternal Labor-Related Complications and Neonatal Outcomes Following Elective Induction of Labor at 39 Weeks of Gestation vs Expectant Management: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.选择性 39 孕周引产与期待治疗对母儿产时并发症及新生儿结局的影响：系统评价和 Meta 分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 May 1;6(5):e2313162. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.13162.
7
[To the question of elective induction of labor at 39 weeks of gestation, the answer lies in the question].对于妊娠39周选择性引产的问题，答案就在问题之中。
Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol. 2018 May;46(5):481-488. doi: 10.1016/j.gofs.2018.03.009. Epub 2018 Apr 12.
8
Outcomes of Term Induction in Trial of Labor After Cesarean Delivery: Analysis of a Modern Obstetric Cohort.剖宫产术后引产分娩的结局：现代产科队列分析
Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Jul;126(1):115-23. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000922.
9
Induction of labor compared to expectant management in term nulliparas with a latent phase of labor of more than 8 hours: a randomized trial.足月初产妇潜伏期超过 8 小时时引产与期待管理的随机试验。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019 Dec 11;19(1):493. doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2602-2.
10
Maternal and newborn outcomes with elective induction of labor at term.足月选择性引产的母婴结局。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Mar;220(3):273.e1-273.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.01.223. Epub 2019 Feb 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Perinatal mortality and other severe adverse outcomes following planned birth at 39 weeks versus expectant management in low-risk women: a population based cohort study.低风险孕妇39周计划分娩与期待管理后的围产期死亡率及其他严重不良结局：一项基于人群的队列研究。
EClinicalMedicine. 2025 Jan 25;80:103076. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103076. eCollection 2025 Feb.
2
Evaluation of Statewide Program to Reduce Cesarean Deliveries Among Nulliparous Individuals With Singleton Pregnancies at Term Gestation in Vertex Presentation.评价在足月单胎头位分娩的初产妇中降低剖宫产率的全州范围计划。
Obstet Gynecol. 2024 Oct 1;144(4):507-515. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005696. Epub 2024 Aug 1.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Changes in obstetrical practices and pregnancy outcomes following the ARRIVE trial.ARRIVE试验后产科实践和妊娠结局的变化。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022 May;226(5):716.e1-716.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.02.003. Epub 2022 Feb 6.
2
Maternal body mass index and pregnancy outcomes: a systematic review and metaanalysis.母体体重指数与妊娠结局：系统评价和荟萃分析。
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2019 Nov;1(4):100041. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2019.100041. Epub 2019 Aug 30.
3
Labor Induction versus Expectant Management in Low-Risk Nulliparous Women.
Oxytocin regimen used for induction of labor and pregnancy outcomes.
用于引产的缩宫素方案与妊娠结局
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2024 Dec;6(12):101508. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2024.101508. Epub 2024 Sep 30.
4
Racial and ethnic differences in access to and outcomes of elective induction of labor in low-risk pregnancies: a scoping review.种族和民族差异对低危妊娠选择性引产的机会和结果的影响：范围综述。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024 Nov;310(5):2387-2397. doi: 10.1007/s00404-024-07735-4. Epub 2024 Sep 17.
5
Caesarean Section frequency in Nulliparous Women induced at 39 weeks versus conventional management: An open label random allocation study.39周引产的初产妇剖宫产率与传统管理的比较：一项开放标签随机分配研究。
Pak J Med Sci. 2024 Sep;40(8):1690-1694. doi: 10.12669/pjms.40.8.9099.
6
Error in the Byline.署名错误。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Sep 5;6(9):e2335837. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.35837.
低危初产妇引产与期待管理的比较。
N Engl J Med. 2018 Aug 9;379(6):513-523. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1800566.
4
Regression based quasi-experimental approach when randomisation is not an option: interrupted time series analysis.在无法进行随机化时基于回归的准实验方法：中断时间序列分析。
BMJ. 2015 Jun 9;350:h2750. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h2750.
5
Advanced maternal age and the risk of cesarean birth: a systematic review.高龄产妇与剖宫产分娩风险：系统评价。
Birth. 2010 Sep;37(3):219-26. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2010.00409.x.